Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Council archive · source document

Amended Refused Decision Notice · RAL18/0023

of 1

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Officer: 	Patrick Murphy
Direct Telephone: 	07 5329 6436
Our Reference:	RAL18/0023
Your Reference:	18028
6 March 2020
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd
PO Box 3144
SOUTH BRISBANE  QLD  4101
[email protected]
Dear Sir/Madam
Amended Decision Notice
Planning Act 2016
I refer to your application and advise that on 20 February 2020, Council decided to refuse the application.
Details of the decision are as follows:
APPLICATION details
Application No:	RAL18/0023
Street address:	28 Eenie Creek Rd Noosaville Qld 4566
Real property description:	Lot 3 SP 246584
Planning Scheme:	The Noosa Plan (8 June 2018)
type of development
The application sought the following type of development approval:
Reconfiguring A Lot (1 into 23)
reasons for refusal
The proposal is inconsistent with schedule 11, part 2, section 7 of the Planning Regulation 2017 as the development is situated in a koala assessable development area and does not avoid clearing non-juvenile koala habitat trees in circumstances in which any significant residual impact of the clearing is unable to be offset.
The proposal is inconsistent with biodiversity assessment benchmarks (1), (2), (4) and (5) of Part E of the State Planning Policy as the development will adversely impact upon koala habitat, with koala populations recognised as being matters of both national and state environmental significance.
The proposal is inconsistent with assessment benchmarks (3) and (4) natural hazards, risk and resilience of Part E of the State Planning Policy as the development does not facilitate an appropriate disaster management response and recovery capacity and capabilities as the emergency access points are unable to be implemented.

The proposed development will adversely impact upon koala habitat, does not maximise the retention of existing vegetation, and proposes to prematurely clear significant vegetation inconsistent with the needs of the community contrary to Overall Outcomes 13.7.2a)i, 13.7.2a)iii, 13.7.2a)iv, 13.7.2b), 13.7.2c), 13.7.2d) i, 13.7.2d)vii, 13.7.2g), and Specific Outcomes O1b, O2, O3, O7, O8b), O11, O16, O18a), O18b), O18f), O18h), O19b), O19c), O19d), O19g) and O19i) of the Biodiversity Overlay Code.
The proposed development is inconsistent with the Overall and Specific Outcomes of the Noosaville Locality Code in the following respects:
The proposal does not provide a satisfactory pedestrian and cycle network for the future development of the area and fails to provide satisfactory linkages with the existing development in the Shire Business Centre contrary to Overall Outcomes 11.7.2j) and tt)viii), Specific Outcomes O25, O100, O101, O127, O138 and O156.
The proposal fails to ensure a high level of residential amenity as it does not provide for acoustic fencing to lots 17, 18 and 19 or provide any noise mitigation measures to existing plant equipment and loading dock areas and fails to address the future amenity of Lot 21, contrary to Specific Outcome O1.
The proposal does not retain suitable existing vegetation to ensure future development will be within a park like setting contrary to Specific Outcome O3, O22 and O125.
The proposal will adversely impact on the site’s environmental values contrary to Overall Outcomes 11.7.2a)iv and 13.7.2a)ii, Specific Outcomes O3, O22 and O125.
The proposed subdivision is inconsistent with the Reconfiguring a Lot Code as:
Insufficient provision has been made for walking and cycling linkages with the existing development in the Shire Business Centre as the proposed network and linkages are unable to be implemented contrary to Overall Outcomes 14.181.2f), Specific Outcomes O8 and O9.
The proposed lots will have a significant adverse impact on the natural environment and will not retain the sites natural environmental values contrary to Overall Outcomes 14.181.2g), Specific Outcomes O21b and O22.
Bushfire mitigation measures do not satisfactorily address the risk of bushfire contrary to Overall Outcomes 13.30.2a), 13.30.2c), Specific Outcomes O4, O7, O8, O9, O11 and O12 of the Natural Hazards Overlay Code.
Bushfire mitigation measures result in the removal of vegetation contained within OS3 as detailed in Schedule 4 (Shire Business Centre Map) of the Noosa Plan.
The proposed development is contrary to the draft Noosa Plan provisions, which support the refusal of the development application for the same reasons as those applicable under the current Noosa Plan because of non-compliance with requirements for pedestrian/cycle links, an appropriate response to the site’s natural hazards and protection of the site’s environmental values including vegetation retention.
The proposed development cannot be conditioned to comply with the above assessment benchmarks.
There are no matters that would warrant approval of the development application notwithstanding the noncompliance with the assessment benchmarks.

