Council archive · source document
210028 - Further Issues Response · 51994.1222.01
Level M1
88 Creek Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
07 3831 5577
[email protected]
www.vivapropertygroup.com.au
Our Ref: 210028
Your Ref: 1994.1222.01
Date: 30 August 2021
Attn: Maxwell Potter
Noosa Council
PO Box 141
TEWANTIN QLD 4565
Via: email([email protected])
Dear Maxwell,
RE: PLANNING ACT 2016
FURTHER ISSUES RESPONSE
3/31 NOOSA DRIVE, NOOSA HEADS QLD 4567
LOT 3 ON BUP106009
We act for Siga Property Pty Ltd regarding a Minor Change Application lodged with Noosa Council
under the Planning Act 2016 (the Act) over the above property.
On 14 July 2021 we received a Further Advice Letter from Noosa Council.
We now provide a response to the Further Advice Letter.
We request Noosa Council to now proceed with assessment of the application.
FURTHER ADVICE RESPONSE
Issue
Performance Outcome PO11 of the Tourist Accommodation Zone code requires the maximum site
cover does not exceed 40%. The proposed plans do not clearly indicate if the proposed garden room
will increase the site cover of the building beyond what is allowable under the Noosa Plan 2020.
Advice Required
1. Please provide plans detailing the proposed site cover in accordance with the Performance
Outcome PO11 of the Tourist Accommodation Zone code.
Please refer to the Amended Proposal Plans provided as Attachment 1 which detail the existing as-
constructed site cover on the site. It is noted that the proposed site cover will be 36.7% and, therefore,
the proposed garden room complies with PO11 of the Tourist Accommodation Zone Code.
The applicant has gone to considerable effort and expense in order to ensure that the existing as-
constructed site cover on the site has been accurately calculated in accordance with the definition of
site cover as outlined in Schedule 1 of the Noosa Plan 2020.
Attention is drawn to the fact that the development was not constructed strictly in accordance with the
approved plans of development (development approval TPC 2707) which has resulted in some minor
discrepancies in calculated site cover as opposed to the previously approved site cover.
Viva Property Group Pty Ltd | ABN 28 161 458 822
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 8 pages
Page 2
Notwithstanding, it is noted that the as-constructed site cover calculation generally accords with the
previously approved site cover.
Specifically, the calculated as-constructed site cover is 35.3% as compared to the approved site cover
of 34.98% as shown on the approved plans of development (TPC 2707). As such, even if there were
any doubt as to the accuracy of the calculated as-constructed site cover, the approved site cover of
34.98% would still clearly indicate that the proposed development will not exceed an overall site cover
of 40%.
The proposed development complies with PO11 of the Tourist Accommodation Zone Code.
Method Used to Calculate As-Constructed Site Cover on Site
To calculate and confirm the ‘as-constructed’ measurements on site, the following was undertaken:
Copies of the original Gabriel Poole architectural drawings and the Tod engineering drawings
were obtained;
The draftsman was engaged to scan the plans onto the system and, subsequently, a physical
check measure was conducted on site;
The physical check measure on site was conducted with electronic metering that recorded the
distances from boundaries and the external walls of the individual units (noting that electronic
measurement was chosen in order to obtain more accurate measurements);
The on-site measurements were compared with the dimensions on the original plans to ensure
that there were no great anomalies; and
It was discovered that a large section of unit 1 was never constructed, and that the layout,
position and access to the rear lift well in Unit 3 was changed completely and was built below
ground, accessed via the side courtyard of unit 3.
It is reiterated that the as-constructed site cover calculations on site have been determined in
accordance with the definition of site cover as outlined in Schedule 1 of the Noosa Plan 2020.
The applicant welcomes the opportunity to meet with Council officers on site if deemed necessary in
order to substantiate the as-constructed site cover measurements.
Issue
Performance Outcome PO12 of the Tourist Accommodation Zone code requires the maximum plot ratio
does not exceed 0.65:1. The proposed plans do not clearly indicate if the proposed garden room will
increase the plot ratio of the building beyond what is allowable under the Noosa Plan 2020.
Advice Required
2. Please provide plans detailing the proposed gross floor area in accordance with the Performance
Outcome AO12 of Tourist Accommodation Zone code.
Please refer to the Amended Proposal Plans provided as Attachment 1 which detail the existing as-
constructed gross floor area on the site. It is noted that the proposed gross floor area will be 574.72m2
(560.87m2 existing plus 13.75m2 proposed) and, therefore, results in a plot ratio of 0.61:1. As such, the
proposed development complies with PO12 of the Tourist Accommodation Zone Code.
