Council archive · source document
06/0210 - Response to request for information darted 14/03/06 [As Published] · 132006.210
4. HECRAS MODELLING A HECRAS model has been compiled to translate the design flow rates to flood profiles along the main floodway and along the flowpath of the kerb overflow. The cross-sections alignments for the main floodway are shown in Figure 2 while those for the kerb overflow are shown in Figure 3. Both of those figures also show the surveyed topographic data that was used to define the cross-section shapes. The model was started from a 1.25 percent slope-area condition at cross-section 1, about 80 metres downstream of Cooroy Mountain Road. Cross-section 18 represented the full width of the kerb overflow at the junction of Topaz and Kauri streets (see Figure 3). The topography immediately downstream of the kerb has the effect of deflecting part of the overflow into a formalised drainage channel to the left, while the remainder of the overflow is deflected to the right and down alongside the subject property, through cross- sections 17 to 12. The amount of the overflow which is deflected to the right was identified by locating the left-hand channel marker of cross-section 18 at the dividing line for the left and right deflections. The overflow to the right was then the sum of the "channel" flow and the "right overbank" flow at that cross-section; - which equated to 0.30 cumecs or about half of the total 100 year overflow of 0.59 cumecs.: The condition of the existing floodways is typified by the photographs in Figure 4. The main floodway in the vicinity of the subject site (cross-sections 8 to 11) is covered in long grass with some scattered trees; - these cross-sections were conservatively assigned a Manning’s n of 0.10 in the HECRAS model. Downstream of cross-section 8, the main floodway is significantly overgrown, for which a Manning’s n value of 0.15 was assigned to cross-sections 1 to 7. The course taken by the kerb overflow is basically mown grass, for which a Manning’s n value of 0.05 was assigned to cross-sections 12 to 18. Printouts of the HECRAS results for the existing floodways are shown on pages 11 and 12 of the Appendix. The predicted flood flows and levels alongside the subject property are summarised in Table 1. The flood levels are also marked on Figure 5. Table 1: Predicted 100 Year Flood Flows And Levels Cross-Section Flow (m3/s) Level (m AHD) 17 0.3 107.45 16 0.3 107.09 15 0.3 106.76 14 0.3 106.36 13 0.3 106.01 12 0.3 105.72 11 7.6 105.33 10 7.6 105.32 Brisbane Stormwater Management P/L Doc File Topaz.Rpt - 30 Oct 2006 Page 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
06/0210 - Response to request for information darted 14/03/06 [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 4.8 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.