referral agencies
The referral agencies applicable to this application are:
Referral Status	Referral Agency and Address	Referral Trigger	Response
Concurrence	SARA at DILGP SARA at DILGP Via MyDAS2 at https://prod2.dev-assess.qld.gov.au/suite/ (for assistance, contact DILGP at 5352 9701 or email:[email protected]	Schedule 10, Part 9, Division 4, Subdivision 1, Table 1 – reconfiguring a lot being for commercial uses exceeding the thresholds under Schedule 20 for development impacting upon State transport infrastructure.	The agency provided its response on 21 January 2019 (Reference No. 1812-8861 SRA). A copy of the response is attached

Advice	Column2: Energex Limited Town Planning GPO Box 1461 BRISBANE  QLD  4001	Schedule 10, Part 9, Division 4, Table 1 – Reconfiguring a Lot subject to an Easement	The agency provided its response on 25 November 2019  (Reference No. HBD 6421185). A copy of the response is attached
submissions
Not applicable.
rights of appeal
You are entitled to appeal against this decision. A copy of the relevant appeal provisions from the Planning Act 2016 is attached.
other details
If you wish to obtain more information about the decision, electronic copies are available on line at www.noosa.qld.gov.au or at Council Offices.
Yours faithfully,
Kerri Coyle
Manager Development Assessment

Enc:	Referral Agency Response
Appeal Rights

cc.	SARA at DILGP SEQ North
Energex
	Referral Agency Response PLANNING ACT 2016 & PLANNING REGULATION 2017

