Council archive · source document
Pearl and Elm St - Planning Report · MCU21/0117.01
KG STRATEGIC STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS, CREATIVE THINKING Town Planning Report Request for a Minor Change to the Conditions specified within the Decision Notice 5 Pearl Street & 54 Elm Street, Cooroy 4563 QLD Lot 2 on RP64750 & Lot 2 RP153798 Cooroy Villas PTY LTD (ACN: 86 668 393 182) rgstrategic.com.au
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 17 pages
Page 2
Table of Contents Important Note 1. 2. Summary Background Development Intent — Proposed Change Proposed Change to Conditions 4.1. Opening paragraph and Item 2 of the Decision Notice 4.2 Proposed change to the opening paragraph and Item 2. 4.3 Proposed Change to Condition 2 4.4 Proposed change to condition 5 4.5 Proposed change to condition 29 4.6 Proposed change to condition 34 and 35 4.7 Proposed to delete conditions Operational Works approval OPW21/0199 4.8 Proposed change to condition 48 4.9 Proposed to delete condition 50 4.10 Proposed change to condition 97 Planning Assessment 5.1 Development Codes 5.2. Minor Change Conclusions List of Figures Figure 1- Roof blanket List of Tables Table 1: Substantially Different Development Guideline RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application N OAD 10 10 10 1 1 1 12 12 4 4 4 16
Page 3
Important Note
Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted
under the Copyright Act, no part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced
by any process without the written consent of RG Strategic. All enquiries should be directed to RG
Strategic.
We have prepared this report for the sole purposes of Cooroy Villas Pty Ltd ("Client") for the specific
purpose of demonstrating the proposed use as being permitted under the Noosa Plan 2020
("Purpose"). This report is strictly limited to the purpose and the facts and matters stated in it and
does not apply directly or indirectly and will not be used for any other application, purpose, use or
matter.
In preparing this report we have made certain assumptions. We have assumed that all information
and documents provided to us by the Client or as a result of a specific request or enquiry were
complete, accurate and up to date. Where we have obtained information from a government
register or database, we have assumed that the information is accurate. Where an assumption has
been made, we have not made any independent investigations with respect to the matters the
subject of that assumption. We are not aware of any reason why any of the assumptions are
incorrect.
This report is presented without the assumption of a duty of care to any other person (other than
the Client) ("Third Party"). The report may not contain sufficient information for the purposes of a
Third Party or for other uses. Without the prior written consent of RG Strategic;
e this report may not be relied on by a Third Party; and
e RG Strategic will not be liable to a Third Party for any loss, damage, liability, or claim
arising out of or incidental to a Third Party; and
e publishing, using, or relying on the facts, content, opinions, or subject matter
contained in this report
If a Third Party uses or relies on the facts, content, opinions or subject matter contained in this report
with or without the consent of RG Strategic, RG Strategic disclaims all risk and the Third Party
assumes alll risk and releases and indemnifies and agrees to keep indemnified RG Strategic from any
loss, damage, claim or liability arising directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on this report.
In this note, a reference to loss and damage includes past and prospective economic loss, loss of
profits, damage to property, injury to any person (including death) costs and expenses incurred in
taking measures to prevent, mitigate or rectify any harm, loss of opportunity, legal costs,
compensation, interest and any other direct, indirect, consequential or financial or other loss.
RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application 2
Page 4
1. Summary RG Strategic has prepared this development application on behalf of Cooroy Villas Pty Ltd. The purpose of this report is to seek approval for a Minor Change Application to Decision Notice of combined MCU21/0117 & OPW21/0199. The subject sites are 5 Pearl St Cooroy & 54 Elm St Cooroy and is formally described as Lot 2 RP 64750 and Lot 2 RP 153798. The site has recently been purchased by Cooroy Villas Pty Ltd who seek to make minor design changes to the development. The change includes 1 additional dwelling going from 11 dwellings to 12 dwellings, realigning the internal access road for a more efficient internal flow which results in 3 pods rather than 4 pods. The design continues to deliver a modern expression of the Cooroy old world vernacular and importantly, small dwellings will be delivered to help soften the housing crisis currently faced in Cooroy. The proposed Minor Change to the Multiple dwellings consists of: 10 x 2 bedroom small dwellings with a GFA of 92.35m? each; 2 x 3 bedroom dwellings with a GFA of 106.45m? each; More efficient internal vehicle flow; A new stormwater design incorporating water harvesting and reuse. This report should be read in conjunction with the accompanying covering letter, DA Form and Appendices. The development is appropriate and is not anticipated to impact upon the amenity of the locality. Council's approval of the application is therefore sought, subject to relevant and reasonable conditions. RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application 3
Page 5
2. Background On 8 November 2021 Council approved a combined application MCU21/0177 and OPW21/0199 for multiple dwellings and associated operational works. On 19 January 2021 (error should read 2022) issued a Negotiated Decision Notice. Council agreed to amend conditions 2 and 29, agreed to delete conditions 98, 102 and 104 and disagreed to amend condition 35. On 10 November 2023 a request to extend the currency period of the operational works component OPW21/0199 was submitted to Council. The applicant is currently awaiting Council's decision. RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application 4
Page 6
3. Development Intent — Proposed Change The applicant is proposing a Minor Change to Decision Notice of combined approval MCU21/0117 & OPW21/0199. The subject sites are 5 Pearl St Cooroy & 54 Elm St Cooroy and is formally described as Lot 2 RP 64750 and Lot 2 RP 153798. The change includes 1 additional dwelling in total going from 1! dwellings to 12 dwellings, realigning the internal access road for a more efficient internal flow which results in 3 pods rather than 4 pods. The design continues to deliver a modern expression of the Cooroy old world vernacular and importantly, small dwellings will be delivered to help with the housing crisis currently faced in Cooroy. The proposed Minor Change to the Multiple dwellings consists of: 10 x 2 bedroom small dwellings with a GFA of 92.35m? each; 2 x 3 bedroom dwellings with a GFA of 106.45m? each; More efficient internal vehicle flow; e Anew stormwater design incorporating water harvesting and reuse. The proposed changes are reflected in the Proposed Plans prepared by Blackburne Jackson and are enclosed within e Appendix A Architectural Plans e Appendix BSWMP e Appendix C Traffic Report / Swept Paths e Appendix D Engineering Assessment e Appendix E Landscaping e Appendix F Acoustic RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application 5
Page 7
4. Proposed Change to Conditions The following changes and deletions to the Item and Conditions contained within the Existing Approval is proposed to allow the new development to proceed. An assessment of each request change is provided within the condition item. The Item and Conditions that are affected by the proposed redesign are — e the opening paragraph and Item 2 of the Decision Notice; Material change of use MCU21/0T117 ¢ Change Conditions 2, 5, 29, 32, 34, 35. e Delete conditions 43, 44, 45, 46 and 47 as they appear superfluous as they mimic conditions 34, 35, 36, 37 and 38. Operational works OPW21/0199 e Conditions 48 and 97, ¢ Delete condition 50 4.1 Opening paragraph and Item 2 of the Decision Notice Opening paragraph | refer to your application and the representations you made in respect to the decision notice. On 19 January 2021, Council decided your representations. This negotiated decision notice replaces the decision notice of 8 November 2021. Item 2 Decision Details Council on 8 November 2021, decided to issue the following type of approval: ¢ Development Permit for Material Change of Use of Premises (Multiple Dwelling - 11 units) In relation to representations, Council on 19 January 2021 decided to: 4.2Proposed change to the opening paragraph and Item 2. The date is incorrect because the original Decision Notice was decided on 8 November 2021, so it is impossible that the Negotiated Decision was decided prior to that date on 19 January 2021. Assessment - the date should read 19 January 2022. RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application 6
Page 8
