Original source · versioned page text
2020-09-14 General Committee Meeting Notes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 SEPTEMBER 2020
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING - LIVE RECORD MEETING NOTES
14 SEPTEMBER 2020 - Crs Frank Wilkie (Chair), Karen Finzel, Joe Jurisevic,
Amelia Lorentson, Clare Stewart, Brian Stockwell and Tom Wegener
1 132005.1133.13 - PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL NO 2097 OF 2020 -
APPLICATION FOR A MINOR CHANGE TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR 140
MULTIPLE DWELLING UNITS & ASSOC FACILITIES - SHOP, RESTAURANT, MULTI-
FUNCTION ROOM & GYM AT 75 RESORT DRIVE, NOOSA HEADS
Cr Finzel declared a real conflict of interest in this matter (as defined in section 175D of the Local
Government Act 2009) due to her relationship with Leigh McCready who is associated with the
applicant Altum Constructions. Leigh McCready was involved with Cr Finzel’s 2020 Election
campaign. Cr Finzel left the meeting room for the debate and decision on this matter.
Cr Stewart declared a perceived conflict of interest in this matter (as defined in section 175D of the
Local Government Act 2009) due to her friendship with the Applicants Rob and Leigh McCready of
Altum Constructions. Cr Stewart left the meeting room for the debate and decision on this matter.
Cr Stockwell declared a perceived conflict of interest in this matter (as defined in section 175D of the
Local Government Act 2009 as he advised that on 24 February 2020 this year he sought a review by
the Independent Council Election Observer (ICEO) as to the public claims of the Future Noosa Team,
of which Leigh McCready was publicly identified as a Campaign Manager. Leigh McCready is
associated with the applicant, Altum Constructions. Cr Stockwell believed that he could consider this
item impartially and in the public interest and requested to remain in the meeting room to participate
in the debate and vote on this matter.
Pursuant to section 175E(4) of the Local Government Act 2009, the remaining Councillors gave
consideration to whether the conflict was a real conflict or perceived conflict and whether Cr Stockwell
may participate in the meeting for the debate and vote on this matter or whether he must leave the
meeting for the debate and vote on this matter.
Committee Resolution
Moved: Cr Jurisevic
Seconded: Cr Wegener
That Councillors note the perceived conflict of interest declaration of Cr Stockwell and resolve that this
represents a perceived conflict of interest in this matter and Cr Stockwell may remain in the meeting
room to participate in the debate and vote on this matter.
Carried unanimously.
Cr Stockwell did not vote on the above motion.
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Jurisevic
Seconded: Cr Lorentson
That Council note the report by the Manager Development Assessment to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 8 September 2020 regarding Planning &
Environment Court Appeal 2097 of 2020 and agree to defend the appeal.
Carried unanimously.
Cr Stockwell voted in favour of the motion.
Crs. Finzel and Stewart returned to the meeting.
Page 1 of 12
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 11 sections
Section 2
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 SEPTEMBER 2020
2 MCU11/0266.03 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO CURRENCY PERIOD FOR A
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE OF PREMISES FOR
OFFICE, RESTAURANT & SHOP AT 6 HERON STREET, PEREGIAN BEACH
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Stockwell
Seconded: Cr Jurisevic
That Council note the report by the Coordinator Planning to the Planning & Environment
Committee Meeting dated 8 September 2020 regarding Application No. MCU11/0266.03 for
an extension to the currency period for a Development Permit for Material Change of Use for
Business Type 1 Office, Entertainment and Dining Business Type 1 Food & Beverage &
Retail Business Type 2 Shop & Salon, situated at 6 Heron Street, Peregian Beach and:
A. Refuse to extend the currency period for the following reasons:
1. The proposed development is contrary to the Overall Outcomes 7.7.2 g), jj) and
oo) and Specific Outcomes O6 and O12 of the Eastern Beaches Locality Code
of the Noosa Plan 2006 as:
i. The proposed development does not incorporate a pitched or curved roof
form, exceeds the maximum plot ratio for the Neighbourhood Centre Zone
and results in a building scale which is not compatible with surrounding
development and which presents an appearance of excessive bulk to
adjacent properties, roads and the village green.
