2016-09-06 Services & Organisation Committee Agenda

ATTACHMENT 1




   Page 40 of 47

Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet                                                                                                       ATTACHMENT 1

    aucorrenoenee                                      |e
No. |NAME OF TENDERER                                             excl of GS               fo        ff                                        ff                                                  |
 q                                                                                          o         -         20         »         ao         ee        “         a)         wo        *        100
 2                                                                                         Un ecorpiette        Very Pow             Pew                  ue                 Very Geod          Exceptions!
                                                                                            The ratings:
                                                                                            » 0 (zero) = Unacceptable — a fal for that crtena and extreme risk
                                                                                            + 20 (twenty) = Very Poor — the content of the submission for that cnteria ts of a low standard and high risk
                                                                                            + 40 (forty) = Poor = the content of the submission for that criteria is unimpressive and poses a moderate nsk
                                                                                            = 60 (sixty) « Good — the content of the submission for that criteria is meritable and will need to be monitored if awarded
                                                                                            + 80 (eighty) « Very Good — the content of the submission for that criteria is of @ high standard and advantageous
                                                                                            + 100 (one-huncred) = Excepbonal - the content of the submession for tat crftena is flawless / outstanding and most advantageous
                                                                                            Once al the Gata is entered the resultant scores based on the price and non price elements are automatically cakulated for you
    NON-CONFORMING TENDERS                                                                    Number of Tenders Evaluated     = = © [__2 _ ]forall Tender portions

                                                                            1                    2
    —                                                                         |      sm
                                                                        Resutant              Resultart
                                            vo
                                                                        weignting             weighting

                                                                                            =

                                                                                            p12

    Total Technical Score                                    4296
    Normalised Technical Score (Tn)                          pO
    PART     -Pric element                                               ee
    mae
    Average Fees (Pav) $..........--ccccee    $1,448,847
     na                                                      a
    Normalised Price Score (Pn)                                                             75
    ‘Weighted Price Score (Pw)
    Total Score of price and non price
    elements
    OTHER DETAILS
         Assesment panel member 1                                                                       The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
         Assesment panel member 2
        Assesment panel member 3                                                                                                                                                        ee
         Assesment panel member 4                                                                                                                  Signature
         Assesment     panel member 6
                     ps                                                                                                                                                                                                Page 40 of 47