Original source · versioned page text
Traffic Impact Statement
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT REPORT
FOR
51 ELANDA STREET (MULTI-RESIDENTIAL)
NOVEMBER 2024
FINAL REPORT
PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:
Archend ITE Consulting
34 Flamingo Crescent
Thornlands
Brisbane
4164
Contact Person: Juma Jackson
Tel:
Email: Contact Person: Herman Joubert
Tel: 0424110122
Email: [email protected]
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.
Full text of pages 2 to 29 (of 52)
Page 2
ITE CONSULTING REPORT
QUALITY ASSURANCE ISSUE DATA
Report Title: 51 Elanda Street TIS
Client: Archend
Project Team: Herman Joubert MEng CEng (U.K) CPEng (NZ) RPEQ
Project Name: 51 Elanda Street TIS
Report Number: 001
Revision Number 01
Revision History:
Date Report Status Written by Reviewed by
12/11/2024 Draft Herman Joubert Herman Joubert
25/11/2024 Final Herman Joubert Herman Joubert
25/11/2024
Approved by:
Signed Date
Herman Joubert
RPEQ No.: 25899
2
Page 3
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................ 3
LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................................. 3
LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................................... 4
LIST OF ANNEXURES ......................................................................................................................................................... 4
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND APPROACH ........................................................................................................................ 5
1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW .....................................................................................................................................................5
1.2 PROPOSED APPLICATION ...............................................................................................................................................5
1.3 SCOPE AND CONTEXT OF REPORT ....................................................................................................................................6
1.4 REFERENCE GUIDES ......................................................................................................................................................6
2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 7
2.1 ON-SITE USES .............................................................................................................................................................7
2.2 LAND USES .................................................................................................................................................................7
2.3 SITE SURROUNDING ROAD NETWORK ..............................................................................................................................7
2.4 EXISTING ACCESS .........................................................................................................................................................7
2.5 FUTURE PLANNED ROAD UPGRADES................................................................................................................................7
3.0 DEVELOPMENT DETAILS ...................................................................................................................................... 8
3.1 DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT ................................................................................................................................................8
3.2 PROPOSED VEHICLE ACCESS ...........................................................................................................................................8
3.2.1 Traffic Signal System Operational Overview ......................................................................................................9
3.2.2 Signal Control and Car Stacker Impact on vehicle Queueing ............................................................................12
4.0 TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................................................... 14
4.1 CAR PARKING ARRANGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................14
4.1.1 Car Parking Supply ............................................................................................................................................14
4.1.2 Car Parking Layout ...........................................................................................................................................15
4.1.3 Mechanical (Car Stacker) Parking ....................................................................................................................16
4.2 SERVICING REQUIREMENTS ..........................................................................................................................................17
4.2.1 Regular Servicing (Refuse) ................................................................................................................................17
4.2.2 Occasional Servicing .........................................................................................................................................18
5.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. 20
5.1 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................................20
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1.1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT EXTENTS .............................................................................................................6
TABLE 1.2 LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................6
TABLE 2.1 IMMEDIATE SITE SURROUNDING ROAD NETWORK ......................................................................................7
TABLE 3.1 DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................8
TABLE 3.2 VEHICLE QUEUEING ANALYSIS RESULTS ......................................................................................................12
TABLE 4.1 PARKING SUPPLY ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................................14
TABLE 4.2 CAR PARK LAYOUT REVIEW ..........................................................................................................................15
3
Page 4
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
TABLE 5.3 WASTE GENERATION ...................................................................................................................................17
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1.1: SITE LOCALITY .......................................................................................................................................................5
FIGURE 3.1: SIGNAL SYSTEM EXAMPLE ..................................................................................................................................11
FIGURE 4.1: GRASS BLOCK PAVER EXAMPLE ..........................................................................................................................15
FIGURE 5.1: EXISTING ON-STREET SERVICING ........................................................................................................................19
LIST OF ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A – SITE LAYOUT PLANS
ANNEXURE B – VEHICLE SWEPT PATHS
ANNEXURE C – CAR STACKER SPECIFICATIONS EXAMPLE
ANNEXURE D – BIN TUG AND TRAILER EXAMPLE
4
Page 5
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND APPROACH
1.1 Project Overview
ITE Consulting has been engaged to prepare a traffic impact statement report for a proposed multiple dwelling
development comprising of 6 units at 51 Elanda Street, Sunshine Beach. The site locality is provided in Figure
1.1.