	Appeal Rights PLANNING ACT 2016 & PLANNING REGULATION 2017

Chapter 6 Dispute resolution
Part 1 Appeal rights
229 Appeals to tribunal or P&E Court
(1)	Schedule 1 of the Planning Act 2016 states –
(a)	Matters that may be appealed to –
(i)	either a tribunal or the P&E Court; or
(ii)	only a tribunal; or
(iii)	only the P&E Court; and
(b)	The person-
(i)	who may appeal a matter (the appellant); and
(ii)	who is a respondent in an appeal of the matter; and
(iii)	who is a co-respondent in an appeal of the matter; and
(iv)	who may elect to be a co-respondent in an appeal of the matter.
(2)	An appellant may start an appeal within the appeal period.
(3)	The appeal period is –
(a)	for an appeal by a building advisory agency – 10 business days after a decision notice for the decision is given to the agency; or
(b)	for an appeal against a deemed refusal – at any time after the deemed refusal happens; or
(c)	for an appeal against a decision of the Minister, under chapter 7, part 4, to register premises or to renew the registration of premises – 20 business days after a notice us published under section 269(3)(a) or (4); or
(d)	for an appeal against an infrastructure charges notice – 20 business days after the infrastructure charges notice is given to the person; or
(e)	for an appeal about a deemed approval of a development application for which a decision notice has not been given – 30 business days after the applicant gives the deemed approval notice to the assessment manager; or
(f)	for any other appeal – 20 business days after a notice of the decision for the matter, including an enforcement notice, is given to the person.
Note –
See the P&E Court Act for the court’s power to extend the appeal period.
(4)	Each respondent and co-respondent for an appeal may be heard in the appeal.
(5)	If an appeal is only about a referral agency’s response, the assessment manager may apply to the tribunal or P&E Court to withdraw from the appeal.
(6)	To remove any doubt. It is declared that an appeal against an infrastructure charges notice must not be about-
(a)	the adopted charge itself; or
(b)	for a decision about an offset or refund-
(i)	the establishment cost of trunk infrastructure identified in a LGIP; or
(ii)	the cost of infrastructure decided using the method included in the local government’s charges resolution.
230 Notice of appeal
(1)	An appellant starts an appeal by lodging, with the registrar of the tribunal or P&E Court, a notice of appeal that-
(a)	is in the approved form; and
(b)	succinctly states the grounds of the appeal.
(2)	The notice of appeal must be accompanied by the required fee.
(3)	The appellant or, for an appeal to a tribunal, the registrar must, within the service period, give a copy of the notice of appeal to –
(a)	the respondent for the appeal; and
(b)	each co-respondent for the appeal; and
(c)	for an appeal about a development application under schedule 1, table 1, item 1 – each principal submitter for the development application; and
(d)	for and appeal about a change application under schedule 1, table 1, item 2 – each principal submitter for the change application; and
(e)	each person who may elect to become a co-respondent for the appeal, other than an eligible submitter who is not a principal submitter in an appeal under paragraph (c) or (d); and
(f)	for an appeal to the P&E Court – the chief executive; and
(g)	for an appeal to a tribunal under another Act – any other person who the registrar considers appropriate.
(4)	The service period is –
(a)	if a submitter or advice agency started the appeal in the P&E Court – 2 business days after the appeal has started; or
(b)	otherwise – 10 business days after the appeal is started.
(5)	A notice of appeal given to a person who may elect to be a co-respondent must state the effect of subsection (6).
(6)	A person elects to be a co-respondent by filing a notice of election, in the approved form, within 10 business days after the notice of appeal is given to the person.
231 Other appeals
(1)	Subject to this chapter, schedule 1 and the P&E Court Act, unless the Supreme Court decides a decision or other matter under this Act is affected by jurisdictional error, the decision or matter is non-appealable.
(2)	The Judicial Review Act 1991, part 5 applies to the decision or matter to the extent it is affected by jurisdictional error.
(3)	A person who, but for subsection (1) could have made an application under the Judicial Review Act 1991 in relation to the decision or matter, may apply under part 4 of that Act for a statement of reasons in relation to the decision or matter.
(4)	In this section –
decision includes-
(a)	conduct engaged in for the purpose of making a decision; and
(b)	other conduct that relates to the making of a decision; and
(c)	the making of a decision or failure to make a decision; and
(d)	a purported decision; and
(e)	a deemed refusal.
non-appealable, for a decision or matter, means the decision or matter-
(a)	is final and conclusive; and
(b)	may not be challenged, appealed against, reviewed, quashed, set aside or called into question in any other way under the Judicial Review Act 1991 or otherwise, whether by the Supreme Court, another court, a tribunal or another entity; and
(c)	is not subject to any declaratory, injunctive or other order of the Supreme Court, another court, a tribunal or another entity on any ground.
232 Rules of the P&E Court
(1)	A person who is appealing to the P&E Court must comply with the rules of the court that apply to the appeal.
(2)	However, the P&E Court may hear and decide an appeal even if the person has not complied with the rules of the P&E Court

[word/footer1.xml]
Page 3 of 14

[word/footer2.xml]
PO Box 141		P. (07) 5329 6500	[email protected]
	TEWANTIN  QLD  4565	F. (07) 5329 6501	www.noosa.qld.gov.au
										Page 1 of 14

[word/footer3.xml]
Page 14 of 14

[word/footer4.xml]
Page 18 of 18

[word/footer5.xml]
PO Box 141		P. (07) 5329 6500	[email protected]	
	TEWANTIN  QLD  4565	F. (07) 5329 6501	www.noosa.qld.gov.au
				Page 1 of 3

