Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Original source · versioned page text

2021-10-08 Special Meeting Minutes

of 7

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

                      MINUTES



              Special Meeting


               Friday, 8 October 2021

                               9.00am
          Council Chambers, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin



Crs Clare Stewart (Chair), Karen Finzel, Joe Jurisevic, Amelia Lorentson,
Brian Stockwell, Tom Wegener, Frank Wilkie



                    “Noosa Shire – different by nature”
Log in to download the original file

2021-10-08 Special Meeting Minutes(PDF, 756KB).pdf · 774 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 6 sections

Section 2

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES                                                                    8 OCTOBER 2021


PURPOSE OF MEETING
The purpose of the Special Meeting was to consider the Draft Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan
(CHAP) Community Consultation Submissions.


1    ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES

     COUNCILLORS
     Councillor C Stewart, Mayor
     Councillor K Finzel
     Councillor J Jurisevic
     Councillor A Lorentson
     Councillor B Stockwell
     Councillor T Wegener
     Councillor F Wilkie

     EXECUTIVE
     B de Chastel, Chief Executive Officer
     A Dow, Acting Director Environment and Sustainable Development
     L Sengstock, Director Infrastructure Services

     APOLOGIES
     Nil.

     The meeting commenced at 9.00am.

2    REPORTS

     1      DRAFT COASTAL HAZARDS                     ADAPTATION          PLAN      (CHAP)      COMMUNITY
            CONSULTATION SUBMISSIONS
            In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Lorentson provided the
            following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:
            I, Cr Lorentson, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter as
            my brother, Gabriel Cerasani, owns a property at Beaches Estate, Sunrise Beach which is one of
            the properties identified as `at risk' under the draft CHAP. My brother owns a beachfront property
            at Sunrise Beach. The Property is directly affected by the draft CHAP and directly covered by
            mapping looking at future erosion risk based on future models. My brother has also made a
            submission on the CHAP and is also a member of the executive committee of the Eastern
            Beaches Protection Association Inc. During my election campaign my brother helped me with my
            campaign, handed out voting cards and 2 of my election signs were outside his property on David
            Low Way. At a recent meeting, I declared my COI and asked to leave the room as I have in the
            past because although I believe I could consider the matter impartially and in the public interest,
            I believe that some members of the public may still have a perception of bias. Because of the
            significance of the CHAP and its Shire-wide implications, and because I have received legal
            advice from Council’s lawyers to state that I have a declarable and not prescribed COI, I would
            like to exercise my right to due process under s150 ES(3) of the Local Government Act 2009,and
            ask that the Councillors present at this meeting room, be my judge and decide whether I must
            leave the room or if I can stay and participate in the meeting, including voting on the matter. The
            legal advice received a few days ago, states that my personal interest in matters concerning the
            CHAP in fact form the basis of a declarable conflict of interest and not a prescribed interest: “when
            matters being considered by Council is not an application, rather the draft CHAP, we consider
            that the personal interest is not caught by s150EI and is not capable of forming the basis of a
            prescribed COI in matters concerning the CHAP.” It is on record that on a number of occasions

                                                                                                   Page 2 of 7

Section 3

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES                                                                  8 OCTOBER 2021


