Original source · versioned page text
Objection to Noosa Civic development application - MCU23_0078 CCPL 121223
Attached to the e-mail PM Submission - John Kirby - MCU23/0078.
Tuesday, 12 December 2023 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL PO BOX 141 TEWANTIN QLD 4565 ATTENTION: Nadine Gorton VIA EMAIL: [email protected] Dear Nadine, OBJECTION TO DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - MCU23/0078 Application No: MCU23/0078 Proposal: Development Permit for Material Change of Use - Indoor Sport and Recreation, Multiple Dwelling, Short Term Accommodation, Office, Theatre, Shop, Food and Drink Outlet & Shopping centre (Extension to Existing) Street Address: 69 Hofmann Dr, 46 Walter Hay Dr & 28 Eenie Creek Rd Noosaville Qld 4566 Real Property Description: Lot 1 SP322201, Lot 3 SP322201, Lot 7 SP322201 Carolyna Chase Pty Ltd (CCPL) is the registered owner of the premises located at 29 Sunshine Beach Road, Noosa Heads (Noosa 5 Cinemas). Sunshine Cinemas Pty Ltd (SSC) is the lessee of CCPL and operates Noosa 5 Cinemas which forms part of the wider Noosa Junction major activity centre. CCPL wishes to object to the above referenced development application which will significantly impact on the viability of the existing and future businesses in the Noosa Junction major activity centre, with resultant flow on effects to the community. Grounds for objection to development application - MCU23/0078 The maintenance of centre hierarchy policies provides investors and businesses with the confidence and security needed to justify continued investment in activity centres. These policies provide a public acknowledgement of Council’s continued commitment to existing investments in centres. During the history
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 4 pages
Page 2
of CCPL’s investment in Noosa Junction, we have relied upon Council's consistent application of the centre hierarchy. Noosa 5 Cinemas forms part of the wider Noosa Junction major activity centre. Many businesses within the Noosa Junction activity centre, including Noosa 5 Cinemas, are operating in a very challenging environment. Leasing opportunities remain available within the Noosa Junction activity centre which is an indicator of demand. The development application for the Noosa Civic expansion is substantial, with over 17,000m2 of retail, commercial and entertainment floor space being proposed. The proposal includes 7,500m2 of shops, food and drink outlets, offices and health care services, 1,100m2 of bar and dining, 2,700m2 of indoor sport and recreation, 3,070m2 of theatre (6 screen cinema), 3,000m2 of business uses, 445m2 of research and technology and permanent and short-term accommodation. The Noosa Civic expansion is far larger than contemplated by the planning scheme’s activity centre hierarchy. The expansion is proposed to be located on land that is within 7 kilometres of the Noosa Junction major activity centre. This is a 9-minute drive. Both Noosa Civic and Noosa Junction are major activity centres intended by the planning scheme to have distinct and complementary roles. While we acknowledge that Noosa Civic is identified in the Noosa Plan 2020 as the predominate centre, the size of the expansion is simply far too large to “complement” the Noosa Junction activity centre. The proposed expansion of Noosa Civic will also represent a duplication of existing functions already provided and will have serious adverse trade and employment impacts on existing businesses in the Noosa Junction activity centre. This in turn will have a material adverse impact on the long term viability of the Noosa Junction activity centre. The Noosa Plan 2020 is a recent planning instrument. It is not a document that is out of date or overtaken by events. The Noosa Plan 2020’s Strategic Framework provides the following intent statement for Noosa Junction: Noosa Junction is a vibrant mixed-use centre. It caters for creative industries, retail via local brands, food and entertainment venues, knowledge based industries, professional services and education. Development provisions have been significantly increased, compared to previous planning schemes, to allow for greater redevelopment options. Entertainment and lifestyle pursuits enhance the centre’s role as a vibrant place for hospitality in conjunction with retail and services. The planning scheme’s outcomes for the Major Centre Zone also state that…Uses within a Major Centre do not detract from the role or function of another Major Centre. Allowing such a large expansion of Noosa Civic will detract from the existing and envisaged role and function of the Noosa Junction activity centre. The proposed development cannot achieve the planning scheme’s outcomes for the Major Centre Zone and will result in Noosa Junction activity centre not being able to achieve the intent described in the Strategic Framework. Council must ensure that Noosa Junction remains a vibrant and viable activity centre as described in the Strategic Framework. This must be a relevant consideration in the assessment of the application. The proposed cinema is 20m high. The planning scheme sets clear expectations for building heights of 10- 12m on the Noosa Civic site. The proposed cinema therefore represents a +60% increase in building height above that envisaged for the site. There is no justification in the applicant’s material for such a substantial
Page 3
exceedance of the preferred building height for the site. This is also a major conflict with the planning
scheme and directly relates to the significant scale of the proposed cinemas.