4.3Proposed Change to Condition 2 Change Condition 2 to read: 1. Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions. Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date DAO1 O04 (Cover Page, prepared by Blackburne Jackson19-12-23 DAO2 O04 Location Plan & Notes, prepared by19-12-23 Blackburne Jackson DAO3 O04 Site Plan — Level 1& 2, prepared by Blackburne19-12-23 Jackson DAO4 O04 Floor Plan — Level 1, prepared by Blackburnel9-12-23 Jackson DAOS O04 Floor Plan — Level 2, prepared by Blackburnel9-12-23 Jackson DAO6 O04 Roof Plan, prepared by Blackburne Jackson 19-12-23 DAO7 O04 Elevations, prepared by Blackburne Jackson 19-12-23 DAO8 O04 Elevations, prepared by Blackburne Jackson 19-12-23 DAO9 O04 Sections, prepared by Blackburne Jackson —-19-12-23 DAI4 O04 Perspectives, prepared by Blackburnel9-12-23 Jackson DAI5 O04 Perspectives, prepared by Blackburnel9-12-23 Jackson LO1-01_D D Landscape Notes & Schedules, prepared by19-12-23 Blackburne Jackson LO3-01_D D Landscape Planting Plan, prepared by19-12-23 Blackburne Jackson LO3-02_D D Landscape Planting Plan, prepared by19-12-23 Blackburne Jackson RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application 7
Page 9
LO7-01_D D Jackson Landscape Details, prepared by Blackburne19-12-23 The change to condition 2 is sought as the built form, layout and number of dwellings is changing, and the plans reflect those changes. As set out in the Table below, the development fully complies with all the key parameters except for a minor building height encroachment and a reduction in open space for unit 7, which is assessed thereafter. Noting that the setback to Pearl Street is 5.5 metres, less than the 6 metres required by the code, however, the setback is the same as that approved and consists of a small portion of balcony roof. Criteria Planning Scheme Approved Approved Proposed development | Complies development Development Change application Complies Building height 2 storeys max 2 storeys v 2 storeys v * storeys 8 metres 7.9 metres v 8.2m PO e metres Site cover 45% max (1,023m’) 45% (1,023m*) v 44.78 (1017.8?) v Gross floor area 1,137? max 114m? v 0.5:1 (1136.4?) v Plot ratio 0.5:1 max. Boundary setbacks ¢ Frontage (Pearl) 6 metres min 5.5 metres Comply with PO | 5.5m v v ¢ Side (north) 1.5/2.0/2.5 metres 2 metres 2 metres v v ¢ Side (south) 1.5/2.0/2.5 metres 7 metres v 7 metres v ¢ Side (east) 1.5/2.0/2.5 metres min | 2 metres v 2 metres v © Side (west) 1.5/2.0/2.5 metres min 2 metres v 6 metres Vv ¢ Frontage (Elm) 6 metres min 6 metres Vv 6 metres v Length of wall 15 metres max 15 metres v <15 metres v Roof Form , Min 5 degrees 15 degrees v 20 degrees v * Pitch Min 600mm to 75% 600mm to >75% | ¥ 600mm to >75% v e Eaves Landscaped open 796m? min (35%) 803rr? v 814.5m? (35.8%) v space 60% of total >60% v / 515m? (63.5%) v Soft landscaping 6m to frontage except Om to Pearl Comply with PO | >2 metres v Landscaping for parking and open Setbacks space — 2m min Private Open Space | 20m? min @ ground >20m? v >20m? v 9m? min @ above ground NA - Except for unit 7 which PO has 17m? Carparking 13 covered min 13 covered v 14 covered v 3 visitor 3 visitor v 4 uncovered v As demonstrated in the Table above, the proposal fully complies with all key parameters except for building height and open space for unit 7. RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application
Page 10
Building height The proposal seeks 0.2m encroachment to the ridge of the north east portion of building 2. Figure 1 below shows minor nature of the encroachment. MINOR ENCROACHMENT INTO HEIGH LIMIT PLANE OVER BUILDING 02 8.0m HEIGHT The proposal complies with PO8 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code for the following reasons- e The development is low rise and consistent in height with neighbouring structures being 2 storeys. The 0.2m will not be noticeable from the adjoining property or surrounding properties being such a minor encroachment. e Does not impact the streetscape being located to the rear of the development. e Does not obscure or impede views nor overshadow neighbouring properties as the encroachment is a small portion of the ridge. e Does not exceed 2 storeys Open space Unit 7 open space is deficient of the Acceptable Outcome requirement by 3m’. Performance outcome POT1 is applicable and is provided below. PoTl Private open space: (a) _ is provided to all dwellings and is adequate in size, shape and dimensions to suit the needs of the occupants; (b) receives adequate sunlight; and (c) is designed and orientated to ensure privacy is maintained between uses. The proposal complies with POT for the following reasons- e the size of the terrace exceeds the minimum requirement width of 2.5m and is sufficient for outdoor table and chairs; e while a little smaller than that required by AOT1.2, the terrace overlooks natural green space RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application 9
Page 11