2. The proposed development is contrary to the Purpose, Overall Outcomes and
Performance Outcomes PO11 and PO12 of the Local Centre Zone of the Noosa
Plan 2020 as:
i. The proposed development is not small in scale in the context of Peregian
Beach village, exceeding the maximum plot ratio of the site and will result
in a building which is not compatible with the scale of surrounding
development and presents a bulky appearance adjacent properties, roads
and the village green.
ii. The proposed development does not provide a 2 metre setback to the
village green and maintain the visual continuity and pattern of buildings
fronting the village green and consequently will impact on the area’s
amenity.
3. The proposed development is contrary to the Purpose and Overall Outcomes
and the Performance Outcome PO3, PO7 and PO10 of the Coastal Communities
Local Plan Code of the Noosa Plan 2020 as:
i. The proposal does not retain and enhance the built form of streetscape
character of the centre as the scheme has excessive plot ratio and site
cover, and proposes inadequate setbacks to the village green.
ii. The proposed development does not provide varied roof forms and
variations in projected and recessed elements and facades.
iii. The proposed development does not respect the scale and character of
development on adjoining sites and is not sympathetic to the coastal village
character of the local centre.
Page 2 of 12
Section 3
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 SEPTEMBER 2020
4. It is unlikely the proposed development can proceed as approved as it makes no
allowance for equitable access to level 1 and the roof terrace contrary to the
Building Code of Australia and the Disability Discrimination Act 1992.
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
Carried unanimously.
3 51988.2849.03 - MINOR CHANGE TO A DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR A MULTIPLE
DWELLING OF 20 UNITS, 8 SHOPS AND 2 RESTAURANTS - 49 HASTINGS STREET,
NOOSA HEADS
Cr Lorentson declared a perceived conflict of interest in this matter (as defined in section 175D of the
Local Government Act 2009) as during the 2020 election campaign, Cr Lorentson’s election material
was displayed at this property. Cr Lorentson advised that she does not have a personal relationship
with the applicant however her brother has had a prior business relationship with the applicant that
ended 3 years ago. Cr Lorentson also advised that her husband has undertaken work at the business
as an employee of Page Furnishers. Cr Lorentson believed that she could consider this item impartially
and in the public interest and requested to remain in the meeting room to participate in the debate and
vote on this matter.
Pursuant to section 175E(4) of the Local Government Act 2009, the remaining Councillors gave
consideration to whether the conflict was a real conflict or perceived conflict and whether Cr Lorentson
may participate in the meeting for the debate and vote on this matter or whether she must leave the
meeting for the debate and vote on this matter.
Committee Resolution
Moved: Cr Wilkie
Seconded: Cr Stewart
That Councillors note the perceived conflict of interest declaration of Cr Lorentson and resolve that
this represents a perceived conflict of interest in this matter and Cr Lorentson may remain in the
meeting room to participate in the debate and vote on this matter.
Carried unanimously.
Cr Lorentson did not vote on the above motion.
Motion
Moved: Cr Wegener
Seconded: Cr Wilkie
That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning & Environment
Committee Meeting dated 8 September 2020 regarding Application No. 51988.2849.03 to
make a minor change to an existing approval for Multiple Dwelling of 20 units, 8 Shops and
2 Restaurants situated at Noosa On The Beach, 49 Hastings Street Noosa Heads and:
A. Refuse the application for the following reasons:
1. The proposal is not consistent with the overall and specific outcomes of the
Noosa Heads Locality Code under the Noosa Plan 2006 as:
a. the proposed works will adversely impact on main beach being a key
recreation focal point for residents and visitors
b. an inadequate building setback to the beach is proposed and the proposal
reduces the soft landscaping on site
Page 3 of 12
Section 4
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 SEPTEMBER 2020
c. the proposed works do not represent the high level of design and
landscape quality that is sought for the area
d. The proposed works contribute additional site cover exceeding the
maximum site cover sought for the area and present excessive bulk to main
beach
2. The proposal is contrary to the Driveways and Car parking Code as sufficient car
parking has not been provided on site to accommodate the number of vehicles
likely to be generated by the increase and improvements to the dining areas.
3. The proposal is contrary to the Noosa Plan 2020 provisions for setbacks, site
cover and car parking.
4. The proposal is not considered a minor change to the development approval as
the proposed changes will dramatically change the approved built form in terms
of scale, bulk and appearance.
