Decision Notice OPW25-0012 · OPW25/0012

Page 12 of 14


[OCR of page images]
2506-46370 SRA

Attachment 3—Reasons for referral agency response

 

[Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)

The reasons for the SARA’s decision are:
* SARA assessed the development against the following code of the SDAP, version 3.2:
© State code 25: Development in South East Queensland koala habitat areas (State code 25).

* With conditions, the development complies with the assessment benchmarks of State code 25 of the
SDAP in that the development:
© does not cause an unacceptable impact on mapped koala habitat areas;
© is designed and located to avoid impacts or, where the matters of state environmental
significance cannot be reasonably avoided, impacts are reasonably minimised and mitigated;
© results in @ significant residual impact that is acceptable, and an offset is provided.

Material used in the assessment of the application:

the development application maternal and submitted plans
Planning Act 2016

Planning Regulation 2017

the SDAP (version 3.2), as published by SARA

the Development Assessment Rules

SARA DA Mapping system

section 58 of the Human Rights Act 2019

Attachment 4—Representations about a referral agency response
provisions

 

(page left intentionally blank)

State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 6 of 7

Page 12 of 14