Original source · versioned page text
2015-04-28 Planning and Organisation Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (22.1 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 28 APRIL 2015
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF SUBMISSIONS
Five submissions were received from Bushland Care Groups (2), an Environment Group (1),
an individual concerned about the use of 1080 and a head petitioner with 269 signatures,
also concerned about the use of 1080. The table below provides a summary of these
submissions with recommendations.
Topic Comments Recommendation Edits to PMP draft
Change scientific name of The scientific name Seek expert opinion
dingo from Canis familiaris in the PMP is and if necessary
dingo to Canis dingo consistent with State amend scientific name.
Government No change at present.
Biosecurity Qld
listings.
Impact of domestic pets It is acknowledged Council Local Laws
and foster responsible pet that domestic pets continue to educate
ownership can impact on other and enforce animal
domestic animals management by-laws
and wildlife. within current work
priorities. This is
identified as an action
in the PMP.
Use of 1080 should be There are different Until an effective P10 After first
stopped in Noosa Shire opinions on the use alternative solution to paragraph of Case
because of animal of 1080. Some 1080 is developed, Study:
suffering, impacts on non- residents are then discontinuing its
target species and human strongly opposed use is not supported. There are a number of
health issues. One because of animal This is consistent with methods of wild dog
submitter has provided a cruelty concerns. the Qld State Wild Dog control. Examples
petition with 268 Some landholders Management Strategy include baiting with
signatures use 1080 as an 2011-2016. It is 1080 poison, trapping,
effective measure to acknowledged that fencing and guardian
control wild dogs that there are other more animals. 1080 is
attack their stock. costly methods of feral considered the most
Council has sought animal control that may practical measure for
expert advice on the be used on a case by keeping wild dog
matter. Expert case basis such as populations under
advice states there is trapping and fencing. control. It is likely to
little evidence to This information is to continue as the
support claims of be included in the preferred method of
suffering by animals PMP. control until other
and alternative alternatives are
methods such as available that are
cage trapping can be equal to, or more,
quite stressful to wild effective.
animals.
In terms of impacts
on non-target
species, expert
advice is that 1080
used in correct
dosages has little
impact on native
fauna. 1080 breaks
down quite quickly
and is short lived.
Page 62 of 211
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.