Original source · versioned page text
NPM Submission - D Geddes - LATE - Proforma - MCU21/0110
lloosa Springs
Obiection to the Proposed Hotel at I
flncu Lrlcrrro
period of time just be/ore
opened for comment for a short
lt has nCIt gone unnoriced that this DA has been
occupied or awey^
Christmas when most people are otherwise
existing users of
Town pranning Report of the impact upon
No anarysis has been provided in the Adamson "material change of
This impact is significant" The
Noos springs Resort, incrudtng mernbers and residents. parkrrdge, Erysium and rhe Fairways {795
wilr adversery affect every person in Noosa springs, The oasis,
use,,
properties)' resort staff and members'
The development fails so many tests;
of rooms aS the FrenCh Q'Uarter in
I lt isn't 'boutique", in fact it witl have roughly the same number
Hastings Street
r At 1?rn high it will visuatly overpower existing buildings
r land zoned "recreational and open space"
Two thirds of the development is to be built on
r lt breaches height and setback restrictions
r zoning maps indicate it is a "core Koala Habitaf, "a Koala PrioritY Habitat" and this will
be lost
together with other fauna and flora
existing fire evacuation
r with potentially 224 occupants, plus children and additional staff, the already
risk will be significantly increased with Botentially disas$ous
ramifications' Numerous discussions
e.g. The oasis BC fieview of
with council in the past has done little to alleviate this veryserious issue
Ernergency Evacuation Provisions
o wheels or public transport'
The DA suggests that the guests and staff will be arriving and leaving on 2
This is just not realistic
r An already busy carpark will be inadequate for guests, staff, golfers and those who use the spa. gym,
medical facilities, restauraftt etc. lt is already over capacity at peak firnes and the Parking
Studie:
lack meaningful analYsis
r There will be increased noise and activity in an area where many elderly people reside and will affect
the quiet enjoyment and wellbeing of residents and potentially their security and safety
r The club house, goff course, gym, restaurant, spa and pool will not be as evailable to residents and
members with Tee Times likely to be at a premium as hotel guests will likely be given priority
r The developers are pote ntially "double-dippingl' as the land originally earmarked for a hatelwas used
te build Parkridge.
Many of the abeve serve to undermine the integrity of the Noosa Plan 2020.
I objefi to the Application for the proposed hotel on the above grounds"
hp*,5*m": r$f r: l*t
iri;: r': uo te
I ilt ,8,^,{ t fr*o*;L*r*- k** e-l{ t+tlv
Document Set ID: 21743030
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/12/2021
[OCR of page images]
Objection to the Proposed Hotel at Noosa Springs
Mau ZNanio
it has not gone unnoticed that this DA has been opened for comment for a short period of time just before
Christmas when most people are otherwise accupied or away.
the Adamson Town Planning Report of the impact upon existing users of
dents. This impact is significant. The “material change of
The Oasis, Parkridge, Elysium and The Fairways (795
No analysis has been provided in
Noosa Springs Resort, including members and resi
use” will adversely affect every person in Noosa Springs,
properties), resort staff and members.
The development fails so many tests:
« Itisn’t “boutique”, in fact it will have roughly the same number of rooms as the French Quarter in
Hastings Street
e At 12m high it will visually overpower existing buildings
e Two thirds of the development is to be built on land zoned “recreational and open space”
e it breaches height and setback restrictions
e Zoning maps indicate it is a “Core Koala Habitat”, “a Koala Priority Habitat” and this will be lost
together with other fauna and flora
e With potentially 224 occupants, plus children and additional staff, the already existing fire evacuation
risk will be significantly increased with potentially disastrous ramifications. Numerous discussions
with Council in the past has done little to alleviate this very serious issue e.g. The Oasis BC Review of
Emergency Evacuation Provisions
® The DA suggests that the guests and staff will be arriving and leaving on 2 wheels or public transport.
This is just not realistic
® Analready busy carpark will be inadequate for guests, staff, golfers and those who use the spa, gym,
medical facilities, restaurant etc. It is already over capacity at peak times and the Parking Studies
lack meaningful analysis
e There will be increased noise and activity in an area where many elderly people reside and will affect
the quiet enjoyment and wellbeing of residents and potentially their security and safety
* The club house, golf course, gym, restaurant, spa and pool will not be as available to residents and
members with Tee Times likely to be at a premium as hotel guests will likely be given priority
« The developers are potentially “double-dipping” as the land originally earmarked for a hotel was used
te build Parkridge.
Many of the above serve to undermine the integrity of the Noosa Plan 2020.
| object to the Application for the proposed hotel on the above grounds.
TE SWMAFE UC Cort, Stamshine Beene (ld EStP
Document Set ID: 21743030
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/12/2021
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (NPM Submission - D Geddes - LATE - Proforma - MCU21_0110.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.