Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

Sealed Judgement

of 206

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file (118 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Original PDF page 182, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

Attachment 3—Reasons for referral agency response

The reasons for SARA’s decision are:
• SARA assessed the development against the following code of the SDAP, version 3.0:
       o State code 25: Development in South East Queensland koala habitat areas (State code 25).

•   Subject to conditions, the development complies with the assessment benchmarks of State code
    25 of the SDAP in that the development:
        o does not cause an unacceptable impact on mapped koala habitat areas;
        o is designed and located so that where the matters of state environmental significance
            cannot be reasonably avoided and minimised, impacts are reasonably mitigated; and
        o results in a significant residual impact that is acceptable, and an offset is provided.




      State Assessment & Referral Agency                                                       180
Log in to download the original file

Sealed Judgement.pdf · 118 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.