Original source · versioned page text
2015-04-28 Planning and Organisation Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (22.1 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 28 APRIL 2015
Topic Comments Recommendation Edits to PMP draft
Give ‘Objective 7.2 Supported. Amend P28 Action 7.2
Review Environmentally Action Plan Objective Replace with
Significant Areas’, a 7.2 to include
higher priority and consult Bushcare Groups. Review
with Bushcare Groups. Environmentally
Significant Areas
within the shire in
consultation with
Environment and
Bushland Care Groups
and identify additional
areas for possible
inclusion as
designated ESA's
Under the Action Plan The PMP is a four The suggestion is
Responsibilities heading, year strategic level supported in principle
specify actual document. State and except that it is
departments, officers and Local Government recommended such
committees Departments and detail not be included
local organisations in the PMP, but rather
sometimes re- as an online listing that
structure, change can be easily updated
responsibilities and and attached to the
contact details PMP as an addendum
change. on an annual basis.
Re-write objective 1 to This is a broad No change
specify a process, rather objective. The recommended
than an outcome process is the PMP
Working Group
meeting on a 6
monthly basis
Amend Action 1.1 Supported. P25 Action 1.1 Under
Establish a Working Success Indicator
Group: make Column replace with:
responsibilities clearer
A PMP Working Group
meeting is held every
6 months to review the
PMP and make
recommendations, in
consultation with
stakeholders
Under Responsibilities
column replace with:
The PMP Working
Group will be
coordinated by Council
and will be seeking
feedback from key
stakeholders on the
effectiveness of the
PMP.
Page 65 of 211
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.