[word/footer6.xml]
Page 5 of 3

[Attachment: image1.png (image text)]
K Coy fs


[Attachment: image10.png (image text)]
 

“SUBDIVISION of
Lots 1-19, 21-24,
Easements in
Lots 1-4, 11-18,
22-24 and
Covenants in
Lots 2, 7-9, & 23,
Cancelling ‘Lot 3
on SP246884,
Original Lot 29
‘on MCH390

 

ENGINEERING | 1656-RO1__-|G Tne
PRELIMINARY | 1856-SWO7
CONCEPT
PROPOSED.
‘SUBDIVISION
AT
NOOSA CIVIC,
WALTER HAY
DRIVE
NOOSAVILLE
Detail and Level | 034380.50 = ‘COORIOTT
‘Survey of part of
Part of Lot 3 on
‘SP246564

 

TORV LINE 19-0496 5 TT)
PROFILE,

 

LoTs 23 Rie a TATT2Oe
DRIVEWAY

LONGITUDINAL
SECTION,

 

LOTS 23 ROO a TATT2Oe
DRIVEWAY
CROSS

‘SECTIONS

 

 

ROAD _ WORKS | ROE S TWATIOTS
LAYOUT PLANS:
OF6

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Easement conditions must be maintained at all imes.

3. The applicant is required to update the conditions of Easement D on RP177294
to Energex’s current standard conditions document (Dealing Number
708346714). This is to be done prior to, or at the time of the sealing of the
‘survey plan.

4. Bollards must be installed around the existing electrical pole (at approximately

CH40) to protect the pole from vehicle collision. This is to be done prior to the
‘sealing of the survey plan.

Reference: HED 0204082

Did you know Energex has a referal website?
_ntpsJhwunw energex com authomsloursenses|eonnastoraldevelopment aplication referrals

 

 


[Attachment: image11.png (image text)]
5. Lighting structures are not permitted in the easement without prior writen
consent of Energex. Lighting designs for proposed developments (e.g. road,
carparks etc) on the easement are likely to require reduced height structures.
Please submit detailed design to Energex for approval. These drawings must
clearly show the following;

‘+ Proposed height of the lighting structures and the ground level at the
structure base;

‘+ Relative (to lighting structures) ground levels at Energex structures
(lowers, pole etc) either side of the lighting structures; and

+ The location of the Energex structures in relation to the proposed
lighting.

6. Access to the easement and access along the easement must be available to
Energex personnel, including vegetation crews and regular routine line
inspection crews, and heavy equipment, such as heavy trucks, machinery and
cranes for construction, maintenance and emergency services, at all times.

FURTHER ADVICE IN RELATION TO BUSHFIRE MANAGEMENT.

Energex wishes to highlight comments made by the Applicant in the ‘Updated Bushfire
‘Management Plan For Undeveloped Areas Of Noosa Civic For Stockwell Development
Group Pty Ltd’ Report. Section 5.2 of this report states that “is essential that the area
under the power line be managed as manicured grassland as is the current practice”.
Energex wishes to advise the Council that we do not maintain the easement in_a
manicured grassland state. If this is required for bushfire management purposes,
Council must ensure this responsibilty is suitabiity imposed on the landowner.

 

Any further works should be in accordance with Energex Standard Guidelines
H-03/12 for general conditions when considering works elther on an Energex
easement or in the vicinity of Energex assets. These are included below for your
reference.

‘We tell the Council to treat this response as a properly made submission.

‘Should you require any further information on the above matter, please contact Angela
Collins on (07) 3664 5057.