        I have indicated to the CEO that I would strongly prefer to be engaged in the CHAP process on
        the basis that this issue is a significant one for the whole community and the whole shire deserves
        the representation of all its elected representatives. In fact the CHAP has political, legal and
        financial implications for the whole SHIRE of Council not just Sunrise Beach, and the narrow area
        that affects my brother. Many of these implications are unrelated to the perceived interest of one
        property on the Eastern Beaches. Everyone in this room and every ratepayer will be impacted by
        the CHAP and not just my brother. Council assets, our beaches, the environment and all
        ratepayers. This is evident on page 3 of the Draft CHAP, where the CHAP’s core objectives are
        listed to include:
               identifying what actions are required to avoid, reduce or adapt to these risks to people,
                property, assets and environment;
               providing mapping and visual products and deliverables that are useful for a range of
                purposes across Council departments and functions and within the community (e.g.
                planning scheme, asset management, community awareness, disaster management and
                financial planning; and
               to provide direction for a coordinated approach for Council and the community to adapt to
                climate change and coastal hazards.
        The CHAP covers open Coast areas - Peregian Beach to Sunshine Beach, Noosa Heads, and
        Noosa North Shore. It includes areas along the Lower Noosa River (Noosa Heads, Tewantin,
        and in particular Noosaville and Noosa North Shore) that will be increasingly at risk of inundation
        associated with rising sea levels. Inundation and rising sea levels will pose the greatest risk to
        Council infrastructure such as stormwater networks, open space and roads and some private
        property, as well as indirect consequences on adjacent retail and commercial activities. In open
        coast areas, impacts will be experienced not just to private properties, but also to Council
        Infrastructure, such as roads and recreational areas, including our beaches. It is understood that
        the CHAP in its final form, together with the Climate Change Adaptation Plan, the Zero Emissions
        Strategy and the Climate Change Policy, will form Council’s response to climate change. Further,
        the CHAP is intended to guide decision-making across key areas of Council, including:
               Corporate and operational planning and financial planning;
               Land use planning and development assessment;
               Infrastructure planning, design and management including roads, stormwater and
                foreshores;
               Management of non-infrastructure assets including conservation and recreational areas;
               Community resilience planning; and
               Emergency management.
        These are significant Shire wide implications that will impact more than just the one property that
        my brother owns at Sunrise Beach. It is my opinion that is not democratic nor reasonable to
        exclude me from a significant or important shire wide issue which is, in my opinion, a policy and
        not a planning instrument. Although I have a declarable conflict of interest and I believe I could
        consider the matter impartially and in the public interest. I will choose to remain in the meeting
        room. However, I will respect the decision of the meeting on whether I can remain and participate
        in the decision. I also inform the meeting that I have a further declarable conflict of interest in this
        matter as I have a close personal relationship with Mark Bain and the Bain family, owner of 1
        Noosa River Road which is an at risk property under the draft CHAP, they are family friends that
        have attended social events together and whose children both attended school together and
        surfed together as part of the Noosa Board Riders Club. During the election I had an election sign
        at Gympie Tce Petrol Station with the approval of the business owner and Mark Bain was the
        landlord of the property. Mr Bain also appeared in one of my videos circulated during the election
        campaign. I believe I can consider this matter impartially and in the public interest. Therefore, I
        will choose to remain in the meeting room. However, I will respect the decision of the meeting on
        whether I can remain and participate in the decision without voting regarding the Eastern Beaches
        and Noosa North Shore.

        In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Finzel provided the
        following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest in this matter:
        I, Cr Finzel, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter as on 5
        March 2020, Mr Peter Butt who is an Executive Member of the Eastern Beaches Protection
        Association donated $1666.66 to my 2020 Election Campaign where I was one of three
        candidates that ran as a group known as 'Future Noosa' (which is no longer an entity). Although

                                                                                                 Page 3 of 7

Section 4

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES                                                                 8 OCTOBER 2021


         I have a declarable conflict of interest, I do not believe a reasonable person could have a
         perception of bias because I believe that I do not have a close personal relationship with Mr Butt
         and I believe I can consider this matter impartially and in the public interest. Therefore, I will
         choose to remain in the meeting room. However, I will respect the decision of the meeting on
         whether I can remain and participate in the decision.

         Council Resolution
         Moved:              Cr Wilkie
         Seconded:           Cr Wegener
         That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Lorentson and determine that it is in the
         public interest that Cr Lorentson remain in the meeting room for this item, on the condition that
         she does not participate in the debate nor vote on issues regarding the private estate along the
         Eastern Beaches and Noosa North Shore, because Council believes that Cr Lorentson could
         provide valuable input into the discussion on such a significant Shire-wide matter, and therefore
         a reasonable person would trust that the final decision is made in the public interest.
                                                                                    Carried unanimously.
         Crs Lorentson and Finzel did not vote on the above motion.

         Council Resolution
         Moved:    Cr Wilkie
         Seconded: Cr Jurisevic
         That Council note the declarable conflict of interest by Cr Finzel and determine that it is in the
         public interest that Cr Finzel remain in the meeting room for this item, on the condition that she
         does not participate in the debate nor vote on issues regarding the private estate along the
         Eastern Beaches, because Council believes that Cr Finzel could provide valuable input into the
         discussion on such a significant Shire-wide matter, and therefore a reasonable person would trust
         that the final decision is made in the public interest.
                                                                                    Carried unanimously.
         Crs Lorentson and Finzel did not vote on the above motion.