210028: Further Issues Response Page 2
Page 3
Again, it is noted that the applicant has gone to considerable effort and expense in order to ensure that the existing as-constructed gross floor area on the site has been accurately calculated in accordance with the definition of gross floor area as outlined in Schedule 1 of the Noosa Plan 2020. Attention is again drawn to the fact that the development was not constructed strictly in accordance with the approved plans of development (development approval TPC 2707) which has resulted in some discrepancies in calculated gross floor area as compared to the approved plans of development. Specifically, the calculated as-constructed gross floor area is 560.87m2 as compared to the approved gross floor area of 681.59m2 as shown on the approved plans of development (TPC 2707). This discrepancy is due to the fact that some areas of the site that were defined as gross floor area on the approved plans were never constructed, as well as some areas on the approved plans being calculated as gross floor area which are not defined as gross floor area under the current Noosa Plan 2020 (for example, areas for building services, plant or equipment). With regard to the original figure of 681.59m2 gross floor area as shown on the original plans, the following is noted. The entirety of the Ground/Basement level included areas that were never constructed and others that do not fit within Council’s definition of gross floor area. Therefore, the gross floor area for the Ground/Basement level of 69.73m2 must come off the original gross floor area calculation leaving a net figure of 611.86m2. On Level 1, the non-existent staircase needs to come out as does the area for the water feature (16.34m2) and the external staircase (12.8m2). This results in an overall gross floor area of 582.72m2. On Level 2, removal of the areas not defined as gross floor area results in a gross floor area of 246.34m2. This results in an overall gross floor area of 566.87m2. The Level 3 calculation is largely accurate; however, Level 4 reduces by the area of the main entry stair (6m2) resulting in a total gross floor area of 560.87m2 based on the definition of gross floor area as outlined in Schedule 1 of the Noosa Plan 2020. If necessary, the applicant would welcome a site visit by Council officers as it can be clearly seen that many areas that have been originally included as gross floor area have either never been constructed, or are areas that are outside Council’s definition of gross floor area. It is considered that the proposed development complies with PO12 of the Tourist Accommodation Zone Code. Method Used to Calculate As-Constructed Gross Floor Area on Site To determine gross floor area, access was gained to all units to check measure the main walls to compare the approved plans to ‘as-constructed’. As a result, accurate figures for gross floor area as defined by Noosa Plan 2020 were determined. It is reiterated that the as-constructed gross floor area calculations on site have been determined in accordance with the definition of gross floor area as outlined in Schedule 1 of the Noosa Plan 2020. The applicant welcomes the opportunity to meet with Council officers on site if deemed necessary in order to substantiate the as-constructed gross floor area measurements. 210028: Further Issues Response Page 3
Page 4
Issue Acceptable Outcome AO13.1 of the Tourist Accommodation Zone code requires buildings and structures are setback 1.5 metres when the building is up to 4.5 metres in height. The proposed plans indicate the garden room will be setback 0.615m from the side boundary to the north. Advice Required 3. Please address Performance Outcome PO13 of the Tourist Accommodation Zone code to justify the setback relaxation. It is acknowledged that the proposed garden room will be setback 615mm from the northern side boundary. However, attention is drawn to the fact that the proposed garden room will be for the enclosure of an existing terrace area which contains an existing block wall located 615mm from the northern side boundary. As such, the proposal does not represent an entirely new addition within the side boundary setback, but only an enclosure of an existing terrace area. Further, attention is drawn to the context of the subject site and its interface with the adjoining lot to the north. Specifically, it is noted that the location of the proposed garden room is screened from the adjoining premises by existing mature and dense vegetation and that the adjoining building is orientated away from the side boundary. As such, the proposed garden room will not be visible from the adjoining premises and, therefore, will not have any adverse impact on visual amenity whatsoever. This is demonstrated in Figure 1 below. It is also noted that the proposed garden room seeks to enclose an existing terrace area which is located 615mm from the northern side boundary. As such, the proposed development will actually result in a reduction of any potential for adverse acoustic amenity impacts on the adjoining residents. Specifically, the enclosure of the existing terrace area will provide increased acoustic attenuation of any existing noise impacts associated with the use of the terrace. To summarise the above, the proposed garden room will not be visually discernible in any way from the adjoining premises and the enclosure of the terrace area will reduce any existing acoustic amenity impacts resulting from its use. Therefore, there will be absolutely no impacts on the visual or acoustic amenity of adjoining residents, and, in fact, any existing impacts will be reduced by the proposed development. 210028: Further Issues Response Page 4
Page 5
FIGURE 1 PROPOSAL RESULTS IN NO ADVERSE VISUAL OR ACOUSTIC AMENITY IMPACTS
Notwithstanding the above discussion, which clearly demonstrates that the proposed development will
not result in any adverse visual or acoustic amenity impacts, a full assessment of the proposed
development against PO13 of the Tourist accommodation zone code is provided in Table 1 below.
