Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

07/1571 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 142007.1571

of 50

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

a,
Project 305-2325 .
February, 2006 . Page 8

 

6.2.2 ‘ompacti ‘oc 1S ecifications

While it is noted that significant filling is not anticipated, additional filling should be carried
‘out in accordance with AS.3798-1996, and the following should be noted:

* The insitu soils, where free of organic and deleterious material, may be used for
structural fill provided the moisture content of the soils on placement approximates
the optimum moisture content required for compaction. This may require
conditioning to bring the soils to optimum.

+ Any imported fill, if needed to make up earthwork deficiencies, should have a soaked
CBR of not less than 10 percent and a maximum aggregate size of not greater than
75mm with not more than 20% greater than 20mm.

Provided the placement moisture content of the imported fill or select insitu material
approximates the optimum moisture content for compaction, suitable compaction should
be achievable using a large static smooth drum roller. Guidelines for minimum relative
compaction values for insitu soils and imported fill for the building and pavements are -
presented in Table 3.

 

 

 

Building Area 98i . 70
Notes:- i)% of the max. dry density determined by AS1289 5.1.1 (Std Compaction)

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.2.3 Excavation Characteristics

It is anticipated that excavations will consist of the following:-

* Bulk Cuts - for site stripping and excavation to construct basement levels.

Excavations on site should be within the capabilities of light plant, small dozer (Cat D4C
or similar) in bulk cuts and a medium sized backhoe (Case 580 or similar) or small
excavator (12t - 15t) in trenching, based on the investigation findings. Should substantial
excavations be required in these soils, larger plant could be budgeted to expedite
workings.

 

7 : 2. 2 SOL SURVEYS ENGINEERING .....

eA

Used in these records

About this file

File size
3.4 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

07_1571 - Response to Information Request [As Published].pdf · 3.4 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.