         The following material was presented to the meeting in relation to this item:
              Cr Stockwell – refer to Attachment 1

         Council Resolution
         Moved:              Cr Wilkie
         Seconded:           Cr Stockwell
         That Council note the report by the Principal Strategic Planner and Program Coordinator
         Climate Change Adaptation to the Special Meeting dated 8 October 2021 and
         A.    Note the report on submissions received during the community consultation on the
               draft Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan;
         B.    Approve the draft Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan for the purpose of undertaking
               further community consultation, as provided in Attachment 1;
         C.    Approve the Community Engagement and Communications Plan as the basis for
               undertaking further community consultation, as provided in Attachment 3.
                                                                         Carried unanimously.
         Crs Lorentson and Finzel did not vote on the above motion.




3   MEETING CLOSURE
    The meeting closed at 10.35am


                                                                                                Page 4 of 7

Section 5

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES           8 OCTOBER 2021


    Attachment 1 – Cr Stockwell




                                       Page 5 of 7

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES                                               8 OCTOBER 2021

     Attachment 1 — Cr Stockwell

                                                         Not
5	1	1	1	3	2	1689	543	92	47	96	only
5	1	1	1	3	3	1797	553	68	27	95	are
5	1	1	1	3	4	1880	543	72	37	95	the
5	1	1	1	3	5	1969	543	216	37	96	emissions
4	1	1	1	4	0	1570	609	699	37	-1	
5	1	1	1	4	1	1570	609	226	37	96	consistent
5	1	1	1	4	2	1810	609	95	37	96	with
5	1	1	1	4	3	1926	611	81	35	96	RCP
5	1	1	1	4	4	2023	611	65	35	96	8.5
5	1	1	1	4	5	2106	609	35	37	94	in
5	1	1	1	4	6	2159	609	110	37	94	close
4	1	1	1	5	0	1571	675	683	47	-1	
5	1	1	1	5	1	1571	679	241	43	96	agreement
5	1	1	1	5	2	1826	675	95	37	96	with
5	1	1	1	5	3	1941	675	196	37	95	historical
5	1	1	1	5	4	2153	675	101	37	96	total
4	1	1	1	6	0	1570	742	582	36	-1	
5	1	1	1	6	1	1570	742	244	36	92	cumulative
5	1	1	1	6	2	1830	744	89	34	90	CO2
5	1	1	1	6	3	1935	742	217	36	96	emissions
4	1	1	1	7	0	1571	806	673	48	-1	
5	1	1	1	7	1	1571	806	152	48	95	(within
5	1	1	1	7	2	1743	806	91	48	95	1%),
5	1	1	1	7	3	1853	806	73	38	93	but
5	1	1	1	7	4	1942	808	152	36	90	RCP8.5
5	1	1	1	7	5	2111	808	30	36	95	is
5	1	1	1	7	6	2156	806	88	38	96	also
4	1	1	1	8	0	1569	874	598	37	-1	
5	1	1	1	8	1	1569	874	72	37	95	the
5	1	1	1	8	2	1661	874	91	37	95	best
5	1	1	1	8	3	1769	874	132	37	96	match
5	1	1	1	8	4	1919	878	74	33	95	out
5	1	1	1	8	5	2007	878	45	33	93	to
5	1	1	1	8	6	2070	874	97	37	91	mid-
4	1	1	1	9	0	1570	940	737	47	-1	
5	1	1	1	9	1	1570	944	169	43	96	century
5	1	1	1	9	2	1755	940	131	37	95	under
