Original source · versioned page text
2015-04-28 Planning and Organisation Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (22.1 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 28 APRIL 2015
Page 191 of 211
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 28 APRIL 2015
3. The intensity of the potential impact on affected businesses.
4. Whether particular businesses will incur a disproportionate impact.
5. The duration of the impact.
4. Outcome of preliminary assessment
No significant impacts identified
If it is determined by the local government that there are no significant impacts from the anti-
competitive provisions, the local government is not required to undertake any further review
of the anti-competitive provisions but must notify the community of the existence of the anti-
competitive provision when making the local law.
It is noted that in accordance with the assessment table commencing at page 5 (below),
none of the identified anti-competitive provisions are considered significant in terms of
potential impact on business to warrant a comprehensive public benefit review. The reasons
for this determination are as follows:
1. Only one submission was received relating to an anti-competitive provision during the
public consultation period, and this submission was regarding the following proposed
prohibited advertising devices LED lit signage and signage such as bunting, which
can move in the wind. It is noted that the relevant proposed local law permits
business to have other signage, including some signage, which does not require an
application to be made to Council. Accordingly, it is not considered that the intensity
of impact on business caused by this submission is not. significant.
2. Any potentially anti-competitive provisions contained with proposed local law No 2
(Animal Management) and proposed subordinate local law No 2, are excluded from
assessment on the grounds that the laws are to ensure accepted public health and
safety standards are met.
3. The assessed probability of impacts on business relating to the other identified anti-
competitive provisions in the proposed local laws is considered low. It is important to
note that the intent of the provisions is to ensure expected community standards are
adhered to.
3. No particular business will incur a disproportionate impact from the provisions and all
businesses across the Shire will be treated the same.
6. Notification
In light of the assessment of anti-competitive provisions in the proposed local laws and
subordinate local laws, if the laws are endorsed by Council as recommended, Noosa Council
must note in the minutes that the relevant laws contain anti-competitive provisions.
4
Page 191 of 211See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.