Original source · versioned page text
Rpt - 240830 - 100 Hilton Tce, Noosaville - DRAFT
(b) Addresses and enhances the streetscape by incorporating
articulation and individual design elements that add visual
STREETSCAPE CHARACTER interest to the development;
Acceptable Outcome AO14.1 (reproduced below) of the Medium Density (c) Has a form and architectural scale that does not dominate
Residential Zone code addresses visual interest and streetscape character. the streetscape or the surrounding properties;
AO14.1 (d) Does not detract from the visual amenity of adjoining
properties through the impact on views, access to sunlight
Development provides visual interest to the street and or overlooking;
surrounding areas through:
(e) Takes the form of small separate buildings, rather than
(a) Highlighting individual dwellings and land uses; large single bulky development; and
(b) An asymmetrical design presentation to the street; (f) Sits within a landscaped setting.
(c) Offsetting or staggering dwellings to provide variation in the In response to PO14, the proposed development has been consciously
frontage; designed to respond to the surrounding context, as follows:
(d) Varying the roof form. ▪ The proposed roof form does not project above the 8m height limit as
required for the site and is consistent with the adjoining roof forms,
Figure 6.3.2.4 – Streetscape Character & Building Bulk – Medium Density illustrated in Figure 2 and Figure 3 below.
Street in the Medium Density Residential Zone Code provides further
example of acceptable design outcomes. ▪ The proposal achieves a staggered built form to the street frontage that
results in the appearance of individual dwellings and provide variation.
The proposed development comprises offset / staggered built form to the
street with each dwelling set back varying distances from the front boundary. ▪ Landscaping including vertical planters to create visual interest and
The proposed development includes articulation and recesses which contribute to the greenery that forms part of the Hilton Terrace streetscape
distinguish each of the four dwellings to break up the length of the building identity.
relative to the street frontage. The proposed development includes variation in ▪ The proposal incorporates variation in material such as timber and stone
roof form, including a combination of flat and skillion roof forms. However, as well as colour palette to create visual interest and highlight the
Figure 6.3.2.4 – Streetscape Character & Building Bulk – Medium Density individuality of each dwelling.
Street does not include flat roof forms in the example and despite the
proposal partially including skillion roof forms a performance outcome for ▪ The operable screening elements for the townhouse front balconies allows
streetscape character is proposed. for residents to access and utilise these spaces year-round, capitalising
further on the subtropical client of Noosa. Additionally, the front balconies
PO14 provide opportunities passive surveillance to Hilton Terrace and the
surrounding streetscape.
Development:
▪ The proposed development is compliant with the Planning Scheme
(a) Contributes positively to the locality; requirements including building height, setbacks and site cover (see
URBIS
16 KEY PLANNING MATTERS RPT - 240724 - 100 HILTON TCE, NOOSAVILLE
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.