5	1	1	1	9	3	1900	944	162	33	96	current
5	1	1	1	9	4	2077	940	79	37	96	and
5	1	1	1	9	5	2174	940	133	37	96	stated
4	1	1	1	10	0	1572	1006	724	47	-1	
5	1	1	1	10	1	1572	1006	163	47	96	policies
5	1	1	1	10	2	1750	1006	95	37	96	with
5	1	1	1	10	3	1863	1006	72	37	96	still
5	1	1	1	10	4	1955	1006	129	47	96	highly
5	1	1	1	10	5	2102	1006	194	47	96	plausible
4	1	1	1	11	0	1572	1072	728	45	-1	
5	1	1	1	11	1	1572	1072	122	37	96	levels
5	1	1	1	11	2	1709	1072	45	37	93	of
5	1	1	1	11	3	1767	1074	89	35	92	CO2
5	1	1	1	11	4	1873	1072	216	37	96	emissions
5	1	1	1	11	5	2106	1072	35	37	95	in
5	1	1	1	11	6	2160	1072	140	45	87	2100,“
4	1	1	1	12	0	1572	1270	666	47	-1	
5	1	1	1	12	1	1572	1272	107	35	92	..Not
5	1	1	1	12	2	1695	1270	113	47	93	using
5	1	1	1	12	3	1826	1272	150	35	92	RCP8.5
5	1	1	1	12	4	1992	1274	45	33	96	to
5	1	1	1	12	5	2053	1270	185	37	96	describe
4	1	1	1	13	0	1569	1336	717	47	-1	
5	1	1	1	13	1	1569	1336	72	37	96	the
5	1	1	1	13	2	1661	1336	185	47	95	previous
5	1	1	1	13	3	1864	1338	50	35	95	15
5	1	1	1	13	4	1930	1346	115	37	96	years
5	1	1	1	13	5	2061	1346	189	27	94	assumes
5	1	1	1	13	6	2265	1346	21	27	94	a
4	1	1	1	14	0	1572	1402	675	47	-1	
5	1	1	1	14	1	1572	1402	98	37	96	level
5	1	1	1	14	2	1688	1402	45	37	96	of
5	1	1	1	14	3	1748	1402	220	47	95	mitigation
5	1	1	1	14	4	1985	1402	90	37	95	that
5	1	1	1	14	5	2091	1402	64	37	95	did
5	1	1	1	14	6	2176	1406	71	33	96	not
4	1	1	1	15	0	383	1464	1695	55	-1	
5	1	1	1	15	1	383	1475	45	28	95	Fig.
5	1	1	1	15	2	445	1476	20	21	59	1.
5	1	1	1	15	3	494	1475	66	22	83	Total
5	1	1	1	15	4	572	1475	139	22	96	cumulative
5	1	1	1	15	5	723	1475	50	26	62	CO.
5	1	1	1	15	6	785	1475	119	22	96	emissions
5	1	1	1	15	7	916	1475	61	22	96	since
5	1	1	1	15	8	990	1475	61	22	96	2005
5	1	1	1	15	9	1062	1475	103	28	96	through
5	1	1	1	15	10	1179	1475	66	26	96	2020,
5	1	1	1	15	11	1261	1475	66	26	96	2030,
5	1	1	1	15	12	1341	1475	48	22	96	and
5	1	1	1	15	13	1570	1478	128	35	96	occur,
5	1	1	1	15	14	1715	1469	118	36	95	there
5	1	1	1	15	15	1839	1468	49	47	96	by
5	1	1	1	15	16	1903	1464	175	55	96	skewing
4	1	1	1	16	0	383	1510	1008	29	-1	
5	1	1	1	16	1	383	1512	67	22	96	2050.
5	1	1	1	16	2	463	1512	59	22	96	Data
5	1	1	1	16	3	537	1517	98	17	96	sources:
5	1	1	1	16	4	649	1511	113	23	96	Historical
5	1	1	1	16	5	774	1511	58	23	96	data
5	1	1	1	16	6	845	1510	62	24	96	from
5	1	1	1	16	7	921	1511	82	23	96	Global
5	1	1	1	16	8	1016	1511	91	23	96	Carbon
5	1	1	1	16	9	1122	1512	85	27	96	Project
5	1	1	1	16	10	1220	1511	39	26	96	(6);
5	1	1	1	16	11	1271	1511	120	23	96	emissions
4	1	1	1	17	0	382	1535	1805	46	-1	
5	1	1	1	17	1	369	1530	140	54	96	consistent
5	1	1	1	17	2	508	1530	63	54	93	with
5	1	1	1	17	3	582	1548	57	22	76	RCPs
5	1	1	1	17	4	647	1554	42	16	90	are
5	1	1	1	17	5	697	1547	61	23	90	from
5	1	1	1	17	6	769	1548	48	22	96	RCP
5	1	1	1	17	7	825	1547	116	23	96	Database
5	1	1	1	17	8	948	1548	95	22	96	Version
5	1	1	1	17	9	1052	1548	61	22	93	2.0.5
5	1	1	1	17	10	1111	1530	172	54	55	(https:/tntcat
5	1	1	1	17	11	1282	1530	109	54	58	iiasa.ac.
5	1	1	1	17	12	1570	1535	258	46	96	subsequent
5	1	1	1	17	13	1844	1539	277	32	96	assessments
5	1	1	1	17	14	2138	1535	49	46	96	by