Figure 1.1: Site Locality
Source: Noosa Plan 2020
The proposed development is located adjacent to Elanda Street which is considered to be the frontage street
providing access to the proposed development. The site is located within the High-Density Residential zone.
1.2 Proposed Application
The proposed application is for a material change of use consisting of:
5
Page 6
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
Table 1.1 Proposed Development Extents
Parameter Extent
Apartments: 6 Apartments
Bedrooms: 4 x 3-bedroom and 2 x 2-bedroom
Carparks: 12 (10 x resident and 2 x visitor)
There is no phasing expected for this development. The following legislative summary items applicable to the
proposed reconfiguration and TIS are indicated in Table 1.2.
Table 1.2 Legislative Summary
Legislative Summary
Local Government Authority Noosa Shire Council
Planning Scheme Zone/s High Density Residential
PSP9 Waste Management
Applicable Planning Scheme Assessment Codes
Driveways and Parking Code
1.3 Scope and Context of Report
This report investigates the transport aspects associated with the proposed development to inform the due
diligence aspects.
• Parking supply required to cater for development demand
• Parking layout to provide efficient and safe internal maneuvering
• Site servicing requirements
• Access configuration to provide efficient and safe maneuvering between the site and the public road
network
• Suitability of access and internal facilities to provide for pedestrian and cyclist operation
1.4 Reference Guides
The following documents have been evaluated in order to formulate the traffic advice within this assessment:
• AS/NZS 2890.1 – 2004 Parking facilities Part 1: Off-street car parking
• AS/NZS 2890.2 – 2018: Off-street commercial vehicle facilities
• Road Planning and Design Manual, Chapter 13
• Plans of the proposed development, with a copy of relevant drawings
provided in Appendix A to this report
• Noosa Shire Council Planning Scheme 2020
6
Page 7
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.1 On-Site Uses
The existing use of the site is a single residential dwelling which will be demolished as part of the proposed
development.
2.2 Land Uses
The surrounding area is largely fully developed, consisting primarily of medium to high-density residential
properties. Each of the buildings along Elanda Street have crossovers to the street, with servicing that occurs
on-street. This proposed development is considered a similar scale and intensity as the surrounding
developments and built form and as such similar on-street servicing is considered suitable.
2.3 Site Surrounding Road Network
Descriptive details regarding the road network surrounding the proposed site is provided in Table 2.1. The
table provides information regarding existing geometrical conditions of the road network and associated road
links.
Table 2.1 Immediate Site Surrounding Road Network
Road Name Number of Lanes per Carriageway Single / Lane Width Posted Speed
Road Class
Direction Dual (m) (km/h)
Elanda Street Local Street 1 S 7.8* 50
Note: * On-street parking is provided for.
Elanda Street is classified as a local street providing direct lot access with permitted on-street parking in a low-
speed environment.
2.4 Existing Access
The site currently obtains access to Elanda Street by means of un unformed access driveway across the verge.
The site does not provide for regular servicing of refuse collection as this is done on-street. The site also does
not provide SRV / MRV access for occasional servicing in the event of furniture removal. This is also done on-
street.
2.5 Future Planned Road Upgrades
Through evaluation of the Noosa plan 2020, it was found that there are no planned road upgrades which
would impact on the viability of the proposed development. The development would also not generate the
need for any enhanced upgrades to the road network or public transport services. Such services are
considered appropriate to cater for the needs of the development.
7
Page 8
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
3.0 DEVELOPMENT DETAILS
3.1 Development Layout
The proposed development consists of a 6 unit multiple-residential development with 1 basement level
providing parking to 10 resident bays and 2 visitor bays on ground level. Refuse collection is proposed to be
undertaken via kerbside collection, with the respective 240L bins stored at basement level. Waste generation
estimates are provided in Section 4.3.
3.2 Proposed Vehicle Access
It is proposed that vehicular access for the development will be provided via a 5m wide RS-049 driveway given
access will be for User Class 1 light vehicles only. The proposed crossover and driveway width is considered
sufficient to allow for safe passing of vehicles. Refer to swept paths in Appendix B. Due to the constrained
nature of the subject site (which measures approximately 11.8m between the northern and southern
boundaries), it is proposed that the basement parking area will be accessed via a two-way crossover and
driveway which tapers down to a 3.5m wide single lane access to the basement level. It is proposed that a
signal-controlled system be installed between the ground and basement levels to assist circulation for vehicles
entering and exiting the residential car parking area.
