Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Original source · versioned page text

PM Submission Object 1 of 2 - Richard Kirkpatrick MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

of 8

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                 From:                     Suellen Kirkpatrick
                 Sent:                     24 Apr 2017 07:14:25 +1000
                 To:                       Mailbox Council Mail
                 Subject:                  Fwd: ProposalSubmissionEnvironment(Rick)
                 Attachments:              Notice of Submission Environment(Rick).doc




                 Sent from my iPhone

                 Begin forwarded message:


                         From: Richard KirkPatrick <[email protected]>
                         Date: 22 April 2017 at 8:10:28 pm AEST
                         To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
                         Subject: ProposalSubmissionEnvironment(Rick)




                         This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole use of the
                         intended recipient(s). This confidentiality is not waived or lost, if you receive it and you are
                         not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/received in error.

                         Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this email is strictly
                         prohibited. The information contained in this email, including any attachment sent with it,
                         may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality if it relates to health service matters.

                         If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this email in error, you are
                         asked to immediately notify the sender. You should also delete this email, and any copies,
                         from your computer system network and destroy any hard copies produced.

                         If not an intended recipient of this email, you must not copy, distribute or take any action(s)
                         that relies on it; any form of disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this
                         email is also prohibited.

                         Although the Queensland Ambulance Service takes all reasonable steps to ensure this
                         email does not contain malicious software, the Queensland Ambulance Service does not
                         accept responsibility for the consequences if any person's computer inadvertently suffers
                         any disruption to services, loss of information, harm or is infected with a virus, other
                         malicious computer programme or code that may occur as a consequence of receiving this
                         email.

                         Unless stated otherwise, this email represents only the views of the sender and not the
                         views of the Queensland Government.

                         ********************************************************************************

                         The content presented in this publication is distributed by the Queensland Government as
                         an information source only. The State of Queensland makes no statements, representations




Document Set ID: 20306956
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017
Log in to download the original file

PM Submission Object 1 of 2 - Richard Kirkpatrick MCU16_0153 & REC16_0041.pdf · 1.1 MB (small file)

Full text of the other 7 pages

Page 2

                         or warranties about the accuracy, completeness or reliability of any information contained in
                         this publication. The State of Queensland disclaims all responsibility and all liability
                         (including without limitation for liability in negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages and
                         costs you might incur as a result of the information being inaccurate or incomplete in any
                         way, and for any reason reliance was placed on such information.




Document Set ID: 20306956
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017

Page 3

                                                                                                       Notice of Submission under the
                                                                                                        Sustainable Planning Act 2009


     To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that:
     1. be made to the assessment manager
     2. be in writing
     3. be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronically
     4. state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission
     5. state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why
     6. be received by Council during the formal public notification period
     As required by the Sustainable Planning Act, all submissions, including individual details, are published on Council’s website and
     therefore will be accessible to internet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whether or not they are properly
     made.

     1. Application details
     File No MCU 16/0153 & REC16/0041
     Postal address of Land (as advertised) 215 DAVID LOW WAY, PEREGIAN BEACH
     Nature of Proposed Development MULTIPLE HOUSING –TYPE 4 CONVECTIONAL, VISITOR ACCOMODATION

     2. Submitter details
     Full name of Submitter Richard Bowden Kirkpatrick
     Email Address [email protected]
     Postal address 28 Currawong Cresent
     Suburb Peregian Beach                                                    State Qld                              Postcode 4573
     Signature(s)
     N.B.   This form has been designed for the convenience of the public, and any persons wishing to lodge a submission are not obliged to use this form.


     3. Details of Submission
     I (We), make the following submission:
     Mr Patrick Murphy,

     The Assessment Officer,

     Noosa Shire Council

     [email protected]

     Dear Mr Murphy,

                                    Submission in opposition to the Development Application

                                                             MCU 16/0153 & REC16/0041




     Privacy
     Council will use any personal information provided for the intended purpose only and for remaining in contact with you. Council is authorised to collect
     this information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other Local Government Acts. Your personal information is only accessed by
     persons authorised to do so. Your personal information is dealt with in accordance with council’s privacy policy.


     www.noosa.qld.gov.au                        [email protected]                       T 07 5329 6500
     PO Box 141 Tewantin Qld 4565                                                            ABN 97 969 214 121

Document Set ID: 20306956
                                                                                                                                                  Page 1 of 6
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017

Page 4

     The DA makes no mention of any creek or watercourse in the plans. I object to the DA on the basis that it does
     not take into account damage to the environment that has already occurred, nor future negative impacts on the
     environment. Please review the information below that supports my concerns. However, from the attached
     photographs taken on Sunday 16 April 2017, you will see that a creek or watercourse runs through the site.