4	1	1	1	18	0	383	1583	1878	29	-1	
5	1	1	1	18	1	383	1584	135	28	46	at/Rq@pDb/);
5	1	1	1	18	2	529	1584	115	23	96	“business
5	1	1	1	18	3	652	1590	26	17	96	as
5	1	1	1	18	4	687	1584	77	23	95	usual”
5	1	1	1	18	5	774	1585	47	22	96	and
5	1	1	1	18	6	832	1584	149	23	96	“business
5	1	1	1	18	7	949	1579	35	37	96	as
5	1	1	1	18	8	991	1584	124	23	96	intended”
5	1	1	1	18	9	1125	1590	42	17	96	are
5	1	1	1	18	10	1175	1583	61	24	96	from
5	1	1	1	18	11	1245	1585	41	22	94	IEA
5	1	1	1	18	12	1293	1585	97	22	96	Current
5	1	1	1	18	13	1711	1601	7	6	34	.
5	1	1	1	18	14	1999	1601	7	6	55	.
5	1	1	1	18	15	2254	1601	7	6	53	.
4	1	1	1	19	0	383	1601	1934	48	-1	
5	1	1	1	19	1	383	1621	91	23	94	Policies
5	1	1	1	19	2	482	1621	48	23	94	and
5	1	1	1	19	3	542	1621	81	23	96	Stated
5	1	1	1	19	4	633	1621	90	23	95	Policies
5	1	1	1	19	5	733	1621	119	26	94	scenarios,
5	1	1	1	19	6	863	1621	145	28	94	respectively
5	1	1	1	19	7	1018	1621	39	26	94	(9).
5	1	1	1	19	8	1068	1598	41	58	93	IEA
5	1	1	1	19	9	1108	1598	64	58	96	data
5	1	1	1	19	10	1188	1620	69	27	96	(fossil
5	1	1	1	19	11	1267	1620	50	24	96	fuel
5	1	1	1	19	12	1327	1620	62	24	96	from
5	1	1	1	19	13	1572	1601	203	46	96	lessening
5	1	1	1	19	14	1789	1601	72	36	96	the
5	1	1	1	19	15	1877	1605	174	42	96	severity
5	1	1	1	19	16	2066	1601	45	36	96	of
5	1	1	1	19	17	2124	1611	193	36	96	warming
4	1	1	1	20	0	382	1659	1766	29	-1	
5	1	1	1	20	1	382	1665	88	23	96	energy
5	1	1	1	20	2	478	1665	43	17	96	use
5	1	1	1	20	3	529	1659	63	29	96	only)
5	1	1	1	20	4	600	1665	48	17	96	was
5	1	1	1	20	5	656	1659	124	23	96	combined
5	1	1	1	20	6	789	1659	56	23	96	with
5	1	1	1	20	7	854	1659	80	23	96	future
5	1	1	1	20	8	941	1659	54	23	96	land
5	1	1	1	20	9	1006	1665	40	17	96	use
5	1	1	1	20	10	1054	1659	49	23	95	and
5	1	1	1	20	11	1114	1659	113	23	95	industrial
5	1	1	1	20	12	1237	1660	117	22	96	emissions
5	1	1	1	20	13	1362	1663	28	19	97	to
5	1	1	1	20	14	1791	1667	7	7	71	.
5	1	1	1	20	15	2019	1667	7	6	60	.
5	1	1	1	20	16	2141	1667	7	6	58	.
4	1	1	1	21	0	382	1663	1882	70	-1	
5	1	1	1	21	1	382	1697	109	22	96	estimate
5	1	1	1	21	2	500	1696	60	23	96	total
5	1	1	1	21	3	572	1697	48	26	65	CO,
5	1	1	1	21	4	632	1697	123	22	95	emissions.
5	1	1	1	21	5	769	1697	82	22	96	Future
5	1	1	1	21	6	864	1696	51	23	96	land
5	1	1	1	21	7	928	1702	43	17	96	use
5	1	1	1	21	8	981	1697	119	22	96	emissions
5	1	1	1	21	9	1110	1696	124	23	96	estimated
5	1	1	1	21	10	1245	1695	62	24	96	from
5	1	1	1	21	11	1320	1696	71	23	96	linear
5	1	1	1	21	12	1571	1667	78	37	96	and
5	1	1	1	21	13	1668	1667	228	37	96	associated
5	1	1	1	21	14	1917	1663	157	70	96	physical
5	1	1	1	21	15	2088	1663	176	70	96	climate
4	1	1	1	22	0	382	1732	1261	38	-1	
5	1	1	1	22	1	382	1733	69	22	96	trend
5	1	1	1	22	2	460	1732	28	23	96	fit
5	1	1	1	22	3	498	1736	27	20	96	to
5	1	1	1	22	4	536	1733	58	22	96	2005
5	1	1	1	22	5	603	1736	29	19	96	to
5	1	1	1	22	6	641	1733	61	23	96	2019
5	1	1	1	22	7	710	1733	82	23	96	Global
5	1	1	1	22	8	802	1733	92	23	96	Carbon
5	1	1	1	22	9	904	1733	86	28	96	Project
5	1	1	1	22	10	1000	1733	53	22	96	land
5	1	1	1	22	11	1064	1739	43	17	96	use
5	1	1	1	22	12	1115	1733	118	23	96	emissions