Yours faithfully,

Angela Collins
‘Senior Planner

Reference: HED 0204082

Did you know Energex has a referal website?
_ntpsJhwunw energex com authomsloursenses|eonnastoraldevelopment aplication referrals

 


[Attachment: image12.png (image text)]
Standard Guidelines OH-03/12

 

When considering Works, either on Energex easements or in the vicinity of Energex
assets, please be aware of the following general conditions:

+ Salistactory clearance from your proposed structure tothe existing (andlor future)
electricity wires must be maintained in accordance with the Electrical Safety
Regulations 2002,

+ No civil works are to occur within 5 metres of any part of an ENERGEX Structure (e.9.~
‘tower base, pole or stay) without Energex approval

+ Ifthe minimum Sm horizontal separation to the Energex structure cannot be achieved,
the Developer must consuit Energex with regards to allowable construction methods.
‘This may include full depth shoring of the excavation sides for a minimum of 5 metres
either side of the structure.

+ Any excavations deeper than Sm must have @ minimum horizontal separation from the
excavation to any tower, base or pole at least equal tothe excavation depth. The
excavation is not to be left open overnight and backiill is to be compacted in 150mm
layers in the immediate vicinity of the structure.

+ 10 metres clear access must be provided around all towers and pole structures after
‘the completion of any works on the easement.

‘Natural ground level on the easement should not be disturbed without Energex
approval.

‘+ Final ground levels should slope gently tothe edge of the easement, surrounding area
fr kerb such that pooling of water on the easement is avoided and conductor ground
clearances are not decreased.

* Stockpiling of spoil on the easement is prohibited.

‘+ Proposed underground services such as stormwater, sewerage, water and the lke are
‘to be kept to the outer edge of the easement. Services crossing the easement should
be as near as practicable to right angles to the overhiead conductor direction and not
“within 10 metres of any tower, pole or stay. Pipelines and crossings are to be clearly
‘marked. Please submit the relevant design drawings to the Principal Mains Design
Engineer for review.

NOTE: The identification, assessment and mitigation of any possible hazards in the
service due to electromagneticaly induced voltages, is the responsiblity ofthe
Developer.

+ Any cutin the vieinity ofa structure or between a structure and the road kerb will need

‘to be stabilised by a retaining wall. The retaining wall design and location is to be
submited to Energex for approval

+ Any costs incurred by Energex as a result ofthe works on the easement are to be met
by the property Developer / owner.

Reference: HED 0204082

Did you know Energex has a referal website?
_ntpsJhwunw energex com authomsloursenses|eonnastoraldevelopment aplication referrals

 

 


[Attachment: image13.png (image text)]
 

+ Access to the easement and access along the easement must be available to Energex.
Personnel, including vegetation crews and regular routine line inspection crews, and
heavy equipment, such as Heavy Trucks, Machinery and Cranes for construction,
maintenance and emergency services, at all imes.

* Existing access tracks must be re-instated, repaired or maintained if they are damaged
during construction or other activities.

+ Energex will require the Developer / owner to supply and install gates where fencing
prohibits access to and along the easement area. To enable travel along the easement
at anytime the gates must be series locked with an Energex padlock. Both the padlock
and a design drawing of an acceptable gate will be provided by Energex.

+ Lighting structures are not permitted in the easement without prior written consent of
Energex. Lighting designs for proposed developments (e.g. road, carparks etc) on the
easement are likely to require reduced height structures. Please submit detailed design
‘to Energex for approval. These drawings must clearly show the following:

‘a. Proposed height of the lighting structures and the ground level at the
‘structure base,

Relative (to lighting structures) ground levels at Energex structures (towers,
pole ete) either side ofthe lighting structures, and

cc. The location of the Energex structures in relation to the proposed lighting

* Pools and structures (including lighting structures) or metal fences are not
permitted to be installed on or near Energex easement without prior approval or
notification,

‘+ Rubbish, materials and / or tall equipment such as cranes and excavators are not
permitted to be stored or used on the easement.

+ Excavations or mounding of material under or close to conductors or Energex
structures is not permitted,

‘Energex must be notified of construction on or near the easement, conductors or
structures prior to commencement of construction.

‘= All construction work must be clear of the easement unless construction risk hazard
|s identified. High voltage clearances must be maintained prior to construction
commencing,

‘+ Waming signs may be required during and after construction.

