Council archive · source document
Properly Made Submission (support) - Mark Dunleavy - MCU12/0023
liijii liii @
80490243
Sunshine Coast Regional Council
Locked Bag 72
Sunshine Coast Mail Centre
QLD 4560
21st May 2012.
Dear Sirs,
RE: Material Change of Use Application 12/0023-215/219 David Low Way, Peregian Beach.
I write this letter in support to the proposed MCU noted above. I personally have been coming to the
Peregian Beach area regularly (at least twice a month) for the past 7 years, Whilst I am not a resident
in the immediate vicinity, I feel that I have a vested interest in the area and community at large due
to my frequent visitation.
I first become aware of the proposed development through the development notices issued on the
site in question. It is my understanding since the DA was granted for the proposed development; the
developer has successively requested that council amend the current DA on a number of matters.
The current planning system enables members of the public to write in letters of support or
opposition to the gazetted changes and it is under this provision I write the following:
There is currently a shortage of affordable accommodation the Peregian Beach area, with
greater competition and thus affordability in and around Coolum Beach. It is often when I
would like to stay in Peregian that the availability of short-term accommodation that is of a
reasonable standard and within and affordable price bracket is vastly inaccessible. It is
primarily a concern as I feel many people are often staying outside of Peregian and travelling
to enjoy the area, subsequently I feel there are funds expended in surrounding areas that
could be spent directly in the community through tourism and retail functions. In reference
to the DA amendment, I feel outdoor balconies off of the short-term accommodation rooms
are a necessity that must be provided. Personally, when I look for accommodation, a balcony
to reside on outside is an essential requirement to facilitate the enjoyment of the local
climate and ambiance. If this is declined, then accommodation in the surrounding areas wi"
benefit with a competitive edge over the subject development and be to the detriment of
local enterprise and the community of Peregian Beach.
In reference to the second amendment, ’AI fresco’ dining is evident in the village precinct. It
is an integral characteristic to making the precinct on the whole, a fantastic place to visit and
dine out. Significantly, it must be noted that the adjacent Peregian Beach Tavern also has the
ability to provide such amenities to potential patrons. I feel that the proposed development
should not be prejudiced against, as I feel there is enough precedence and merit as to why
outdoor dining should not be refused for the subject site.
It is my opinion that this development would enhance the built environment, much in the way the
recently completed retail development (Corner of Herron Street and David Low Way) has improved
the vi "age precinct. It wi" provide a high level of amenity to would be tourists and visitors to
.
MC(//:L/()O;l3
I Box: .rl.~.r.hf...R: ...M..........I.2)
119r2 .""
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
Peregian Beach, whilst enhancing the characteristics that define the area. The initial and ongoing
benefit to local enterprise is unquestionable, and it is for the rational cited above that the proposed
amendments should be supported by council.
Yours Sincerely,
~~
Mark R Dunleavy.
-C--7
27A Ludlow Street
Hamilton
Qld 4007
Used in these records
Properly Made Submission (support) - Mark Dunleavy - MCU12/0023Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 805 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.