The Noosa Shire Planning Scheme 2020 reverts to the standard drawings published by the Institute of Public
Works Engineering Australia, Queensland (IPWEAQ) for crossover design. Regarding other key access
parameters, the Planning Scheme reverts to ‘AS2890.1’. Table 3.1 details the access parameters in accordance
with the requirements outlined in ‘AS2890.1’ and IPWEAQ standard drawing ‘RS-049’, where compliance is
not achieved, further information is provided below.
Table 3.1 Driveway Configuration Assessment
Noosa Plam 2020 / IPWEAQ
Design Aspect Proposed Provision ITE Comment
Requirement
5m width at kerb and 6m max 5m width at kerb and 5.4m
Crossover Width Compliant
width at property boundary width at property boundary
Minimum Intersection
6m from tangent point of kerb Over 100m Compliant
Separation
Ideally 69m, minimum 45m
Existing sight lines are >69m
Sight Distance where frontage posted speed is Compliant
along both directions of travel.
50km/h.
6m (1 car) at 3% of parking
Entry Queue Capacity 6m Compliant
capacity
Will be 1:20 (5%) in accordance
Gradient of first 6m 1:20 (5%) Compliant
with IPWEAQ RS-050
8
Page 9
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
Not to exceed 15% and in
Gradient across verge Not to exceed 15% accordance with IPWEAQ RS- Compliant
050
The driveway crossover will be designed as an IPWEAQ RS-049 and finalized during detailed design prior to
Operational Works approval. The development proposal generally complies with ‘AS2890.1’ requirements;
however, the following aspects of the car park design have been resolved with alternative solutions:
3.2.1 Traffic Signal System Operational Overview
As noted above, it is proposed that a signal-controlled system will be installed to assist circulation between
vehicles entering and exiting from the residential car parking area, the ramp and the driveway. The system will
include a traffic signal at ground level where vehicles can stop in the widened driveway to allow opposing
vehicles to exit before entering the basement. Traffic signal will be positioned to be observed from the
driveway with a hold bay at ground level where vehicles can wait upon a green phase to enter the site,
although priority will always be given to entering vehicles. The system will be controlled by red and green
traffic signals positioned in highly visible locations.
Given the manoeuvring space required to enter and exit the basement level, there is no opportunity to
introduce a hold bay at this level. Consequently, it is proposed that each resident will be provided with a
remote control which will activate the traffic lights once they intend to exit their parking space. Appropriate
signage will be installed to direct visitors to the location of the visitor parking space at ground level, it is
considered practical to alert visitors not to enter the basement level. This would negate the need for visitors
to enter the Basement and have to turn-around. In relation to the operation of the traffic signal and car
stackers, the following two scenarios describes its operation.
Scenario 1 – Car Entering
• A vehicle entering will have priority green unless an opposing vehicle is already approaching on the
ramp whereas the signal will be red and the driver will need to wait at the hold point. After the
required clearance time the signal will turn green.
• 15 seconds for the car to travel down the ramp and into the basement level.
• Parking time per vehicle – 10 seconds
Scenario 2 – Car Exiting
• The driver will activate the traffic signals in the vehicle bays by means of using a resident remote
control. Once the signal turns green the vehicle will leave the bay
• 10 seconds for car to leave parking bay and traverse to the base of the ramp
• 15 seconds to drive up along the ramp.
9
Page 10
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
• After required clearance times the signal at ground level will turn green again.
It must be noted that exact system specifications of the traffic signal system will be finalised during detail
design and Building Approval once a contractor has been appointed to design and install such a traffic signal
control system. The system will be similar to those which have been installed on numerous other residential
developments and may include the following, but not limited to, specifications as illustrated in Figure 3.1.
10
Page 11
ITE CONSULTING
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT ENGINEERS
Figure 3.1: Signal System Example
Source: Parcsafe
11
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
Page 12
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
3.2.2 Signal Control Impact on vehicle Queueing
Whilst priority will be given to entering vehicles, sufficient queuing area will need to be provided to
accommodate a vehicle at Ground Level should it be required to give way to a vehicle that has already begun
to egress the site. The proposal provides a 6m long queuing area by means of a hold bay. It should be noted
that the queuing provision requirements outlined in ‘AS2890.1’. are based on the number of carparks and
does not take into account the land use or development traffic generation/ space turnover. Additionally, it
should be noted that the queuing requirements specified in Table 3.3 of ‘AS2890.1’ primarily relate to the
requirements at short-stay car parking facilities (e.g. city centre parking, parking stations, hospital and medical
centres) and its application in this instance is not considered appropriate. The purpose of queuing provisions is
to ensure that any queuing generated by internal development traffic operations, such as vehicles stopped
waiting for the car lift, are contained within the subject site. Such that there is minimal impact on the external
road impact.
