Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

Town Planning Report

Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0023 Development Application (Email 1 of 2).

of 22

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

        a) have a front boundary setback of at least 6m; and
        b) garage doors that face the street and are visible from the road frontage have a maximum width of
           6m within any one plane, with additional garage doors setback an additional 1m from the
           frontage to break up the width of the garage façade.

        Response:

        The proposed garage is located a minimum 2.2m away from the font boundary. As such, a
        Performance Outcome is requested. It is considered that the proposed garage location will not result
        in adverse impacts on surrounding properties based on the following:
         The proposed garage is single storey and will not dominate the street frontage of the site;
         The proposed setback is consistent with existing dwelling setbacks along Seaview Terrace,
             particularly to the north of the site;
         The roof form of the garage is of a similar style to surrounding developments; and,
         Will not exceed 6m in width.

Natural Hazards Overlay Code

The proposed development was assessed against the purpose and overall outcomes of the Natural Hazards
Overlay Code and complied where relevant, with the following exceptions. Refer to Appendix C for full
assessment against the Biodiversity Overlay Code.

        O1

        Development is located to ensure it does not compromise the safety of people, property or hazardous
        materials manufactured or stored in bulk by increasing risk of landslide;

        S1.1

        The proposed development is not located in a landslide hazard area as indicated on Overlay Maps
        OM1.3-OM9.335;
        OR

        S1.2

        The development site is not subject to landslide, either internally or from sloping land above the site
        {eg. slopes are less than 1 in 10 (10%)
        AND

        S1.3

        Development, including necessary earthworks within Precinct F of the Noosa Springs site, improves
        the stability of any non-natural landform so it is not at risk from landslide either on the site or from
        sloping land above the site.

        S2.1

        No solution provided

        Response to S1.2 to S2.1:

        The proposed dwelling is located within a Land Slide Hazard Area and therefore a Performance
        Outcome is requested. It is considered that the proposed dwelling will not compromise the safety of
        people or properties as the dwelling will be located in a similar position to the recently approved
        dwelling over the subject site (MCU12/0159). The proposed development is generally in accordance
          17    44 Seaview Terrace, Sunshine Beach – Development Assessment Report
Log in to download the original file

Town Planning Report.pdf · 1.0 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.