Council archive · source document
Concerns raised regarding Wimmers Factory and the drainage on properties MCU13/0171
.
.
As I have outlined before, the road and the extensive modifications to the soil profile on the
Wimmers property need to be addressed. I would ask that you liaise with the developer to address
the following issues. (I am sure that Tyrone will understand these issues better than you so I will
forward a copy of this letter to him and one to Peter Wellington as welL)
-Removal of the bridge that joins the back of the development to the old storage yard at
gate 4. This slows flood waters at present.
-Widening of the drains that have been made to contain the watercourse (creek).
-The reduction in the height ofthe soil in the areas accessed through gates 3 and 4.
-Extensive widening of the creek/drain in the area past the connecting bridge. Natural creek
flow has clearly been garrotted here by extensive land filling in the carpark area and storage yard at
the back of the building.
-Better drainage under the road is critically needed. I am keen to show anyone where I think
that this needs to be put in place. The current poor drainage under the road is a main contributor to
the frequent flooding of my property and is the reason why my property has in effect become a
flood mitigation dam for the property over the road. This must be addressed.
Overtopping of the road poses a serious threat to the public at large. If the steps that I have
outlined are undertaken then perhaps the threats will be lessened. These steps would also work in
the developer’s favour as well. The February 2012 floods came to the very corner of the building,
literally. Steps taken to unhinder and to speed water flow past the development can only serve to
safeguard the Wimmers factory as well and are also then in the developer’s best interests..
I would also suggest that guard rails need to be erected around the drains on the Wimmers
factory side of the road. The fact that a woma was left clinging to one ofthe road posts at the edge
of one of these drains in a flood event is evidence enough of the need for these posts and that
people are taking risks in travelling through this area when it is flooded.
Of further note is the fact that Tyrone showed me some projected depths of flooding for the
Wimmers site for the February 2012 flood. It was interesting to note that the land that was above
flood level was for the most part of man made profile. This gives further evidence of the way that
flood flow has been so affected. I would ask for confirmation that land that was submerged in this
flood not be built up in any way as it would clearly have further damming effects on my property.
With regards to the Wimmers factory building that has been approved I have some further
questions that I would like you to answer. Some of these questions were in my submission.
The current building is for the most part (at least the entire northern side) an open building.
This means that should flooding top the 2012 levels there is theoretically room,finally, for
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Concerns raised regarding Wimmers Factory and the drainage on properties MCU13/0171Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.