Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

Meyer Judgment Sealed

of 90

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file (22.3 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Original PDF page 26, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

                                               4


Using the above parameters, the stormwater discharge in the pre-development and post-
development scenarios to Noosa Drive were calculated as shown in Appendix B and
summarised in Table 1 and Table 2. The results demonstrate that the peak flow discharge from
the site is increased in the post-development case. Therefore, detention of the peak
stormwater discharges is required.

              Table 1 – Site peak flow discharging to Noosa Drive (current climate)


                                             Peak Flow (l/s)
        AEP
                   Pre-development        Post-Development             Difference

        10%                37                      38                      +1
        1%                 60                      62                      +2


               Table 2 – Site peak flow discharging to Noosa Drive (2100 climate)


                                             Peak Flow (l/s)
        AEP
                   Pre-development        Post-Development             Difference

        10%                44                      46                      +2
        1%                 72                      74                      +2


  Table 3 – Infiltration trench bypass peak flow discharging to Noosa Drive (current climate)


                                             Peak Flow (l/s)
                                AEP
                                          Trench Bypass only

                                10%                 7
                                 1%                 12


The detention tank and outlets were designed in accordance with the following guideline:

   •   “On-site Underground Detention Storage Orifice Plate Sizing for Deemed-to-comply
       Detention: Fact Sheet” by Sunshine Coast Council (2018)

The detention tank storage volume was calculated as shown below:

                    𝐷𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = 90 𝑚3 ⁄𝐻𝑎 × 0.0723 𝐻𝑎 = 6.5 𝑚3

Therefore, the required detention tank volume is 6.5 m3. A detention tank, in the form of an
infiltration trench, with 6.5 m3 has been proposed for each lot.




                                                                                                25
Log in to download the original file

Meyer Judgment Sealed.pdf · 22.3 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.