Council archive · source document
Viridian Planning Report 27 Nov 2013 [A] · 132006.823.07
EXAMPLES OF OPERATIONS WITH NO IMPOSITION OF RESTRICTIVE CONDITION
A restrictive condition is not imposed on other resorts in the Hastings Street Precinct including the
Viridian Residences which adjoins the Resort .Of 348 units surveyed by KPMG in December 2012 in
that precinct there was only one unit occupied on a permanent basis, which is currently on the market
for sale and will most probably revert to short term use.
Survey - KPMG - December 2012
Number
Resort Location Units Permanents
Little Hastings
Viridian Residences Street 23 1
Sebel Hastings Street 112 0
2 Hastings Street Hastings Street 13 0
Sandcastles Hastings Street 15 0
Sea Haven Hastings Street 66 0
Breakfree French Quarter Hastings Street 119 0
Totals 348 1
JUSTIFICATION
.
The proposed changes to Condition 23 do not:
a) Result in any change to the physical built form of the development
b) Introduce any new use
c) Result in new works
d) Change the amenity impacts on and off site
e) Result in any visual change to the development
f) Cause external impacts
g) Give rise to adverse submissions.
h) Stipulate the availability of units for permanent occupation.
The changes direct the operator / manager through the Body Corporate to actively encourage owners
to avail themselves of on-site letting services.
PERMISSIBLE CHANGE
The change to the condition meets the test of being a Permissible Change for reasons that :
• it will not result in “substantially different development”
• nor require impact assessment,
• nor involve any concurrence agency
• nor likely to cause a submission to be made objecting to the change
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
VIRIDIAN PLANNING REPORT 27 NOV 2013 [A]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 457 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.