Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

2401-38777 SRA - Response with conditions

Attached to the e-mail MCU23/0162 & OPW23/0198 SRA application correspondence.

of 6

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                                               2401-38777 SRA




Attachment 3—Reasons for referral agency response
(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)

The reasons for SARA’s decision are:
The proposed development has been assessed against and complies with the FastTrack5 qualifying
criteria checklist 4: Tidal works – Impacts on maritime safety of the SDAP, with conditions. In particular:
    The proposed development is for private single vessel pontoon located in a canal.
    The proposed private single vessel pontoon will not interfere or impact on the navigation corridor.


Material used in the assessment of the application:
    The development application material and submitted plans
    Planning Act 2016
    Planning Regulation 2017
    SDAP, version 3.0, as published by SARA
    Development Assessment Rules
    SARA DA Mapping system
    Section 58 of the Human Rights Act 2019
    South East Queensland Regional Plan 2017 (Shaping SEQ).



Attachment 4—Representations about a referral agency response
provisions
(page left intentionally blank)




State Assessment and Referral Agency                                                              Page 5 of 6
Log in to download the original file

2401-38777 SRA - Response with conditions.pdf · 253 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.