Council archive · source document
SUPERSEDED Negotiated Decision Notice - 010.2010.00000627.001 [As Published] · 152010.627
2010/627
<
Page 12 of 19
[OCR of page images]
2010/627
DERM Permit ‘number: PR 315387; AN 433415; SPAR 00567510
condnons stated m de pannt saqured by Me adwoe agancy respovise for he apptoabon are aa fokows
The Assessment Manager mest consaier the potental mpects of the proposed development on the ecologeal
values of the wetland, the wetland eater quabty and, the wefand water eegene Development should ensure the
folowing outcomes
+ There ts no loss of wetland habéat and adverse umpacts from development are avosied If loss to the
wetland of achverse uneects are utavodable, loss and wneects are menerrnaed and clibets are
vestigated m order to acters no net oes of the unpected wetland vals,
© = The water quabty of any waters in and bnked tp the wettend & manntemed and managed to protect the
envronmertal values of the wetland and the water quabty ctyectwes sted under Schedule 1 of the
Enwroomestal Protectao (Water) Poly 2009 are acteeved
+ The esasting water regine (imciluding surface and groundwater) win and inked to a wetaed «
Managed to protect easing natural hydrologeal processes welten the weteed eccapstemn Thee includes
teafegueeding nature! fucteibons on sone and locaton of the wetiend, and retuning and sllowng for
regeneration of vegetsbon
To ensure that the proposed development is able to meet the above outcomes. the Assessment Manager Is
encouraged to consider the requirement for a Bufler area between any proposed works and Pe wetland A
wetland buffer has two components
* @SUPO area adacent to Ihe wetland that mantans and supports he enwwoemental values of he
wettend,
* «8 Seperebo ares around Ihe support sees Tal protects he wethend fromm exterral threats such as
sediment and nutent dectarge from surcundieg wnduse
‘The Assessment Manager should ensure that here is a suticernt buffer Gestance betesen any proposed works
and the referable wetland in order to mamntzen the ecologecal functoning and integnty of he wefand Suter
@stances should be mauumesed in order to mamtan essing beodwversity values, habitat connectraty and to
eraremesea edge affects
The apphcant ts to provde a report prepared and certified by a biologst or equivalent that demonstrates to the
sabefacton of fe axsesament masager thal there are no adverse mmpects on the ecological values and
funchoning of he area of ngndicance
Revegetabon of the Suffer o: recommended utteeng locally nate speces that reflect the pre-cisanng regors!
coosystem, wth preference green fo endermes speces Plants should be of local provenance where possile A
Rehatetabon’ Revegetabon Management Plan should stipulate a weed managemert strategy moluding weed
cortrel and plant masntenance over a mmwmum one year penod Conditioning of any approwal wath budding oF
development envelope(s) may also be a useful way to give formal effect to any required butler area
The Assessment Manager should consider requeing applicants to provde a Stormwater Managemert Plas to
demonatraie how stormwater, sediment and other run-off from the a¢e (axsoceted weth the constructon and
opersboral! phases of dewelopment) well be etlectrenty managed to priwect adverse empacts on wetland vals
Potertal enpacts ave to be addressed through mater sensitive urban design inching compliance wth South
East Queensiand Regroral! Pie 2009-2091 implementation Gudatne No 7 Water senstve urban cesT
desegn atyectves for whan stormwater management
Development should ensure tat
Page 2 of > Oft207 Coqatiereet of Grewereveet aad Ramenerce Mareen et
Page 12 of 19
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
SUPERSEDED Negotiated Decision Notice - 010.2010.00000627.001 [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.3 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.