5	1	1	1	22	13	1241	1733	58	23	96	data
5	1	1	1	22	14	1309	1733	38	26	93	(6).
5	1	1	1	22	15	1359	1734	32	21	90	In-
5	1	1	1	22	16	1572	1733	71	37	96	risk
4	1	1	1	23	0	382	1763	1275	29	-1	
5	1	1	1	23	1	382	1769	94	23	96	dustrial
5	1	1	1	23	2	486	1770	119	22	96	emissions
5	1	1	1	23	3	615	1769	124	23	96	estimated
5	1	1	1	23	4	751	1775	26	17	96	as
5	1	1	1	23	5	790	1770	54	22	96	10%
5	1	1	1	23	6	858	1769	27	23	96	of
5	1	1	1	23	7	894	1769	61	23	95	total
5	1	1	1	23	8	966	1769	123	23	95	emissions.
5	1	1	1	23	9	1102	1769	58	23	96	Final
5	1	1	1	23	10	1174	1770	41	22	95	IEA
5	1	1	1	23	11	1224	1769	59	23	96	data
5	1	1	1	23	12	1294	1775	43	17	93	use
5	1	1	1	23	13	1348	1769	43	23	91	his-
5	1	1	1	23	14	1650	1763	7	7	61	.
4	1	1	1	24	0	382	1805	1009	29	-1	
5	1	1	1	24	1	382	1805	80	23	96	torical
5	1	1	1	24	2	475	1805	80	23	96	values
5	1	1	1	24	3	565	1806	107	28	96	through
5	1	1	1	24	4	684	1806	61	22	96	2020
5	1	1	1	24	5	757	1805	49	23	96	and
5	1	1	1	24	6	817	1806	106	22	96	scenario
5	1	1	1	24	7	935	1806	81	22	96	values
5	1	1	1	24	8	1026	1805	141	23	94	thereafter.
5	1	1	1	24	9	1178	1806	73	22	96	Biotic
5	1	1	1	24	10	1261	1805	130	23	96	feedbacks
4	1	1	1	25	0	383	1841	1008	30	-1	
5	1	1	1	25	1	383	1849	41	16	96	are
5	1	1	1	25	2	435	1845	45	20	96	not
5	1	1	1	25	3	491	1842	108	23	96	included
5	1	1	1	25	4	612	1843	21	21	95	in
5	1	1	1	25	5	645	1849	47	22	93	any
5	1	1	1	25	6	702	1842	125	23	36	IEA-based
5	1	1	1	25	7	839	1843	119	22	96	estimate.
5	1	1	1	25	8	969	1843	62	22	96	Note
5	1	1	1	25	9	1040	1842	55	23	96	that
5	1	1	1	25	10	1107	1843	50	22	96	RCP
5	1	1	1	25	11	1166	1841	90	30	89	forcing
5	1	1	1	25	12	1268	1842	71	23	96	levels
5	1	1	1	25	13	1349	1849	42	16	97	are
4	1	1	1	26	0	383	1878	954	29	-1	
5	1	1	1	26	1	383	1879	115	23	96	intended
5	1	1	1	26	2	507	1882	29	20	96	to
5	1	1	1	26	3	547	1882	122	25	96	represent
5	1	1	1	26	4	677	1879	44	23	96	the
5	1	1	1	26	5	731	1885	51	17	95	sum
5	1	1	1	26	6	792	1878	29	24	95	of
5	1	1	1	26	7	831	1879	70	23	96	biotic
5	1	1	1	26	8	910	1878	129	24	96	feedbacks
5	1	1	1	26	9	1050	1879	49	23	96	and
5	1	1	1	26	10	1109	1879	89	23	95	human
5	1	1	1	26	11	1209	1880	128	22	96	emissions.
4	1	1	1	27	0	377	1923	863	27	-1	
5	1	1	1	27	1	377	1925	92	19	93	Source:
5	1	1	1	27	2	478	1923	109	21	90	Schwalm
5	1	1	1	27	3	596	1925	25	19	96	et
5	1	1	1	27	4	628	1923	28	21	96	al.
5	1	1	1	27	5	664	1925	68	19	96	2020.
5	1	1	1	27	6	743	1923	149	27	96	Proceedings
5	1	1	1	27	7	900	1923	26	21	97	of
5	1	1	1	27	8	931	1923	42	21	96	the
5	1	1	1	27	9	982	1923	103	21	96	National
5	1	1	1	27	10	1092	1923	115	27	96	Academy
5	1	1	1	27	11	1214	1923	26	21	96	of
4	1	1	1	28	0	377	1957	553	29	-1	
5	1	1	1	28	1	377	1961	112	23	96	Sciences,
5	1	1	1	28	2	497	1961	87	25	96	August
5	1	1	1	28	3	592	1961	36	23	96	18,
5	1	1	1	28	4	637	1961	62	19	96	2020
5	1	1	1	28	5	711	1957	5	29	96	|
5	1	1	1	28	6	727	1959	44	21	94	vol.
5	1	1	1	28	7	780	1961	45	19	94	117
5	1	1	1	28	8	838	1957	4	29	95	|
5	1	1	1	28	9	855	1965	38	15	95	no.
5	1	1	1	28	10	901	1961	29	19	95	33
4	1	1	1	29	0	1120	2031	503	20	-1	
5	1	1	1	29	1	1120	2031	141	20	68	Gional