B. Note that Council relies on the following reasons for varying from the staff
recommendation:
1. The built form is not a minor change to the overall scale and bulk of the existing
development.
2. That the application seeks to sanction unapproved ‘creep’ of commercial uses
and structures into a location where there is a long standing planning intent to
maintain private open space.
3. Council differs from staff opinion in relation to Specific Outcome 8; and is of the
view that the proposal detrimentally impacts on the visual and acoustic amenity
and of beach users and adjoining and nearby premises.
4. Council is not prepared to accept a contribution in lieu of the shortfall of car parks
spaces on site.
A. Approve the change.
B. Include the additional conditions contained in the Planning & Environment Committee
Agenda dated 8 September 2020.
C. Include the following new Advisory Note:
Qualified Person
1. A Qualified Person, for the purpose of:
a. Undertaking, supervising tree works and preparing arboriculture
certification, is considered to be a person with a minimum three years
current experience in tree protection, hazard identification/mitigation
assessment and either:
i. International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) certification; or
ii. A Diploma of Arboriculture.
D. Agree to enter into an Infrastructure Agreement with the applicant that provides for
contributions in lieu of one onsite car parking space.
E. Find the following matters relevant to the assessment and sufficient reason to approve
the application:
Page 4 of 12
Section 5
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 SEPTEMBER 2020
1. The proposal complies with the Overall Outcomes of the Noosa Heads Locality
Code as the development will provide for entertainment and dining premises,
providing interest for visitors and residents accommodated in the immediate
area, whilst outdoor dining facilitates a vibrant pedestrian friendly streetscape;
2. The development is consistent with the bulk and scale of buildings within
proximity to the subject site, presenting an improved, high quality built form and
landscaping along The Parade, and providing a direct link to Main Beach.
F. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
G. Note the application was lodged under the Noosa Plan 2006, which was superseded
by the Noosa Plan 2020, which commenced on 31 July 2020. All references to the
‘Noosa Plan’ or ‘the planning scheme’ within the assessment report is in reference to
the now superseded Noosa Plan 2006.
For: Crs. Wegener and Stockwell
Against: Crs. Stewart, Jurisevic, Finzel, Lorentson and Wilkie
Lost.
Procedural Motion
Moved: Cr Stockwell
Seconded: Cr Jurisevic
That consideration of the application be deferred to the Ordinary meeting on 17 September
2020 to allow additional information to be provided to Councillors.
For: Crs. Wegener, Stockwell and Jurisevic
Against: Crs. Stewart, Finzel, Lorentson and Wilkie
Lost.
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Wilkie
Seconded: Cr Stewart
That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the Planning & Environment
Committee Meeting dated 8 September 2020 regarding Application No. 51988.2849.03 to
make a minor change to an existing approval for Multiple Dwelling of 20 units, 8 Shops and
2 Restaurants situated at Noosa On The Beach, 49 Hastings Street Noosa Heads and:
A. Approve the change.
B. Include the following additional conditions:
Additional conditions – 8 September 2020
Approved Plans
1. Development authorised by this approval must be undertaken generally in
accordance with the Approved Plans. The approved plans are listed in the
following table and may be amended by these conditions and annotations on the
plans.
Page 5 of 12
Section 6
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 SEPTEMBER 2020
Plan No. Rev Plan Name – Prepared by Date
A002 Q Existing Façade, prepared by Kings Lane 05/02/2020
Architects
A100 Q Proposed Refurbishment, prepared by Kings 05/02/2020
Lane Architects
As annotated by Council
A101 Q Proposed GR FLR Refurbishment, prepared 05/02/2020
by Kings Lane Architects
As annotated by Council
A104 Q Proposed Areas, prepared by Kings Lane 05/02/2020
Architects
A300 Q Proposed Section, prepared by Kings Lane 12/02/2020
Architects
A310 Q Proposed Elevations, prepared by Kings Lane 05/02/2020
Architects
A800 Q Proposed Perspective 01, prepared by Kings 05/02/2020
Lane Architects
A801 Q Proposed Perspective 02, prepared by Kings 05/02/2020
Lane Architects
LD 01 C Landscape Design, prepared by 3 February
Sheet 1 of 4 Environmental Landscape Planning 2020
LD 02 C Landscape Design, prepared by 3 February
Sheet 2 of 4 Environmental Landscape Planning 2020
LD 03 C Landscape Design, prepared by 3 February
Sheet 3 of 4 Environmental Landscape Planning 2020
LD 04 C Landscape Design, prepared by 3 February
Sheet 4 of 4 Environmental Landscape Planning 2020
Nature and Extent of Approved Use
2. The area to be used for outdoor dining is limited to 14.1m2 of use area.
3. No works or storage of materials is to occur within The Parade, unless authorised
by a further permit.