A Poisson distribution queueing analysis have been conducted to determine the impact which the proposed
signal control and car stacker operations would have on vehicle queueing at ground level and within the
basement. The proposed development would have a peak hour generation of 3.3 vehicles during both AM and
PM peak hours. This would entail:
• AM Peak: 1 inbound and 3 outbound
• PM Peak: 3 inbound and 1 outbound
• Total cycle time (ramp and furthest car bay): 40 seconds
The vehicle queueing analysis results (based on worst-case PM peak volumes) are provided in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2 Vehicle Queueing Analysis Results
Queue Length Analyses (M/M/1 Queue): Access AM and PM Peak Hour
Sourced from: 'Austroads Guide to Traffic Management Part 2: Traffic Theory'
Variable Inputs
Unit of time hour
Arrival rate 3 vehicles per hour
Service rate 90 vehicles per hour
Number of gates 1 gates
Queue distance per vehicle 6 metres
Outputs
Direct outputs from inputs
Mean time between arrivals 0.333 hour
Mean time per service 0.0 hour
Traffic intensity 0.03
12
Page 13
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
Summary measures
Average utilisation rate of gate 3.3%
Average number of vehicles waiting in line (Lq) 0.00115 vehicles
Average number of vehicles in system (L) 0.03448 vehicles
Average time waiting in line (Wq) 0.00038 hour
Average Delay E(w) 1.37931 seconds
Probability of no vehicles in system (P0) 0.96667 (this is the probability of empty system)
Probability of 'x' vehicles in queue (%) 3.2 1
Probability that at least one server is idle -222.2% (this is also the "percentage who don't wait in queue")
Number of gates required 1
Average Delay (Time in Queue (hour)) 0.011
Average Queue (vehicles) 0.0
Mean Queue (per lane) - vehicles 0.034
Formula (vehicles) 0.00
85% Rounded up (vehicles) 0
Percentile Back of Queue
Distance (metres) 0
Formula (vehicles) 0.00
(per lane)
95% Rounded up (vehicles) 0
Distance (metres) 0
Formula (vehicles) 0.35
99% Rounded up (vehicles) 1.00
Distance (metres) 6
Mean Delay (veh) seconds 41.38
Q Prob. 1 More than 1 veh. 0.1%
Queue Theory Mean Queue 0.15
p(N+1) = (1-%) nq = p/(1-p) 0.05
N+1 = logp(1-%) 0.01
N = logp(1-%)-1 Mean Waiting Time (Delay)
Wm = nq/qa
where:
p = Utilisation Ratio
% = Percentile Queue
N = No. of Vehicles
nq = Mean Queue (incl. vehicle being serviced)
qa = Approach Volume
Wm = Mean Delay (incl. vehicle being serviced)
It can be seen from Table 3.2 that the 95th percentile probability would be 1 vehicle queue in the peak hour.
This arrangement is sufficient for the low turnover trips of this development of only 6 units. Overall, ITE
Consulting consider the proposed arrangements to be safe and convenient, with majority of drivers being
familiar with such signal-controlled arrangements at other similar developments. As such, the proposed
arrangements are considered to align with PO1, PO3 and PO6 of the TAP Code.
13
Page 14
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
4.0 TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT
4.1 Car Parking Arrangements
4.1.1 Car Parking Supply
Council parking requirements for this type of development as well as the parking proposed to be provided are
identified in Table 4.1. This allows for a reduction in car parking where motorcycle parking is provided.
Table 4.1 Parking Supply Assessment
Type Units Rate Parking
3-bedroom 4 2 per 3-bedroom 8
2-bedroom 2 1 per 2-bedroom 2
Visitor 1 per 4 dwellings 2
Total 12
The development proposes to allow for vehicle 12 parking bays, of which there will be 10 x resident bays and 2
x visitor bays. This is considered sufficient to accommodate the anticipated demand and compliant with Noosa
Plan 2020.