5	1	1	1	29	2	1276	2031	120	20	88	Mean
5	1	1	1	29	3	1411	2031	81	20	76	>ea
5	1	1	1	29	4	1507	2031	116	20	32	Level
4	1	1	1	30	0	490	2054	64	23	-1	
5	1	1	1	30	1	490	2054	64	23	95	100
4	1	1	1	31	0	508	2122	1071	42	-1	
5	1	1	1	31	1	508	2141	46	23	94	90
5	1	1	1	31	2	644	2129	154	9	62	———
5	1	1	1	31	3	809	2122	68	23	92	ESA
5	1	1	1	31	4	888	2122	136	23	92	Climate
5	1	1	1	31	5	1037	2122	135	28	95	Change
5	1	1	1	31	6	1185	2122	154	23	75	Initiative
5	1	1	1	31	7	1352	2123	136	28	63	(St_cci)
5	1	1	1	31	8	1500	2123	79	21	96	data
4	1	1	1	32	0	504	2207	719	47	-1	
5	1	1	1	32	1	504	2207	47	47	73	B80
5	1	1	1	32	2	644	2218	154	10	67	—
5	1	1	1	32	3	809	2212	81	22	95	Near
5	1	1	1	32	4	904	2212	76	22	93	Real
5	1	1	1	32	5	995	2212	86	22	88	Tirme
5	1	1	1	32	6	1091	2212	132	27	90	jason-3
4	1	1	1	33	0	511	2311	1398	25	-1	
5	1	1	1	33	1	511	2313	43	23	68	70
5	1	1	1	33	2	1886	2311	23	20	41	iA
4	1	1	1	34	0	1842	2346	29	41	-1	
5	1	1	1	34	1	1842	2346	29	41	29	eh
4	1	1	1	35	0	385	2372	1435	51	-1	
5	1	1	1	35	1	385	2372	52	51	27	ti
5	1	1	1	35	2	1787	2380	33	34	56	Gl
4	1	1	1	36	0	411	2399	1357	47	-1	
5	1	1	1	36	1	411	2415	28	31	47	E
5	1	1	1	36	2	508	2400	46	23	94	60
5	1	1	1	36	3	1731	2399	37	27	0	f
4	1	1	1	37	0	411	2448	28	32	-1	
5	1	1	1	37	1	411	2448	28	32	7	E
4	1	1	1	38	0	402	2457	1290	82	-1	
5	1	1	1	38	1	402	2483	152	26	36	3°
5	1	1	1	38	2	1619	2457	73	82	50	of
4	1	1	1	39	0	402	2509	1046	95	-1	
5	1	1	1	39	1	402	2509	152	94	34	Ew
4	1	1	1	40	0	403	2604	988	78	-1	
5	1	1	1	40	1	403	2616	37	66	43	3
5	1	1	1	40	2	1284	2604	107	52	69	=
4	1	1	1	41	0	510	2658	44	24	-1	
5	1	1	1	41	1	510	2658	44	24	96	30
4	1	1	1	42	0	1136	2699	41	21	-1	
5	1	1	1	42	1	1136	2699	41	21	17	NI
4	1	1	1	43	0	509	2744	45	24	-1	
5	1	1	1	43	1	509	2744	45	24	96	20
4	1	1	1	44	0	1007	2769	17	14	-1	
5	1	1	1	44	1	1007	2769	17	14	5	-
4	1	1	1	45	0	848	2782	126	42	-1	
5	1	1	1	45	1	861	2796	16	30	44	ye
5	1	1	1	45	2	904	2786	49	31	82	—
5	1	1	1	45	3	952	2782	22	42	40	J
4	1	1	1	46	0	511	2831	316	31	-1	
5	1	1	1	46	1	511	2831	43	22	96	10
5	1	1	1	46	2	691	2846	49	16	0	hn
5	1	1	1	46	3	809	2832	18	27	0	AR)
4	1	1	1	47	0	532	2917	22	23	-1	
5	1	1	1	47	1	537	2913	9	36	30	Oo
4	1	1	1	48	0	497	3003	57	24	-1	
5	1	1	1	48	1	497	3003	57	24	91	-10
4	1	1	1	49	0	531	3034	1626	23	-1	
5	1	1	1	49	1	531	3034	85	23	96	1993
5	1	1	1	49	2	650	3034	84	23	95	1995
5	1	1	1	49	3	769	3034	82	23	96	1997
5	1	1	1	49	4	887	3035	85	22	94	1999
5	1	1	1	49	5	1002	3034	87	23	94	2001
5	1	1	1	49	6	1120	3034	89	23	96	2003
5	1	1	1	49	7	1239	3034	89	23	96	2005
5	1	1	1	49	8	1358	3034	87	23	96	2007
5	1	1	1	49	9	1476	3034	88	23	95	2009
5	1	1	1	49	10	1595	3034	85	23	96	2011
5	1	1	1	49	11	1714	3034	86	23	96	2013
5	1	1	1	49	12	1832	3034	86	23	96	2015
5	1	1	1	49	13	1950	3034	87	23	95	2017
5	1	1	1	49	14	2068	3034	89	23	95	2019
4	1	1	1	50	0	1260	3082	221	35	-1	
5	1	1	1	50	1	1260	3082	119	28	95	Time
5	1	1	1	50	2	1396	3082	85	35	95	(yr)
4	1	1	1	51	0	2005	3313	238	44	-1	
5	1	1	1	51	1	2005	3313	105	44	96	Page
5	1	1	1	51	2	2125	3314	23	34	95	5
5	1	1	1	51	3	2164	3313	42	35	95	of
5	1	1	1	51	4	2220	3314	23	33	93	7