‘+ Consideration must be given to the type of vegetation planted in Park Areas
within and near the Energex easement. Any proposal for landscaping on the
‘easement must have prior approval from Energex. Please submit the relevant
landscaping design to Energex for approval. When considering landscape designs
the planting of trees must be kept to the edges of the easement and not under any
‘overhead conductors. When mature, plants or trees must not grow in excess of
3.5 metres in height. Please visit httos:/iwww.energex.com au/homelsafety/safety-
‘round-the-network/safetree-plants fora full ist of safetree plants.

Reference: HED 0204082

Did you know Energex has a referal website?
_ntpsJhwunw energex com authomsloursenses|eonnastoraldevelopment aplication referrals

 


[Attachment: image14.png (image text)]
‘+ Atall times the folowing clearance must be maintained from the top of any machinery
‘moving inthe vicinity of energised conductors:

'* 132k and 110kV conductors — 4.5m minimum clearance
‘Should it be necessary to transport equipment or extend any equipment, such that
these clearances cannot be confidently maintained, you are required to contact our
office to ascertain whether a Safety Officer is required on-site. All operators of,
machinery are to be made aware of the presence of high voltage conductors.

‘All easement conditions must be maintained

‘All previous conditions must be adhered to and Energex may, at ts discretion, audit,
the finished development to check that it conforms to the conditions of the
development.

* Detailed civil design drawings showing any proposed cut and fill levels on the
easement and the location of the Energex assets in relation to the proposed
development must be approved by Energex before any works can commence on
site,

Reference: HED 0204082

Did you know Energex has a referal website?
_ntpsJhwunw energex com authomsloursenses|eonnastoraldevelopment aplication referrals

 

 


[Attachment: image2.png (image text)]
ee) NOOSA COUNCIL


[Attachment: image5.png (image text)]
 

teesane
‘State Development,
Manufacturing,
Infrastructure and Planning

Ourreference: «1812-9881 SRA

Yourreference: ——RALI8(0023

‘Applicant reference: 18028,
21 January 2019

‘The Chief Executive Officer
‘Noosa Shire Council
POBox 141

TEWANTIN QLD 4565
‘[email protected]

Attention: Mr Patrick Murphy

Dear Mr Murphy

Referral agency response—no requirements,
(Given under section 56 ofthe Planning Act 2016)

“The development application described below was property referred to the Department of State
Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning on 2 January 2019,

 

 

 

Applicant details

‘Applicant name: ‘Stockwell Development Group Pty Lid

‘Applicant contact details: PO Box 78
Peregian Springs QLD 4573
‘[email protected] au

Location details

‘Street adaress: 28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosavile

Real property description: Lot 3.on SP248584

Local government area: [Noosa Shire Couneil

Application details

‘Development permit, ‘Reconfiguring a lot- Commercial (1 lot in 18 ots)

‘South East Queensland (Nor) regional
oe

ike Aer Buicng Level 9, 12 Fist
‘Averae Martyr
Page 1 of2 POBox 1128, Maroochydore QLD 4555

 


[Attachment: image6.png (image text)]
812.9801 SRA

Referral triggers
‘The development application was referred to the department under the folowing provisions ofthe
Planning Regulation 2017:

© to94114 Infrastructure ~ state transport infrastructure

[No requirements
Under section $6(1)(a) ofthe Planning Act 2016, the department advises it has no requirements relating
tothe application.

‘A copy of ths response has been sent tothe applicant for their information.

For further information please contact Candace Mitchell, Senior Planning Officer, on 5352 9708 or via
‘email SEQNorthSARA@dsdmip qld gov.au who will be pleased to assist.