Further information regarding the suitability of the proposed parking provision is addressed below:
PWD Parking Provision
The ‘Building Code of Australia (BCA)’ stipulates that PWD parking is to be provided at a ratio of 1 space per
100 standard spaces (not including reserved residential parking). Given that only 1 standard non-reserved
parking space is provided (visitor parking), it is not considered necessary to provide a PWD space.
Ground Level Visitor Bay Surface Treatment
To achieve the landscaping intent of the development, the visitor bay is to be constructed with grass block
paver planting cells (for occasional driving over). Given the infrequent nature of use for these visitor bays it is
considered appropriate. Furthermore it is proposed to allow for a wheel stop to be offset 620mm from the
front of the bay with landscaping height less than 150mm. This is to allow for additional landscaping in the
front overhang area of the vehicle, fully compliant with AS2890.1:2004.
14
Page 15
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
Figure 4.1: Grass Block Paver Example
Source: Besserblockcentre.com.au
Overall, the proposed parking provision is considered to adequately cater for the practical requirements of the
development.
4.1.2 Car Parking Layout
A review of the proposed car parking layout against the requirements of Australian Standard for Off Street Car
Parking (AS/NZS2890.1‐2004) is summarised in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2 Car Park Layout Review
Design Element Australian Standard Proposed Provision Comment
2.4m width x 5.4m minimum
2.4m width x 5.4m minimum
Resident Parking length (User Class 1A). Complies with Australian Standards
length (User Class 1A)
Car stackers = 2.85m x 5.5m
V1 = 3.2m width x 5.4m
minimum length (User Class
2.4m width x 5.4m minimum
Visitor parking 1A). Complies with Australian Standards
length (User Class 1A)
V2 = 2.8m x 5.4m minimum
length (User Class 1A).
3.2m width with allowance
for 850mm landscaping along
the northern boundary of the
site. Landscaping to be
Straight Ramp 3m between kerbs Complies with Australian Standards
<150mm to allow for vehicle
overhang if needed which
allows for a total width of
4.04m.
5.8m width (90-degree
Circulating Aisle parking) which includes Varies 6m – 9m Complies with Australian Standards
required clearances
Parking envelope
Space 0.3m clear Space 0.30m clear
clearance – space Complies with Australian Standards
of wall of wall
adjacent to wall
15
Page 16
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
Maximum Gradient: Max gradient of 1:16 (6.25%)
1:20 (5.0%)
Parking bay across parking bays 8, 9 and Complies with Australian Standards
1:16 (6.25%)
Parking aisle 10.
12.5% summit
15.0% sag No greater than 12.5% at
Maximum Ramp
Transitions required where summit and no greater than Complies with Australian Standards
Transitions
grade change is 12.5% and 15% at sag.
more
Cars = 2.2m min along ramp
and 4.5m in the basement.
Height clearance Cars = 2.2m Complies with Australian Standards
Car bays to have a 2.2m high
over bonnet encroachment.
1m beyond last bay and
Parking aisle extension including widening of last bay 1m beyond last bay Complies with Australian Standards
with 300mm
The proposed carpark layout complies with AS2890.1:2004 requirements. All vehicles are able to enter and
exit the parking bays within the minimum number of turns required. ITE consider that a functional layout is
provided for in the design. All circulation swept paths were carried out by means of AS2890.1:2004 B99
vehicles fully compliant with AS2890.1:2004 Clause B3 for circulation clearance. Car Bay 10 in the basement
will be reserved for resident use only and such residents will be familiar with the height limits of this car bay.
An RPEQ height clearance assessment was carried out as indicated in Appendix B, and it was found that
appropriate height clearance hazard tape be provided across the car bay to indicate the height clearance limit.