Landscaping
4. The development site must be landscaped in accordance with the Approved
Plans.
5. The existing Pandanus trees located within the raised garden beds must be
retained in accordance with the Approved Plans. A Qualified Person* must be
engaged for the duration of the works to:
a. Supervise tree protection within the development site and frontages, prior
to, during and following construction in accordance with AS 4970,
Protection of trees on development sites.
Page 6 of 12
Section 7
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 SEPTEMBER 2020
b. Provide Council with certification and photographic report on supervising
construction works within the tree protection zone of the retained Pandanus
trees, following the completion of the approved works.
6. All landscape works must be established and maintained in accordance with the
approved design for the life of the development, and in a manner that ensures
healthy, sustained and vigorous plant growth. All plant material must be allowed
to grow to full form and be refurbished when its life expectancy is reached.
7. All landscape works must be maintained generally in accordance with the
approved design for the life of the development.
8. No signage is to be located within the landscaped areas.
Damage to infrastructure
9. Any damage to footpaths, street plantings, natural vegetation/trees kerb and
channel, bridges or roadways must be repaired or reinstated to at least pre-
existing conditions.
10. Where damage occurs to any Council asset as a result of the landscaping works,
the damage must be repaired immediately where it creates a hazard that
presents risk to person or property. Non-hazardous damage must be repaired
prior to completion of works.
Car Parking
11. The applicant must comply with the requirements of any Infrastructure
Agreement entered into with the Council with respect to the payment of car
parking contributions in relation to the proposed development. In the event that
the Infrastructure Agreement does not apply a minimum of one car parking space
must be provided and marked on the site and made available and accessible at
all times while the use is open for business.
12. A retaining wall must be maintained for the full length of the property to main
beach with removable flood gates installed or available for installation prior to any
significant coastal storm event to each entry point. These structures must be
designed to mitigate the impact of wave overtopping of the Council controlled
beach seawall during a significant event. Certification must be submitted to
Council from a RPEQ which certifies that these structures meet the requirements
of this condition.
C. Include the following new Advisory Note:
Qualified Person
1. A Qualified Person, for the purpose of:
a. Undertaking, supervising tree works and preparing arboriculture
certification, is considered to be a person with a minimum three years
current experience in tree protection, hazard identification/mitigation
assessment and either:
i. International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) certification; or
ii. A Diploma of Arboriculture.
D. Agree to enter into an Infrastructure Agreement with the applicant that provides for
contributions in lieu of one onsite car parking space.
Page 7 of 12
Section 8
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 SEPTEMBER 2020
E. Find the following matters relevant to the assessment and sufficient reason to approve
the application:
1. The proposal complies with the Overall Outcomes of the Noosa Heads Locality
Code as the development will provide for entertainment and dining premises,
providing interest for visitors and residents accommodated in the immediate
area, whilst outdoor dining facilitates a vibrant pedestrian friendly streetscape;
2. The development is consistent with the bulk and scale of buildings within
proximity to the subject site, presenting an improved, high quality built form and
landscaping along The Parade, and providing a direct link to Main Beach.
F. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
G. Note the application was lodged under the Noosa Plan 2006, which was superseded
by the Noosa Plan 2020, which commenced on 31 July 2020. All references to the
‘Noosa Plan’ or ‘the planning scheme’ within the assessment report is in reference to
the now superseded Noosa Plan 2006.
For: Crs. Wilkie, Lorentson, Stewart, Jurisevic and Finzel
Against: Crs. Wegener and Stockwell
Carried.
