Original source · versioned page text
2020-09-14 General Committee Meeting Notes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 14 SEPTEMBER 2020
7 NOOSA RIVER OYSTER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT – ANNUAL REPORT
NO. 1 AND OUTCOMES OF INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF MONITORING AND
EVALUATION PLAN
Cr Stockwell declared a perceived conflict of interest in this matter (as defined in section 175D of the
Local Government Act 2009) due to the fact as a Sole Trader in his business Watershed Australia, he
subcontracted Eberhard Consulting as part of a consulting project he did for the Queensland
Government in 2016 reviewing and developing the monitoring and evaluation of the Reef Plan Best
Management Program. Cr Stockwell believed that he could consider this item impartially and in the
public interest and requested to remain in the meeting room to participate in the debate and vote on
this matter.
Pursuant to section 175E(4) of the Local Government Act 2009, the remaining Councillors gave
consideration to whether the conflict was a real conflict or perceived conflict and whether Cr Stockwell
may participate in the meeting for the debate and vote on this matter or whether he must leave the
meeting for the debate and vote on this matter.
Committee Resolution
Moved: Cr Jurisevic
Seconded: Cr Stewart
That Councillors note the perceived conflict of interest declaration of Cr Stockwell and resolve that this
represents a perceived conflict of interest in this matter and Cr Stockwell may remain in the meeting
room to participate in the debate and vote on this matter.
Carried unanimously.
Cr Stockwell did not vote on the above motion.
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Stockwell
Seconded: Cr Jurisevic
That Council note the report by the Environmental Services Manager to the General
Committee Meeting dated 14 September 2020 and approve the Noosa River Oyster Project:
Annual Report No. 1 (provided as Attachment 1 to the report) as meeting the requirements
of the Alliance & Funding Agreement.
For: Crs. Wegener, Stockwell, Jurisevic and Wilkie
Against: Crs. Stewart, Finzel and Lorentson
Carried.
Page 10 of 12
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.