Original source · versioned page text
Meyer Judgment Sealed
Very large file (22.3 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 73, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Borehole No. <e- = geetectncal erwronmental engines BHT-2 Page 1 of 1 Engineering Log - Borehole Project No.: 22511 Client: HM Property Pty Ltd Commenced: 16/1/2023 Project Name: Proposed Residential Development Completed: 16/1/2023 Hole Location: 39 Picture Point Crescent Logged By: MS Hole Position: 509075.0 m E 7081090.0 m N MGA2020 Zone 56 Checked By: RKG Drill Model and Mounting: | 4WD Auger Inclination: -90° RL Surface: No survey Hole Diameter: 100 mm Bearing: 360° Datum: AHD Operator: Tectonic | Drilling Information Material Description and Observations 2 oo . 5 5 ; 2 DCP TEST & Samples | | gz a Material Description 2(28| ae (AS 1289.6.3.2-1997) 3| § Tests 5 2|8s soil type: plasticity or particle characteristics, | 25/20 UCS Blows per 100 mm £] € |B] Remarks [8] a Decth & 98 secondary and minor components, colour 2523) (pay = s 3 a s SS). eS Z| (m) | (m | o | oe 38/82 gggsgio 5 10 1 2 2% Baee ; ; I ‘SAND (FILL), fine grained, grey, trace of fine to | HW T | | | 4 medium sized sub-angular gravel, trace of root VL | Hw | | | | fragments HW | | | | 4 |__| veil I | \ | \ I | + | \ \ | t ‘SAND, fine grained, grey | a —AINATURAL) 4 te | becoming pale grey | | | | | | |e | \ | | 3 | ‘| 3 i | | | | | es | \ \ I | | 8 | | | | | < (fai | | | \ | | Ws | | | | | | | | | i | | | | I | | g | }—| | | I | | 4 | | \ | | \ 8 | | \ | | 5 | | | | \ | a | | | | | | | ms | | | 1g Pak x ] becoming fine to medium grained, poorly graded | | 5 : m . wae ‘Augeyed to3.m | | diy Hole Terminated at 3.00 m 1 | 3 4 Target depth | i Wl \ | al ft iil | | | | ay [till \ \ i 4 | | | ep ttl | \ | al flit 1 | | | g} ft | | | a) fit aT | | | | fill l J | | a til! | gy litt | \ a} Jlili 1 | | | S) ttl | | | 3 7 | aa | | yi S| | | : i 4 | | i Lill \ | | a} [itil 1 | | =} [tttl | 8 Wt ‘| 1 | | | Fe J || | a flit 1 || | \ 3 Li bl] L L i Ll Z Method Penetration Water Samples and Tests Moisture Condition Consistency/Relative Density 5] AD/T-Auger Drilling TC Bit - Zz Ui### - Undisturbed Sample (### mm) D - Dy VS - Very Soft =) ADIV-Auger Driling V Bit BE ey Eey 3 Level (Date) 5" - Disturbed Sample M. = Moist S - Soft 3] RT - Rolary Tri-cone Bit Eee, > Inflow BDS- Bulk Disturbed Sample W - Wet F - Firm 2] RD - Rotary Drilling a <1 Partial Loss SPT - Standard Penetration Test Vst - Very Stiff 3] NMLC -Rock Core H - Hard ~<a Complete Loss H_ = Hard 2] HA- Hand Auger VH - Very hard P Plastic Limit Vi = Very Loose 3 Graphic Log/Core Loss ificatic a - Loose 5 Core recovered (hatching Classification Symbols and < PL Wo’ Medina Dees 3 indicates material) Soi Descriptions - = PL Up > vee e | 1k Core toss Based on Unified Soil <IPt ery Dense 2 Classification System Fr__- Friable 72
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.