4 PROPOSED LEASE OF COOROY DATA CENTRE AT 11A MAPLE STREET, COOROY
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Jurisevic
Seconded: Cr Lorentson
That Council note the report by the Property Advisor to the General Committee Meeting dated
14 September 2020 regarding the lease on Council’s Cooroy Data Centre premises at 11A
Maple Street and:
A. Agree to enter a commercial lease of the premises to OneQode Assets Pty Ltd as
generally outlined in the report; and
B. Agree to negotiate and enter a licence for an associated wireless internet
telecommunications mast on the adjacent Cooroy Butter Factory rooftop.
Carried unanimously.
Page 8 of 12
Section 9
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 SEPTEMBER 2020
5 NOOSA NORTH SHORE BEACH CAMPGROUND – PROPOSED INTERIM
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Stockwell
Seconded: Cr Stewart
That Council note the report by the Property Advisor Commercial Property to the General
Committee Meeting dated 14 September 2020 and:
A. Authorise the CEO to enter into an interim management agreement for the Noosa North
Shore Beach Campground with 1Eight Pty Ltd for 6 months commencing 1 October
2020 with an additional 1 x 1 month extension option at Council’s sole discretion; and
B. Apply the exception to the requirement under Section 235 (a) of the Local Government
Regulation 2012 for entering into a contract for goods and services without first inviting
written quotes or tenders if satisfied that there is only 1 supplier who is reasonably
available.; and
C. Further, staff undertake a detailed induction of the new manager to identify the key
environmental attributes and sensitive sites and to outline visitor management
expectations to ensure the park and adjoining dunal system is managed in line with
environmental best practice.
Carried unanimously.
6 TENDER T0000017 - STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Jurisevic
Seconded: Cr Stewart
That Council note the report by the Works Coordinator to the General Committee Meeting
dated 14 September 2020 and:
A. Award tender T000017 Street Sweeping Services to Specialised Pavement Services
Pty Ltd;
B. Award the contract for an initial term of two (2) years, with an option to extend for one
(1) term of up to twelve (12) months. The option to extend will be at Council’s own
discretion and subject to the contractor’s ability to meet the requirements under the
contract.
Carried unanimously.
Page 9 of 12
Section 10
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 SEPTEMBER 2020
7 NOOSA RIVER OYSTER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT – ANNUAL REPORT
NO. 1 AND OUTCOMES OF INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF MONITORING AND
EVALUATION PLAN
Cr Stockwell declared a perceived conflict of interest in this matter (as defined in section 175D of the
Local Government Act 2009) due to the fact as a Sole Trader in his business Watershed Australia, he
subcontracted Eberhard Consulting as part of a consulting project he did for the Queensland
Government in 2016 reviewing and developing the monitoring and evaluation of the Reef Plan Best
Management Program. Cr Stockwell believed that he could consider this item impartially and in the
public interest and requested to remain in the meeting room to participate in the debate and vote on
this matter.
Pursuant to section 175E(4) of the Local Government Act 2009, the remaining Councillors gave
consideration to whether the conflict was a real conflict or perceived conflict and whether Cr Stockwell
may participate in the meeting for the debate and vote on this matter or whether he must leave the
meeting for the debate and vote on this matter.
Committee Resolution
Moved: Cr Jurisevic
Seconded: Cr Stewart
That Councillors note the perceived conflict of interest declaration of Cr Stockwell and resolve that this
represents a perceived conflict of interest in this matter and Cr Stockwell may remain in the meeting
room to participate in the debate and vote on this matter.
Carried unanimously.
Cr Stockwell did not vote on the above motion.
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Stockwell
Seconded: Cr Jurisevic
That Council note the report by the Environmental Services Manager to the General
Committee Meeting dated 14 September 2020 and approve the Noosa River Oyster Project:
Annual Report No. 1 (provided as Attachment 1 to the report) as meeting the requirements
of the Alliance & Funding Agreement.
For: Crs. Wegener, Stockwell, Jurisevic and Wilkie
Against: Crs. Stewart, Finzel and Lorentson
Carried.
