Original source · versioned page text
Meyer Judgment Sealed
Very large file (22.3 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 50, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
tecténic PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT bed Rie tte 39 PICTURE POINT CRESCENT, NOOSA HEADS Executive Summary This report details the results of a geotechnical investigation undertaken for a proposed residential development at 39 Picture Point Crescent, Noosa Heads. The investigation was performed by Tectonic for HM Property Pty Ltd. The investigation comprised drilling of boreholes at two locations across accessible areas of the development footprint, together with in-situ soil strength testing. One stand-alone in situ strength test (using the dynamic cone penetrometer method) was also undertaken. This report summarises the results of the investigation and provides geotechnical recommendations regarding earthworks and footings, together with temporary and permanent retention. Based on the provided information we understand that it is proposed to reconfigure a single existing lot (Lot 2 on RP220514) in to two separate lots being an equitable 723 m? in land area. Concept architectural drawings provided to us with the project brief indicate that following subdivision, each new lot may be developed with residences, reaching up to four storeys height. The extent of earthworks cuts or the nature of the proposed structures has not been indicated on the drawings provided, and the findings of this assessment should be reviewed once detailed architectural drawings are available (to confirm feasibility). The subsurface conditions encountered in the boreholes, and inferred from deeper DCP testing at the boreholes, are summarised as follows: « — Fill — comprising very loose to loose sands (encountered in borehole BHT-2 only) to a depth of 0.7 m BGL; then, or from ground surface level in borehole BHT-1 » Natural Sands: © being very loose to depths of between 1 m and 2 m BGL; then o loose to between 2 m and 3.6 m BGL; underlain by o medium dense sands to between 3.8 m and 4.6 m BGL; followed by o dense sands to the testing termination depths of between 4.8 m and 5.6 m BGL. No signs of groundwater seepage (‘springs’) were observed during our walk-over. Groundwater was not encountered in the boreholes at the time of the investigation. The sand dune slope to the rear of this site is close to the ‘limit of equilibrium’ (at an inclination of just over 30°), and thus relatively shallow, translational movements could be expected in such a situation. Deep seated, global instability impacting the proposed residential structures at this site is unlikely to occur provided that the footing system is adequately designed. It is assessed that where piles are taken to found a minimum of 7 min to the underlying dense sands and below a line at 28° drawn to extend upwards from the toe of the slope (taken to be from Noosa Drive approximately), a Low Risk of slope instability (to property) would apply. In an adverse case, where ongoing near surface instability occurs on the dune face below the proposed buildings, and retrogresses; it is possible that the piles may become exposed above the ground surface temporarily. Thus, some form of lateral capacity must be allowed for in the pile design to address this. A grout ‘curtain’ must be installed along the northern edge of the buildings (at the slope crest) to a depth of no less than 6 m. The plane extending at 28° from the toe has also been used to inform the need for protection to the side boundaries. It is possible that sand would be removed from neighbouring properties with ongoing instability on the dune slope, which has the potential to affect the subject site where the building envelopes do not extend as far north/downslope. The grout curtain should also extend from the northern edge of the building envelopes, and south along each respective site boundary for about 10 m, tapering from 6 m deep at the northern end. All excess stormwater collected around the residence (including overflow from rainwater tanks etc.) must be directed by pipes or lined channels to the nearest legal point of discharge. Where possible, utilising a ‘wet’ or ‘charged’ system where necessary, stormwater collected from the roof and other elevated hard surfaces should be piped to discharge into the kerb along Picture Point Crescent. Where this can only be designed to take some flows; stormwater will need to be directed to the dune slope to the north (ultimately leading to the road reserve for Noosa Drive), where it is suggested that an RPEQ designed stormwater dissipation and infiltration device should be installed. The device must be designed and constructed to ensure a non- worsening impact from stormwater runoff on the neighbouring properties/infrastructure down slope. 10 February 2023 Report No. 22511-001-RevO ii 49
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.