‘Yours sincerely

 

Deparment of State Development Manfachrng,intasrucre 2nd Planing Page 20f2

 


[Attachment: image7.png (image text)]
ceeN

 

 

 

 

 

ueenstand
‘State Development,
Manufacturing,
Infrastructure and Planning
Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning
‘Statement of reasons for application 1612-8861 SRA
(Given under section 58 ofthe Planning Act 2016)
Departmental role: Referral agency
Applicant details
‘Applicant name: ‘Stockwell Development Group Ply Lid
‘Applicant contact details: POBox 78
Peregian Springs QLD 4573
‘[email protected] au
Location details
‘Street address: "28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosavile
Real property description: Lot 3on SP246584
Local government area: Noosa Shire Council
Development details
‘Development permit, ‘Reconfiguring a lot- Commercial (1 lot in 18 ots)
Assessment matters
‘Aspect of development ‘Applicable codes
‘requiring code assessment
Planning Regulation 2017, ‘State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP), version 2.3,

‘Schedule 10, Part 2, Division 4, | State Code 6: Protection of state transport networks.
‘Subdivision 1, Table 1, tem 1—

Development impacting on state
transport infrastructure

 

 

 

 

Reasons for the department's decision

‘The reasons for the decision are:

‘+The proposed development will not impact upon the safe and efficient operation of state transport
infrastructure or pubic passenger services.

‘+ The proposed development will not impact on stormwater drainage within a state transport corridor.

‘+ The proposed development will have safe and convenient access to public passenger transport.

si
‘+ The development application is for reconfiguring lot for commercial development (1 lot into 19 lots).
‘© Date of the referral agency response, no requitements: 21 January 2019

Relevant material

‘South East Queensland (Nor) regional
oe

Hike Aer Buicng Level 3, 12 Fist
‘Averae Martyr
Page 1 of2 POBox 1128, Maroochydore QLD 4555

 


[Attachment: image8.png (image text)]
812.9801 SRA

‘Submitted development application material
‘State Development Assessment Provisions published by the Department of Infrastructure, Local
Government and Planning, version 23
© DARules
Planning Act 2016
Planning Regulation 2017

Deparment of State Development Manfachrng,intasrucre 2nd Planing Page 20f2


[Attachment: image9.png (image text)]
25 November 2019

energex

Patrick Murphy
cease positive emery

Via email: [email protected] au

ce Harrison Hurst
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd
Via email [email protected]

Dear Sir/Madam,

Development Application ~ Reconfiguring A Lot - Commercial (1 lot into
19) located at Noosa Civic 28 Eenie Creek Rd Noosaville, described as Lot
3.on SP246584,

Applicant Ref: 18028

Council Ref: RAL18/0023

Our Ref: HBD 6804682

We refer to the above referenced Development Application which has been
referred to Energex Limited in accordance with the Planning Act 2016.

This response has been amended due to the receipt of amended
plansidocuments from the applicant and supersedes Energex’s
Previous referral responses (Energex Ref: HBD 6421185 dated 7”
January 2019 & Energex Ref: 6758518 dated 10” October 2019).

In accordance with Schedule 10, Part 9, Division 2 of the Planning
Regulation 2017, the application has been assessed against the purposes of
the Electricity Act 1994 and Electrical Safety Act 2002. The below response
is provided in accordance with section 56(1) of the Planning Act 2016.

Should the Assessment Manager decide to approve the proposed
Reconfiguring A Lot - Commercial (1 lot into 19), as an Advice Agency for the
Application, Energex requires that the assessment manager impose the
following conditions:

1. This application is approved in accordance with the below referenced
plans. Any alterations to these plans should be resubmitted to
Energex for comment:

   

He Ge

PROPOSED [osseass f= OUTING

 

Reference: HED 0204082

 

Corporate Oce
25 Redaci Sect
‘Newstead LD 4008
(GPO Bor 401
Sisbane 4001
“Telephone (07) 9068 4000,
Facsimile (07) 2005 201,
rm energexcam au

Energex Limited
‘ABN 20078849 055

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.3 MB (small file)
File type
DOCX

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Amended Refused Decision Notice.docx · 1.3 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.