Planner's Report

     b) The proposed changes do not result in the application applying to a new parcel of land.

     6. Comment: The proposed minor change applies to the same parcel of land as the current development
        approval.

     c) The proposed changes do not dramatically change the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance.

     7. Comment: The changes to the proposed reconfiguration plan are minor and do not involve a dramatic
        change to built form. The proposed changes result in a reduced development footprint due to the
        dedication of an additional 6.7 hectares of parkland.

     d) The proposed changes do not change the ability of the proposal to operate as intended.

     8. Comment: The proposed changes will not affect the ability of the proposal to operate as intended i.e. as a
        rural residential subdivision.

     e) The proposed changes do not remove a component that is integral to the operation of the development.

     9. Comment: The proposed changes do not seek to remove any components that are integral to the
        operation of the development.

     f)   The proposed changes do not significantly impact on traffic flow and the transport network, such as
          increasing traffic to the site.

     10. Comment: As demonstrated in the response to point a) above, the proposed changes involve a reduction in
         the number of lots and will not result in increased impacts on traffic flow or the existing road network.

     g) The proposed changes do not introduce new impacts or increase the severity of known impacts.

     11. Comment: The proposed changes do not introduce any new impacts or increase any known impacts in
         relation to environmental values, bushfire hazard or landslide risk nor visual impacts beyond that which
         was already anticipated and addressed under the existing development approval. Refer to the assessment
         reports prepared in relation to ecology (Appendix C), bushfire hazard (Appendix D) and agricultural land
         (Appendix B) for details.

     h) The proposed changes do not remove an incentive or offset component that would have balanced a negative
        impact of the development.

     12. Comment: The proposed changes do not remove any incentive or offset component that was considered
         under the existing development approval. The proposed changes provide additional ecological and
         community benefits through the dedication of an additional 6.687 hectares as parkland resulting in a total
         dedication of over 59 hectares.




JFP Ref: M1775                                                                                                Page 16