4.1.3 Mechanical (Car Stacker) Parking
It is proposed to allocate in ground mechanical parking (car stackers) to parking bays 1-6 in the basement for
residents. Each system will provide two levels of independent parking which will be allocated to the same
residential unit. These car stacker systems operate in an independent manner i.e. vehicle parked within the
lower inground parking space can be accessed / exit without the need to relocate / “shuffle” the vehicle in the
upper parking space. A basement ceiling height of 4.5m is allowed for which would provide a full expansion of
the stacker so that the lower vehicle can access the mechanical parking system. As such, this system allows for
a similar operation as a normal car bay which operates in an independent manner. The following assessment
of the mechanical parking system as specified for the proposed system being Klaus Multibase U10 is provided:
1. It is proposed to provide a lower height of 200cm and upper vehicle height opportunity of at least
2.2m where ceiling heights are 4500cm. An AS2890.1:2004 B85 has a vehicle height of 160cm and the
average adult male has a height of 1.8m in Australia. The proposed lower vehicle height of 2.0m is
considered sufficient. The height proposed is also compliant with AS2890.1:2004 Clause B6 which
states:
“The height of all passenger cars and station wagons are 1.5m. The clear height between floors must
also cater for persons walking with reasonable comfort and safety. The 99th percentile height of a male
16
Page 17
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
in Australia is 1.88m. Vans and off-road vehicles used as private passenger vehicles need to be catered
for. The majority of these are <2m”
The proposed height clearance of car stackers comply with these requirements, however it should be
noted that car stackers are designed in accordance with AS5124 and not AS2890.1:2004 or that of the
and as such height clearances of >2.1m are commonly not manufactured.
2. Single platform as per the plans will be sufficient with a width of 2.85m and clear platform width as
per Klaus specifications. Shop drawings will be refined by the manufacturer based on the layout
requirements. Refer to Appendix B for swept paths.
3. The parking bay lengths are proposed to be 5.5m long. Klaus requires 650cm wide parking aisles for
comfortability, although AS2890.1:2004 only requires 580cm. This is considered sufficient given the
turn paths provided in Appendix B where the geometrical combination of parking aisle angle and
parking bay dimensions provide for sufficient turn paths for user class 1A where up to 3-point turn for
B85 vehicles are appropriate.
ITE considers the proposed car stackers sufficient to provide for effective parking management and supply and
consider the proposed arrangements to be safe and convenient, with majority of drivers being familiar with
such arrangements at other similar developments. Specification of the system is provided in Annexure C.
4.2 Servicing Requirements
4.2.1 Regular Servicing (Refuse)
It is the intention of the proposed development to provide kerbside collection via Elanda Street. This is
considered to be the most suitable, efficient and safe method for refuse collection due to the topography and
size of the site. If kerbside collection using 240L bins is to occur on-street, which is consistent with the
surrounding area (for existing multiple unit dwellings), this will not generate additional vehicles on Elanda
Street and will ultimately reduce traffic impacts to both vehicles and pedestrians.
A summary of the estimated refuse generation along with detailed calculations of bin sizes, collection
frequency and storage capacity are shown in Table 5.3.
Table 5.3 Waste Generation
Multiple Dwelling Type 4 Conventional Waste Generation
Type Units Waste Recycling
3-bedroom 5
1:2 1:2
2-bedroom 1
Total 6 3 3
Refuse Collection Room Size (m2) 2.6
17
Page 18
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
Kerbside Frontage Required (m) 4
Kerbside Frontage Provided (m) 4
Based on Councils waste planning scheme policy, 3 x 240L waste bins (collected weekly) and 3 x 240L recycling
bins (collected fortnightly) has been provided. This equates to a total of 6 bins and with 585mm of bin width x
730mm of bin depth, a total frontage width of 4m would be required to accommodate these bins. The
available frontage width would be 8m, which is considered sufficient. The layout provides for sufficient
storage room and frontage capacity to accommodate the required waste and recycle bins.
On or before each collection day, designated personnel will transfer all bins from the refuse room to the
kerbside for servicing by Council’s side-loading Waste Collection Vehicle (WCV). This will be done by means of
a bin tug and trailer with details provided in Appendix D. Due to the side-loading vehicle arrangements, the
time to service a wheelie bin is approximately 10 seconds maximum per bin which will result in an anticipated
30 seconds maximum per week and 60 seconds every second week (waste and recycling). As such, the extent
of time that a WCV will be stopped within the frontage of the subject site is not considered to negatively
impact the Elanda Street environment. Based on the above, ITE believe that kerbside collection is a suitable
outcome given the precedence along the street for existing multiple unit dwellings.
4.2.2 Occasional Servicing
The specific service vehicle needs for a development should be determined having regard to land use, yield,
location and potential impacts to the pedestrian environment and adjacent road network, including on-street
parking.
The proposed servicing arrangement has also responded to the site and associated constraints, which limit the
ability to accommodate servicing on the site; best facilitate servicing commensurate with the development. As
such, the development proposes to accommodate only six (6) residential units. Thus, for confirmation that the
proposed service arrangements are acceptable, ITE have estimated the service vehicle requirements
generated by each aspect of the development, the resultant vehicle frequency and assessed the potential
impact on the road environment.
