Minor Change Request

        example, reducing the size of a retail
        complex may reduce the capacity of the
        complex to service the intended
        catchment); or
    •   Removes a component that is integral to         The proposed changes do not involve
        the operation of the development; or            removal of a component that is integral to
                                                        the operational of the development.
    •   Significantly impacts on traffic flow and the   The proposed changes will not result in
        transport network, such as increasing           significant impacts on traffic flow and the
        traffic to the site; or                         transport network, such as increasing traffic
                                                        to the site.
    •   Introduces new impacts or increases the         The proposed change does not introduce
        severity of known impacts; or                   any new impacts, nor will it increase the
                                                        severity of known impacts.
    •   Removes      an    incentive    or    offset    No     incentive    or   offset  components
        component that would have balanced the          incorporated.
        negative impact of the development; or
    •   Impacts on infrastructure provisions.           The proposed development does not impact
                                                        upon infrastructure provisions.

The original application did not trigger any referral agency assessment and no referral agency assessment is
now triggered with the changes.

ASSESSMENT

Pursuant to Clause 81 (4) & (5) the responsible entity must consider the statutory instrument, or
other document, as in effect when the development application for the development approval was
properly made.

However, the responsible entity may give the weight the responsible entity considers is appropriate,
in the circumstances, to—
    (a)     the statutory instrument or other document as in effect when the change application was
            made; or
    (b)     if the statutory instrument or other document is amended or replaced after the change
            application is made but before it is decided—the amended or replacement instrument or
            document; or
    (c)     another statutory instrument—
            (i)     that comes into effect after the change application is made but before it is
                    decided; and
            (ii)    that the responsible entity would have been required to consider if the instrument
                    had been in effect when the development application for the development
                    approval was properly made.

Comment: The original application was lodged and approved under the superseded Noosa Plan 2006. The
proposed changes do not offend any provisions of the superseded Noosa Plan 2006.

The proposed changes have also been assessed below against the relevant sections of the current Noosa
Plan 2020, being the Noosaville Local Plan, Major Centre Zone, Business Activities & relevant works codes.
In summary, it is considered that the development remains consistent with the original application.