     The building on the left is the IGA Supermarket and the fence is where the proposed access road will enter the
     site. The slope behind the IGA is where the Hotel is proposed to be built with the access road passing in front
     on the right.

     Much of the ground in the foreground is very “springy” from being waterlogged and covered in mulch.




Document Set ID: 20306956
                                                                                                           Page 2 of 6
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017

Page 5

     This photo again shows the creek or watercourse to the right of the above photo and some of the many trees
     which have been chopped down despite the lapsed approval requiring them to be retained “except where
     required to be removed due to building operations”. There have been no building operations.




     The following Google Earth aerial photo clearly shows the creek/watercourse running through the site behind
     the IGA supermarket where the developer plans to build the Hotel and the access road to the housing
     development is proposed to go farther to the west where the creek/watercourse runs.




Document Set ID: 20306956
                                                                                                        Page 3 of 6
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017

Page 6

     Division 14 – Overall outcomes for the Eastern Beaches Locality at 7.10 states:-

              “Environment and cultural heritage values




Document Set ID: 20306956
                                                                                        Page 4 of 6
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017

Page 7

     O10 There are no significant adverse effects on biodiversity, natural vegetation etc…including those related to-
              a) changes to natural drainage;
              b) …
              c) disturbance of the …wetland system;
              d) …


     The Covey Associates Pty Ltd Engineering Services Report of March 2017 states:

     “The interface with the western boundary to the Council reserve will require approximately 2.0m of fill to be
     placed. It is proposed that a rock filled gabion wall is constructed along this boundary to retain the fill material.
     The proposed retaining structure would be subject to Geotechnical investigation and advice to determine an
     appropriate design. The photograph below (Figure 6), illustrates the ‘swampy’ nature of the lower area of the
     site in the vicinity of the proposed gabion wall.

     Along the southern boundary with the Noosa National Park, a ‘fill’ wall of approximately 2.0m will be required.
     These walls will most likely be of a concrete sleeper, or similar, construction. This would continue the existing
     wall in-situ.

     Along the northern boundary, ‘fill’ walls of approximately 1.5m height will be required. These walls will most
     likely be of a concrete sleeper, or similar, construction.”



     While the Report speaks of the ‘Swampy’ nature of the area it does not refer to the creek or watercourse.
     Likewise, it does not refer to the fact that the gabion wall will be on the bank of or in the bed of the creek
     requiring footings to suit.

     The development will result in changes to the natural drainage of the site and disturbance of the wetland
     system contrary to the Noosa Plan. I submit that Noosa Council should refuse approval to develop under these
     circumstances.



     The developer should now be requested to provide a detailed survey of the site showing the location of the
     creek/watercourse in relation to the site boundaries and the proposed location of the Wallum Houses numbers
     10 to 13. The developer should also be required to provide plans and appropriate expert advice on what is
     proposed in regard to the creek/watercourse.



     Perusal of the latest version of the DA shows that the applicant did not tick the box (Item 7) indicating that
     there is a watercourse in the site. There is a watercourse on the site and this is plainly misleading. Noosa
     Council must clarify why the applicant did not indicate the true situation and cannot grant approval for the DA
     until this question has been answered and the implications of the fact that there is a watercourse have been
     fully resolved. The DA covers a site that abuts directly onto a Noosa National Parks National Park and this is a
     serious issue.



     Until this information is provided neither the Council nor the community are in a position to assess the
     development and can only oppose it.




Document Set ID: 20306956
                                                                                                                 Page 5 of 6
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017

Page 8

     (if necessary, use separate sheet of paper and attach)




Document Set ID: 20306956
                                                              Page 6 of 6
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.