Maintenance
A ute or van is the typical vehicle used for maintenance operations at residential developments of this scale.
The frequency of vehicles larger than those mentioned is expected to be less than 1 per month. It is
considered that there would be a very low probability of parking demand overlap between a VAN (for
maintenance) and a visitor using the visitor bay. Mainly due to the nature of such operations where visitors
access residential properties outside of normal business hours and on weekends when maintenance vehicles
are in the majority not in operation. Minimal demand overlap would thus occur. The overall frequency of
service vehicles to access the premises would be approximately 1 truck per every 3 months, which further
emphasis the negligible impact on parking demand overlap. Adequate parking bay reciprocity can thus be
accommodated for.
18
Page 19
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
Furniture
The development scheme consists of 6 units and it is anticipated that these units will have a low turnover rate.
It is expected that the average occupancy rate will be 3 years. This assumption is considered to be reflective of
similar properties within the area being owned for significant periods of time and an absence of properties
being taken to the market. Based on this, the expected service vehicle movements (based on 6 units) will be
approximately 2 movements per year. It is also expected that residents will occasionally have furniture
delivered. To account for this, a delivery rate of 1 delivery per 2 units has been assumed. This equates to 3
deliveries each year. The total impact of residential turnover and large deliveries will be 5 vehicle movements
per year, approximately 1 every 2-3 months. Sufficient on-street parking opportunities are available to
accommodate for service vehicle needs. On-street parking is used for servicing provisions of the majority of
surrounding developments as illustrated in Figure 5.1.
Figure 5.1: Existing On-Street Servicing
Source: Google Street View, 2024
19
Page 20
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
Overall, the service vehicle provisions for the multi-unit dwelling are considered acceptable and ‘fit-for
purpose.’ Which aligns with the existing nature of operations along Elanda Street and as such no worsening is
expected.
5.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Conclusion
The traffic and transportation aspects of the proposed development are considered acceptable and generally
in line with council and AS2890.1 requirements. It is proposed that the development be approved from a
traffic engineering point of view.
Approved by:
Herman Joubert M.Eng (CIV), CPEng (NZ), CEng (U.K), RPEQ
[email protected]
ITE Consulting
RPEQ No.: 25899
20
Page 21
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT ENGINEERS
APPENDIX
Layout Plan
21
Page 22
A B C D E F G H Ha
6,000 7,728 3,373 6,455 3,400 6,000 4,912
BACK
1.5M SET
| 47.157m
48°24'00"
PERTY BOUNDARY
PRO
1:8
WALL UNDER RAMP
1:
DRIVEWAY
8
1:4
3,600
STORAGE AREA UNDER RAMP
1 1
1:8
3,000
LL
RAMP WA
UNDER RAMP PARKING AREA
2.233m
2 2
1:16
IN GROUND CAR IN GROUND CAR IN GROUND CAR
40" | 2
STACKER STACKER STACKER
1:8
5.5x2.85M 5.5x2.85M 5.5x2.85M LIFT BICYCLE 1:12
2,600
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
750 1,000
SHAFT STORAGE
'
324°49 | 11.778m
Y55°07
TBACK
C
C 375
1,100
DAR1
1&2 3&4 5&6 7 8 9 10
3 3
6M SE
BOUN
PIT
ACCESS
2,600
ERTY
VISITORS CAR PARKING GF
LIFT ACCESS AREA
PROP
4 4
8
1:
1,622
BIN 0
STORE 3.60 1:20 1:8
4
RL
5 BASEMENT
VISITORS CAR PARKING GF
GATE
PROPERT STORAGE
Y BOUND AREA
ARY
241°14'00 1.5M SETB
" | 43.15m
ACK
5
MAIN ACCESS
A B C D E F G H
Ha
REV DESCRIPTION
I P BY DATE
project:
I P
4 4
notes : north date: 23/10/24
W 1/2 W 1/2
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL 01 PRELIMINARY ISSUE PP 23/10/24
1 The designs, drawings and specification are copyright and always PROPOSED MULTIPLE RESIDENCE checked: AH
remain the property of Archend.
