Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Original source · versioned page text

NPM Submission - P Olsson - LATE - Proforma - MCU21/0110

of 1
Subject: OBJECTION TO HOTEL PROPOSAL AT NOOSA SPRINGS
From: Earle & Penny Bailey
Date: 2022-01-09T21:27:41+00:00
To: Mailbox Council Mail

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important<http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
External sender. Do not open links or attachments if the email is unexpected or unusual or impersonates staff.



Begin forwarded message:

From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Email from Epson WF-3720 Series
Date: 11 January 2024 at 3:12:14 am AEST
To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Attached Scan Data

[Attachment: 20240110_171212.PDF]
Objection to the Proposed Hotel at Noosa Springs

It has not gone unnoticed that this DA has been opened for comment for a short period of time just before
Christmas when most people are otherwise occupied or away.

No analysis has been provided in the Adamson Town Planning Report of the impact upon existing users of
Noosa Springs Resort, including members and residents. This impact is significant. The “material change of
use” will adversely affect every person in Noosa Springs, The Oasis, Parkridge, Elysium and The Fairways (795
properties), resort staff and members.

The development fails so many tests:

It isn’t “boutique”, in fact it will have roughly the same number of rooms as the French Quarter in
Hastings Street

At 12m high it will visually overpower existing buildings

Two thirds of the development is to be built on land zoned “recreational and open space”
It breaches height and setback restrictions

Zoning maps indicate it is a “Core Koala Habitat”, “a Koala Priority Habitat” and this will be lost
together with other fauna and flora

e With potentially 224 occupants, plus children and additional staff, the already existing fire evacuation

WS risk will be significantly increased with potentially disastrous ramifications. Numerous discussions

with Council in the past has done little to alleviate this very serious issue e.g. The Oasis BC Review of
Emergency Evacuation Provisions

The DA suggests that the guests and staff will be arriving and leaving on 2 wheels or public transport.
This is just not realistic

An already busy carpark will be inadequate for guests, staff, golfers and those who use the spa, gym,
medical facilities, restaurant etc. It is already over capacity at peak times and the Parking Studies
lack meaningful analysis

There will be increased noise and activity in an area where many elderly people reside and will affect
the quiet enjoyment and wellbeing of residents and potentially their security and safety

The club house, golf course, gym, restaurant, spa and pool will not be as available to residents and
members with Tee Times likely to be at a premium as hotel guests will likely be given priority

The developers are potentially “double-dipping” as the land originally earmarked for a hotel was used
to build Parkridge.

Many of the above serve to undermine the integrity of the Noosa Plan 2020.

| object to the Application for the proposed hotel on the above grounds.

Name Date

Address

Log in to download the original (NPM Submission - P Olsson - LATE - Proforma - MCU21_0110.msg)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.