Original source · versioned page text
Sealed Judgement
Very large file (118 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 74, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
A PPENDIX 1: D EFINITION OF T ERMS
The terms below are frequently used to simplify the definition of trees during assessments.
Age Class (AC):
Young Early stage of growth, immature size
Early mature: Fast-growing well-established tree which has not yet reached mature size
Mature The tree reached its mature size and exhibits slowing growth rates with early stages of naturally forming
dead or dysfunctional wood.
Over Mature The tree has reached mature size and is unlikely to increase significantly in height or mass. Retrenchment
of the upper crown with increased vegetative vitality in the lower crown, increased fungal activity and wood
decay and increased colonisation by flora and fauna.
Veteran Tree with advanced retrenchment, reduced crown size and annual increment growth, extensive hollowing,
crown collapse, low vigour, advanced heartwood decay, and advanced colonisation by fauna and flora.
Health (H):
Good Good: Tree with no defects or disorders which are notable. Full canopy with good colour foliage. Minimal
pathogen damage.
Fair Fair: Tree with minor defects or disorders which are notable. Some dead wood within what can be an
unbalanced canopy, foliage generally with good colour although some discolouration may be present typical
of species in location. Minor pathogen damage.
Poor Poor: Tree with major defects or disorders which are notable. The tree has considerable deadwood present
and discoloured or distorted leaves indicating a further decline of the tree. Detrimental pathogen damage.
Dead Dead or dysfunctional moribund tree.
Structure (St):
Good Tree with good unions and no branch defects. Sound trunk with no / minor defects. Good buttress and root
structure.
Fair Tree with minor defects or disorders which are notable. Small areas of bark missing. Small cavities or minor
unfavourable branch unions may be present. Minor damage to roots.
Poor Tree with major defects, large hollows, weak unions and/or problematic damaged roots.
Hazardous This implies a tree with a major defect that may fail at any time
Abbreviations:
DBH Diameter at Breast Height - The approximate diameter of the trunk measured visually in millimetres or meters
at a height of 1.4m.
TPZ The Tree Protection Zone, as per AS 4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites, is the principal
means of protecting trees on a development site. The TPZ is a combination of the root and crown area
requiring protection to be isolated from construction disturbance so that the tree can remain in a viable
condition. The TPZ incorporates the Structural Root Zone (SRZ).
The radius of the TPZ = DBH x 12
A TPZ should not be less than 2m or greater than 15m (unless crown protection is required).
SRZ The Structural Root Zone, as per AS 4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites, is a mathematical
calculation of the surface area of protection required to maintain a tree’s stability – a larger area is required
to maintain a tree in viable health. It is only necessary to calculate the SRZ when a major encroachment into
a TPZ is proposed.
Tree Retention Value:
The retention value status is based on industry-recognised methods of ascertaining the retention value of a tree. The suitability
of the tree for preservation or retention is based on the individual qualities of each tree. By taking into consideration the health,
structural condition, aesthetics, age, size, longevity (Safe Useful Life Expectancy) and ability to adapt to new environments the
viability of the tree can be reasonably determined.
For trees in non-use areas (e.g., Open spaces) where a range in tree quality is appropriate, all trees may be considered
suitable, except for invasive species.
Suitability for Retention/Preservation Categories are:
High: Tree retention is the priority.
The tree has high amenity, heritage and/or environmental value. It is in reasonably good condition (any minor
structural or health problems can be mitigated), has a long life expectancy and can recover from injury or
respond to environmental changes.
Medium: Tree retention is desirable.
The tree is in fair-good condition, is a locally common species, the tree contributes to the aesthetics of its
locality and should survive for many years. The tree may have health or structural problems that can be
mitigated with treatment.
Low: The tree is not considered worthy of special measures to ensure its retention.
The tree is in poor condition with significant defects that cannot be mitigated, has a short Useful Life
Expectancy, or the tree is expected to decline regardless of treatment. The tree has low value in the
landscape or is an undesirable species.
Dead/ Tree removal is recommended, unless in a suitable area for ecological retention.
Remove: Trees are considered potentially hazardous, have very poor specimens, and/or may be environmental or
noxious weeds.
25_05_28_AR_RACV_RACV v NSC_Tree Retention Review_V10 Page 25 of 32
72
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.