of the bioretention basin. e The open space faces north to capture winter sun and shade for the summer. This is the ideal siting for open space. e Privacy is provided between the proposed open space and adjoining units by a screen wall and garden. No change to any condition is required for the open space change other than the approved plans. 4.4 Proposed change to condition 5 As assessed above, the minor encroachment to building height requires condition 5 to be amended to read as follows. Building Height 5. The maximum height of the development must not exceed 8-0 8.2 metres above the finished ground level and the natural ground level. 4.5 Proposed change to condition 29 Landscaping A slight change to the driveway layout requires an amendment to condition 29 to read as follows. 29. A dense 2m minimum landscaped setback to the full length of the site’s frontage to Pearl Street (excluding access, fence and bin enclosure). a. A dense 2m minimum landscaped setback to the full length of the site’s frontage to Elm Street. b. A dense Im minimum landscaped setback to all side boundaries (excluding stormwater infrastructure bir-ernetesure-aree-for-US—UF). c. The provision of 3 new street trees in accordance with PSP 2 — Landscaping. d. All landscape works must be established and maintained in accordance with the approved design for the life of the development, and in a manner that ensures healthy, sustained and vigorous plant growth. All plant material must be allowed to grow to full form and be refurbished when its life expectancy is reached. 4.6 Proposed change to condition 34 and 35 Stormwater Drainage 34. The site must be provided with a stormwater drainage system connecting to a lawful point of discharge and be in accordance with the Queensland Urban Drainage Manual (QUDM). The works must include in particular: a. The works generally as shown on the Approved Plan Ne-240+-G304ssue-D 23098 / SKIO Revision E as prepared by Reeer-Gensutting Morgan Consulting Engineers dated 18.01.24, RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application 10
Page 12
c. extension-ef the site stormwater system is to accommodate stormwater from Lot 1RP153798 external to the site, including registration of drainage easements over the site drainage system in favour of Lot 1RP153798 e. the use of gravity stormwater drainage and not surcharge pits 35. Astormwater quality treatment system must be provided for the development. The works must be undertaken in accordance with the Bioretention Technical Design Guidelines (Water by Design, 2012), and must include in particular stormwater quality treatment devices of a size and location generally in accordance with those shown inseetion 4.2 of the Stermwater Engineering Repert prepared by RECOR dated 0341/2021 the Concept Drainage Plan 23098 / SK10 Revision E prepared by Morgan Consulting Engineers dated 18.01.24 4.7 Proposed to delete conditions Delete conditions 43, 44, 45, 46 and 47 as they appear superfluous as they mimic conditions 34, 35, 36, 37 and 38. Operational Works approval OPW21/0199 Change the following conditions to reflect the amendments to the develooment. 4.8 Proposed change to condition 48 APPROVED PLANS 48. Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions. Plan No. 2101-COt 210H-CO2 210H-G20 210H-C36 210H-C40 23098/SKO1 RG Strategic Rev. B B B D B A A cS B Plan/Document Name Date CeverSheet andLoeality Plar-asprepared O3-November by ReeerGensulting 2024 Bdstine F p 63 Reeer-Consutting 2024 Site Earthworks Plan-as prepared byReeer O3-November Consulting 2024 Readworks and Drainage Layout Plan-es O3-November prepearectey Recor Consutting 2024 Reacwerks-and Drainage Deteils-as O3Nevermber preparectby RecerCensutting 2021 S Drei Sections 10h? O3 preparectby RecerCensutting 2021 S Drei Sect Dof2as 03 preparectby Recer-Censutting 2021 Turning f : R 03 ‘Consulting 2024 Concept Bulk Earthworks Plan as prepared by18.01.24 Morgan Consulting Engineers Planning Report — Minor Change Application 1
Page 13
23098/SKO2 B Concept Bulk Earthworks Plan Sectionsas 18.01.24 prepared by Morgan Consulting Engineers 23098/SK20 D Concept Services Plan as prepared by ‘Aug. 23 Morgan Consulting Engineers 23BRTO591-01 B Swept Path Analysis, prepared by TTM 20/12/23 Consulting 23098 -SBSMP/2 2 Site Based Stormwater Management Plan at 17 Jan 2024 5 Pearl Street Cooroy as prepared by Morgan Consulting Engineers 4.9 Proposed to delete condition 50 It is proposed to delete condition 50 as the stormwater management plan has been amended to incorporate a new management regime and the condition is no longer required. The roof runoff is discharged onto the ground where it sheet flows to the northeast corner of the site maintaining pre- development flow conditions and is a lawful point of discharge. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 4.10 Proposed change to condition 97 Proposed to change condition 97 to reflect the MCU condition. Landscaping A slight change to the driveway layout requires an amendment to condition 29 to read as follows. 29. A dense 2m minimum landscaped setback to the full length of the site's frontage to Pearl Street (excluding access, fence and bin enclosure). a. A dense 2m minimum landscaped setback to the full length of the site’s frontage to Elm Street. b. A dense Im minimum landscaped setback to all side boundaries (excluding stormwater infrastructure bir-enclesure-area-for U5-UF). c. The provision of 3 new street trees in accordance with PSP 2 — Landscaping. RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application 12
Page 14
d. All landscape works must be established and maintained in accordance with the approved design for the life of the development, and in a manner that ensures healthy, sustained and vigorous plant growth. All plant material must be allowed to grow to full form and be refurbished when its life expectancy is reached. RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application 13
Page 15