Section 6

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES   8 OCTOBER 2021




                               Page 6 of 7

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES                                 8 OCTOBER 2021

                              Single Event Probability
           00%                       Es             >__» ____¢
           ow |e
         gant     | A        Lee | | |)
         rm      if l-t |             | ep} |

         sam    f/f | a          | [eer] [ |
         2am | f/f              ee     | |
         BonttiplA~    ler |          |    |     |    |
           mn Pat |                {| |     |      {| |    |    |
            wero       |   |     |    |    |     |      fT  |    |
              0    10   20   30   40    50   60   70    80   90   100
                                No. of years of observation period
                            =O 10% —O=5% —O=2% —O=—1%
       Figure 1: Probability of observing a single event of a given magnitude in an observation period.
     Source: Noosa Council. 2021. CHAP Roundtable Briefing Note
              Cost Benefit Analysis (p.26 CHAP)

                                                             Page 6 of 7

Section 7

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES   8 OCTOBER 2021




                               Page 7 of 7

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES                                                       8 OCTOBER 2021

       Table E1   Summary results — Net Present Value (NPV), discount rate of 2.3%, costs and
                  benefits assessed for period 2020-2100
                     Options
        Location     Option 2       Option 3    Option 4     Option 5     Option 6     Option 7
        Eastern      $63m           $239m       -$2773m      -$222m       -$70m        $73m
        NPV                J
        Beaches

        Teewah       $0.3m          -$17m       -$67m        $16m         $9m          n/a
        NPV

                      2. Dune        2.Dune = 4. Seawalls in 5. Acquisition             7. Changes to
                   revegetation &  revegetation.  high risk   of high risk                planning
                   management     augmentation    locations   properties                   Scheme
                                 & management

        Source: Aither. 2020. Noosa Shire Council CHAP Cost Benefit Analysis

                                                                                     Page 7 of 7

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.