Page 10 of 12
Section 11
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 SEPTEMBER 2020
8 USE OF LIONS PARK NOOSA HEADS FOR CAR PARKING
Motion
Moved: Cr Stewart
Seconded: Cr Jurisevic
That Council note the report by the Project Manager Transport Innovation to the General
Committee Meeting dated 14 September 2020 and:
A. Approve the use of the Noosa Heads Lions Park Reserve for paid car parking over
2020/21 Christmas holiday period from 14 December 2020 to 27 January 2021 with
delegation to the CEO to reduce the days subject to weather and advice from the
Council COVID Safe team;
B. Approve the use of the Noosa Heads Lions Park Reserve for paid car parking over
2021 Easter holiday period from 2 April 2021 to 18 April 2021 with delegation to the
CEO to reduce the days subject to weather and advice from the Council COVID Safe
team; and
C. Approve the one-off use of the Noosa Heads Lions Park Reserve for paid car parking
over the 2020 September holiday period from 19 September 2020 to 5 October 2020
with delegation to the CEO to reduce the days subject to weather and advice from the
Council COVID Safe team; and
DC. Consult with the community on the use of the Noosa Heads Lions Park Reserve for
paid car parking on long weekends and all school holidays only during the period of
the COVID pandemic.
Amendment
Moved: Cr Stockwell
Seconded: Cr Wegener
That item D be deleted, and new items D and E be added to read:
D. Write to the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and seek Ministerial
Approval for an inconsistent secondary use of the Noosa Heads Lions Park (Lot 117
on SP108103) for paid car parking during school holidays and long weekends for the
period of the public health declaration for the COVID-19 pandemic; and
E. That an amount equivalent to 50% of Council’s share of the ‘profit’ from car parking in
the Noosa Heads Lions Park Reserve be held ‘in reserve’ and allocated to recreational
improvements in Lions park for residents and visitors alike, noting that the term ‘profit’
refers to Council’s share of the revenue less costs associated with rectifying any
damage/impact from parking on the reserve, the hire of temporary fencing to protect
children at the playground & BBQ area, parking signage at Lions Park, the printing of
tickets and the use of traffic control to assist in the movement of pedestrians from Lions
Park.
For: Crs. Wegener, Stockwell, Stewart, Jurisevic, Finzel and Lorentson
Against: Cr Wilkie
Carried.
Page 11 of 12
Section 12
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 SEPTEMBER 2020
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Stewart
Seconded: Cr Jurisevic
That Council note the report by the Project Manager Transport Innovation to the General
Committee Meeting dated 14 September 2020 and:
A. Approve the use of the Noosa Heads Lions Park Reserve for paid car parking over
2020/21 Christmas holiday period from 14 December 2020 to 27 January 2021 with
delegation to the CEO to reduce the days subject to weather and advice from the
Council COVID Safe team;
B. Approve the use of the Noosa Heads Lions Park Reserve for paid car parking over
2021 Easter holiday period from 2 April 2021 to 18 April 2021 with delegation to the
CEO to reduce the days subject to weather and advice from the Council COVID Safe
team; and
C. Approve the one-off use of the Noosa Heads Lions Park Reserve for paid car parking
over the 2020 September holiday period from 19 September 2020 to 5 October 2020
with delegation to the CEO to reduce the days subject to weather and advice from the
Council COVID Safe team; and
C. Consult with the community on the use of the Noosa Heads Lions Park Reserve for
paid car parking on long weekends and all school holidays only during the period of
the COVID pandemic.
D. Write to the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and seek Ministerial
Approval for an inconsistent secondary use of the Noosa Heads Lions Park (Lot 117
on SP108103) for paid car parking during school holidays and long weekends for the
period of the public health declaration for the COVID-19 pandemic; and
E. That an amount equivalent to 50% of Council’s share of the ‘profit’ from car parking in
the Noosa Heads Lions Park Reserve be held ‘in reserve’ and allocated to recreational
improvements in Lions park for residents and visitors alike, noting that the term ‘profit’
refers to Council’s share of the revenue less costs associated with rectifying any
damage/impact from parking on the reserve, the hire of temporary fencing to protect
children at the playground & BBQ area, parking signage at Lions Park, the printing of
tickets and the use of traffic control to assist in the movement of pedestrians from Lions
Park.
For: Crs. Wegener, Stockwell, Stewart, Jurisevic, Finzel and Lorentson
Against: Cr Wilkie
Carried.
9 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT – AUGUST 2020
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Jurisevic
Seconded: Cr Finzel
That Council note the report by the Manager Financial Services to the General Committee
Meeting dated 14 September 2020 outlining August 2020 year to date financial performance
against budget, including performance against key financial sustainability indicators.
Carried unanimously.
Page 12 of 12