5. Planning Assessment The proposed Minor Change can be supported on a number of grounds as detailed below: e The proposal can be defined as a Minor Change to Approval in accordance with Schedule 1 of the Planning Act 2016, e The proposal is consistent with the outcomes sought by the Noosa Plan 2020, and e The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Decision Notice (MCU21/0117 & OPW21/0199). 5.1Development Codes The development codes applicable to the proposed Minor Change are: e Cooroy Local Plan Code, e Medium Density Residential Zone code e Dual Occupancy and Multiple Dwelling Code, and e Engineering Codes. Areview of the development codes has been undertaken with the Minor Change complying with the intent of the Performance Outcomes and Overall Outcomes of the abovementioned codes. More specifically, a comparison review of the key parameters is provided above in Section 4.3 with 2 elements, being a minor building height encroachment and a reduced open space area for unit 7 have been assessed and considered compliant with the relevant performance outcomes. 5.2Minor Change In accordance with Schedule 2 of the Planning Act 2016 a ‘minor change’ means change that - (b) for a development approval— (i) would not result in substantially different development; and (ii) if a development application for the development, including the change, were made when the change application is made would not cause— (A) the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or (B) referral to a referral agency, other than to the chief executive, if there were no referral agencies for the development application; or (C) referral to extra referral agencies, other than to the chief executive; or (D) a referral agency, in assessing the application under section 55(2), to assess the application against, or have regard to, a matter, other than a matter the referral RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application 4
Page 16
agency must have assessed the application against, or had regard to, when the application was made; or (E) public notification if public notification was not required for the development application. In respect of whether the change results in a ‘substantially different’ development, assessment against Schedule 1: Substantially Different Development Guideline contained within the Development Assessment Rules, is provided in Table 2 below: ‘Substantially different’ development Comment Involves a new use The Multiple dwelling use remains unchanged. Results in the application applying to anew parcel of land No new land is applied over as part of this change application. Dramatically changes the built form in terms of scale, bulk, and appearance As demonstrated within the architectural plans included within Appendix A the built form reflects the old world charm of the Cooroy vernacular with added modern elements. The key development parameters such as site cover and GFA, reflecting bulk and scale are similar to that approved and continue to comply with the Planning Scheme. One additional unit increases the density onsite complying with the intent of the Planning Scheme to maximise density on sites by providing small dwellings to help alleviate the current housing crisis. Changes the ability of the proposal to operate as intended The redesign does not alter the use as intended. Removes a component that is integral to the operation of the development The proposed minor change will not alter the operation of the development. Significantly impacts on traffic flow and the transport network, such as increasing traffic to the site No impacts will result because of the proposed Minor Change application. One additional unit will not significantly impact on traffic movements of the site. Introduces new impacts or increases the severity of known impacts No new impacts will occur as a result of the new layout. Removes an incentive or offset component that would have balanced a negative impact of the development No incentive or offset component will be impacted as a result of the proposed Minor Change. Impacts on infrastructure provisions The proposed Minor Change will not impact upon any infrastructure network. RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application 15
Page 17
6. Conclusions As demonstrated throughout this report, the proposed change to the approval complies with the definition of a Minor Change and is consistent with the intent of the original approval. The report demonstrates the proposed development is permitted pursuant to the provisions of the Planning Act 2016 and the Noosa Plan 2020. The proposed changes to the Multiple dwelling results in a well- designed small dwelling development which: e Helps to alleviate the housing crisis by providing small dwellings, e Maximises density on site complying with the intent of the Planning Scheme, and e Provides a built form in character with Cooroy’s old world charm. Approval of the proposed Minor Change is recommended. We look forward to Council processing the application at its earliest convenience. Should you require any additional information or have any queries please to not hesitate to contact us. RG Strategic Planning Report — Minor Change Application 16
Page 18
4 G i a aC STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS, CREATIVE THINKING rgstrategic.com.au
Used in these records
Pearl and Elm St - Planning Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.5 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.