Original source · versioned page text
Appendix I - Bushfire
Attached to the e-mail Multiple Housing Type 3 Retirement & Special Needs (48 units) - MCU18/0009.
[7]
Characteristic Input/output value
Potential Bushfire Hazard Class High
1 – the VHC 22.1-Melaleuca open forests on seasonally inundated lowland coastal swamps was used because
2 – the Potential fuel load is attributed with a potential fuel load by the State Government as part of the Leonard et. al.
(2014) methodology.
3 – the FFDI for the area is determined by the State Government as part of the Leonard et. al. (2014) methodology.
We also acknowledge that while the Lomandra Place Bushland Reserve is an area of low bushfire
hazard, it may become involved in a bushfire event and as such needs to achieve a separation from that
vegetation necessary to achieve the radiant heat flux of 19kW/m2.
Table 3 provides the outputs for potential setbacks from the retained vegetation. We acknowledge the
age and vulnerability of the residents using the proposed development and recommend that the setback
should achieve a lower radiant heat level than necessary for the residents.
Table 3 – Minimum Distance Calculations
186 Cooroy Noosa Road, Tewantin - Minimum Distance Calculator - AS3959-2009 (Method 2)
Inputs Outputs
Fire Danger Index 42 Rate of spread 0.81 km/h
Vegetation classification Woodland Flame length 8.62 m
Surface fuel load 15 t/ha Flame angle 54 °, 65 °, 74 ° & 79 °
Overall fuel load 28 t/ha Elevation of receiver 3.24 m, 3.57 m, 3.65 m &
3.51 m
Vegetation height n/a Fire intensity 11,718 kW/m
Effective slope 1° Transmissivity 0.863, 0.849, 0.827 & 0.803
Site slope 2° Viewfactor 0.6056, 0.447, 0.3007 &
0.2043
Flame width 100 m Minimum distance to < 40 kW/m² 7m
Windspeed 35 km/h Minimum distance to < 29 kW/m² 9.5 m
Heat of combustion 18,600 kJ/kg Minimum distance to < 19 kW/m² 14.1 m
Flame temperature 1,090 K Minimum distance to < 12.5 kW/m² 20.5 m
1. Rate of Spread - Mcarthur, 1973 & Noble et al., 1980
2. Flame length - NSW Rural Fire Service, 2001 & Noble et al., 1980
3. Elevation of receiver - Douglas & Tan, 2005
4. Flame angle - Douglas & Tan, 2005
5. Radiant heat flux - Drysdale, 1999, Sullivan et al., 2003, Douglas & Tan, 2005
Conclusion
Based on the above findings and discussions it is our opinion that: -
1. The bushfire hazard mapping of the Tewantin National Park can effectively be mapped as an area of
medium bushfire hazard based on the particular vegetation assemblage within the area adjacent to the
subject site.
2. A 100-metre-wide Potential impact buffer still extends over more than half of the subject site.
3. Although the waterway corridor and the retained vegetation on the site are considered an area of Low
bushfire hazard in accordance with the Patch and Corridor mapping methodology as per section 2.2.1,
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original