Original source · versioned page text
Sealed Judgement
Very large file (118 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 68, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
6.8 D ESIGN C ONFLICT
Following the mediation process, where the design changed on the request of the opposing
Noosa Council team, there have been a number of additional removals. Of the now 100 tree
removals, the following table illustrates the number of trees where conflict occurs with the
design.
Following consultation with the design team, the positioning of the boardwalks was realigned
to avoid high value trees, where possible, while achieving the new cabins' positions.
Please note that all TBC trees were reassigned a Remove status.
Table 10: Design conflict per tree
Remove – 2025
Design Conflict
Number of trees Redundant / Remove
3 Redundant
Cabin 1 & Carpark 26
23 Removals
17 Redundant
Cabin 2 & 3 29
12 Removals
Cabin 4 & 5 2 2 Removals
Cabin 6 & 7 1 1 Removal
Cabin 8 & 9 2 2 Removal
4 Redundant
Cabin 10 & 11 9
5 Removals
Cabin 12 & 13 3 3 Removals
4 Redundant
Cabin 14 & 15 11
7 Removals
2 Redundant
Bushfire 14
12 Removals
Bio Basin 3 3 Removals
25_05_28_AR_RACV_RACV v NSC_Tree Retention Review_V10 Page 19 of 32
66
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.