TABLE 1 PO13 TOURIST ACCOMMODATION ZONE CODE
Performance Outcome Response
Tourist Accommodation Zone Code
PO13 Performance Outcome
Buildings and other structures are designed It is considered that the proposed development will
and sited to: meet the Performance Outcome in the following
ways:
a) provide a high level of amenity to users The proposed garden room will not be visually
of the subject site and adjoining discernible in any way from the adjoining premises
premises, including provision of visual and the enclosure of the terrace area will reduce
and acoustic privacy;
any existing acoustic amenity impacts resulting
from its use.
Therefore, there will be absolutely no impacts on
the visual or acoustic amenity of adjoining
residents, and, in fact, any existing impacts will be
reduced.
Further, the proposed development will improve the
level of amenity for users of the subject site through
the provision of all-weather protection to the
existing terrace area.
It is considered that the proposed garden room
provides a high level of amenity to users of the
210028: Further Issues Response Page 5
Page 6
Performance Outcome Response
subject site and adjoining premises, including
provision of visual and acoustic privacy.
b) not unreasonably obstruct views or The proposed garden room will be heavily buffered
cause overlooking of private open space by existing mature and dense screening vegetation
or habitable areas of adjoining premises; and will be located in an area of the site that will not
result in any obstruction of views or overlooking of
private open space or habitable areas of adjoining
premises.
The building on the adjoining premises is orientated
away from the location of the proposed garden
room and there are no private open space or
habitable areas that will be visible from the
proposed garden room.
As such, it is considered that the proposed garden
room will not unreasonably obstruct views or cause
overlooking of private open space or habitable
areas of adjoining premises.
c) provide adequate distance from adjoining The proposed garden room will have a building
land uses; separation to the adjoining building of
approximately 4m.
It is noted that the proposed garden room will have
a building height of less than 4.5m and, therefore, a
fully compliant side boundary setback would be
1.5m. It is noted that a fully compliant side
boundary setback on both lots would result in a
building separation of 3m (1.5m setback on each
lot).
As such, the proposed development provides a
building separation that substantially exceeds the
minimum building separation as sought by the Code
and, therefore, is considered to be more than
adequate.
Additionally, it is noted that the proposed
development is for the enclosure of the existing
terrace area, and does not reduce the existing
separation between the existing terrace area and
the adjoining premises.
The proposed building separation is depicted in
Figure 2 below.
d) preserve existing vegetation that will help The proposed garden room will enclose an existing
buffer development; terrace area and will not result in any removal of the
existing mature and dense screening vegetation
that will buffer the development.
The proposed development preserves existing
vegetation that will help buffer development.
210028: Further Issues Response Page 6
Page 7
Performance Outcome Response
e) allow for space and landscaping to be The proposed garden room is for the enclosure of
provided between buildings including an existing terrace area and will not result in any
adequate area at ground level for reduction of space for landscaping to be provided
landscaping with trees, shrubs, outdoor
between buildings as compared to existing site
living and utilities;
conditions.
f) be consistent with the predominant The proposed garden room will be located towards
character of the surrounding area, the rear of the existing building on site and will in no
maintaining the visual continuity and way be discernible from the street.
pattern of buildings and landscape
elements within the street; and As such, the proposed development will maintain
the visual continuity and pattern of buildings and
landscape elements within the street.
Please refer to Figure 3 below for a pictorial
representation.
g) protect the natural character and avoid The proposed garden room is for the enclosure of
adverse impacts on ecologically an existing terrace area and will not result in any
important areas such as the beach, adverse impacts on the natural character or
Noosa River, national parks and other
ecologically important areas such as the beach,
parklands.
Noosa River, national parks and other parklands.
As demonstrated in Table 1 above, the proposed garden room complies with all aspects of PO13 of the
Tourist accommodation zone code and, therefore, it is considered that the proposed northern side
boundary setback is an entirely appropriate development outcome for the site.
FIGURE 2 PROPOSED BUILDING SEPARATION IS MORE THAN ADEQUATE
210028: Further Issues Response Page 7
Page 8
FIGURE 3 PROPOSED GARDEN ROOM WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM THE STREETSCAPE
CONCLUSION AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION
The following information is attached in support of this Further Issues Response:
Attachment 1 Amended Plans.
We trust this information is sufficient for your purposes. Should you require any further details or wish
to discuss these matters, please contact the undersigned on (07) 3831 5577.
Yours sincerely,
James Stott
Director
210028: Further Issues Response Page 8
Page 9
Attachment 1 Amended Proposal Plans Prepared by Windrim Building 210028: Further Issues Response Page 9
Used in these records
210028 - Further Issues Response.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 661 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.