CCPL has reviewed the submitted economic assessment, particuarly section 6.2. The following concerns are
noted with the assessment:
• The economic assessment significantly overestimates historical and current cinema occupancy
rates for the existing Noosa 5 Cinemas. The table below includes 10 years of occupancy rates for
the Noosa 5 Cinemas and demonstrates that the existing cinemas have significant spare capacity;
• The economic assessment overstates future cinema attendances. Screen Australia data identifies
that the pre-pandemic average cinema visitation was 3.55 visits per year over the six (6) years to
2019 1. This reduced to 3.3 visits per year in 2019 and then plummeted to 1.1-2.2 visits per year in
2020-2022. According to the Motion Picture Distributors Association of Australia (MPDAA),
visitations were still only 2.2 visits per year in the 2022 calander year, or 32% below pre-Covid
years. The cinema industry expects visitations for the 2023 calendar year to remain 30%
below 2019 levels. These figures indicate that there will be a slow recovery due to many factors
including film industry disruptions, delays in movie production and the increasing impact of online
streaming services.
• The economic assessment applies a 25% tourism “loading” in addition to inflated assumed local
average visitation levels. The 25% tourism loading is not a reasonable assumption and is far too
high to be representative of the Noosa market. Any loading applied should be in the range of 2-
13% for the Noosa region based on comparable markets with high inbound tourism rates.
• The economic assessment utilises the retail catchment trade area to define the trade area for the
proposed cinemas. This catchment area is extremely large, extending approximately 30-40
kilometres from the site, well beyond Cooroy, Pomona and Cooran. CCPL consider this defined
1
https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/fact-finders/cinema/industry-trends/historical-admissions
Page 4
catchment to be far too large and not representative of the actual Noosa cinema market. The
artificially large catchment area is exaggerating population numbers, visitation rates and demand.
• The economic assessment applies a typical threshold rate of 40,000 attendances per year per
cinema screen. SSC has a thorough understanding of the cinema market and considers an
indicative threshold rate of closer to 50,000 attendances per year as realistic, which is 24% larger
than the threshold rate used by the applicant’s consultant. Applying 40,000 attendances per year
to a new cinema screen is not viable.
• The economic assessment includes the following statement with respect to cinema need:
It is emphasised that the proposed use is entirely consistent with the provisions of the
planning scheme and therefore not subject to need assessment.
CCPL strongly objects to this statement. The proposed cinema use (defined as a theatre) is subject
to impact assessment and is not “entirely consistent” with the planning scheme. Schedule 6 of the
planning scheme clearly requires a consideration of need in the assessment of this component of
the application. Need is a relavant factor. The economic assessment significantly overestimates
cinema demand and fails to estimate the impact of the proposed six (6) screen cinema which, could
contain approximately to 1,200 seats, is addition to the existing cinema capacity.
In summary, CCPL objects to the development for the following reasons:
• The proposed expansion of Noosa Civic is far too large and should be reduced in size to comply
with the planning scheme’s Strategic Framework, centres hierarchy and Major Zone Code. The size
of the retail offering and cinemas will jeopardise the centres hiearchy. The expansion must not
diminish the standing and potential growth of the Noosa Junction activity centre;
• The cinema market in the Noosa region is insufficient to support an additional major cinema
complex that doubles the amount of cinema screens and triples the amount of cinema seats in the
trade area. There is no latent unsatified demand that warrants such an expansion;
• The submitted economic assessment inflates the cinema catchment size and cinema potential
attendance. The Theatre land use is an impact assessable land use. Need and trading impacts are
relevant considerations in the assessment of this component of the application. The proposed
cinemas are not justified on the basis of public need and adverse economic impact;
• The cinemas significantly exceed the preferred maximum building height for the precinct. This is a
further indicator that the cinema proposal is too large. There is no basis for a +60% height increase
above the preferred maximum building height for this component of the application.
Given the significance of the issues raised, we request a meeting with key Council staff and Councillors.
Please contact me to organise a suitable time.
Page 5
Yours faithfully
Carolyna Chase Pty Ltd
John Kirby
Director
15 St Georges Road
Toorak VIC 3142
[email protected]>
Cc: Mayor Clare Stewart [email protected]
Deputy Mayor Cr Frank Wilkie [email protected]
Cr Karen Finzel [email protected]
Cr Joe Jurisevic [email protected]
Cr Amelia Lorentson [email protected]
Cr Brian Stockwell [email protected]
Cr Tom Wegener [email protected]