51 ELANDA STREET, SUNSHINE BEACH drawn: PP
2 Before commencing construction:
1 1
- Verify all dimensions and levels. client:
/ /
- Verify location and levels of all services on site. ARCHEND project P24-005
7 7
scale @ A1 :
- Verify that floor levels and finished levels will enable connection to [email protected]
0 0
title: drawing 02-01 scale @ A3 : 1:100
services. QLD. QBCC: 15143882
3 Do not scale this drawing. When in doubt refer to Designer.
FLOOR PLAN - BASEMENT revision 01 sheet: A1
GSPublisherVersion 632.0.86.0
Page 23
COMPLEX
VEL UNIT
MULTI LE
A B C D E F G H Ha
6,000 7,728 3,373 6,455 3,400 6,000 4,912
10M SETBACK
SOFT BACK
LANDSCAPING 1.5M SET
6M SETBACK
OT
UILDING N
END OF B
SURVEYE
D RL48.600
| 47.157m
48°24'00"
ARY
ROPERTY BOUND BBQ COMMUNAL
P
GARDENS
3,071
4,589
6,670
1,001
KITCHEN
RL#t
SOFT COURTYARD
3,610
1 1 CP
e
LANDSCAPING
oPZ
valu
RL49.
398 1:4 BALCONY BUP106270
valu
toPZ
5,800
3,000
e
RL#
1:8 UNIT 1 2 LIVING / DINING
89.40 m
RL49
UNIT 1
2.233m
RL
T
HOLD POIN ACCESS
2 22.75 m2 2
49
5,400
1:20
.8
.600
64
40" | 2
K
1:40 1:20 BATH
10,000
Low Vegetation ENS MASTER
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
5,000
2,600
1:8 Q LIFT SHAFT
4
'
324°49 | 11.778m
Y55°07
9.60
w.c.
4
2
3
5
6
8
9
7
1
6,470 00
BED 2 w.c.
0
UP
Custom Text
9,039 .
RL49
49
DAR1
RL4
STAIR COURTYARD
1,501 501 3 L
R2,800 3,200 27.95 m2
3
1,500
1 2 UNIT 1 BBQ GROUND FLOOR
BOUN
.599
GATE ACCESS COMMUNAL
UNIT 2
95
POOL
14
10
12
13
15
16
18
17
11
2,600
BIR w.c. 88.79 m2 .9 SOFT
44 94 LANDSCAPING
ERTY
LIVING
L .9
1:20
FIRE STAIR
BATH R 43
07
EXIT 0.00 m2 DINING
LANDSCAPED
.0 RL
PROP
LANDSCAPED
5,400
48
4 VISITOR PARKING VISITOR PARKING BIR 4
RL COURTYARD
2,501
18.60 m2
1,622
SOFT LANDSCAPING
BED 2 CP
AREA Q KITCHEN GTP689
5 Low Vegetation L BALCONY
RL
25.18 m2
49
.31
4
LETTERB UNIT 2 w.c.
OX
ACCESS K
ENS
MASTER
TBACK
UNIT 2
GATE ACCESS
0
8.80
PROPERT
6M SE
Y BOUND
ARY 241°
14'00 " | 43.15m
RL4
EXISTING
STRIP VEG
ETATION T
O BE RE-D SOFT
ESIGNED 1.5M SETB
LANDSCAPING ACK
EXISTING
5
PEDESTR
IAN FOOT BASEMEN
PATH & ST
AIRS TO B
E RE-DES ACCESS F T
IGNED RO
PEDESTR M
IAN
FOOTPAT
H
A B C D E F G H
1
2
3 Ha
4 5 6
7
8 9 10 11
B U CP
P3
58
5
REV DESCRIPTION
I P BY DATE
project:
I P
4 4
notes : north date: 23/10/24
W 1/2 W 1/2
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL 01 PRELIMINARY ISSUE PP 23/10/24
1 The designs, drawings and specification are copyright and always PROPOSED MULTIPLE RESIDENCE checked: AH
remain the property of Archend.
51 ELANDA STREET, SUNSHINE BEACH drawn: PP
2 Before commencing construction:
1 1
- Verify all dimensions and levels. client:
/ /
- Verify location and levels of all services on site. ARCHEND project P24-005
7 7
scale @ A1 :
- Verify that floor levels and finished levels will enable connection to [email protected]
0 0
title: drawing 02-02 scale @ A3 : 1:100
services. QLD. QBCC: 15143882
3 Do not scale this drawing. When in doubt refer to Designer.
FLOOR PLAN - GROUND revision 01 sheet: A1
GSPublisherVersion 632.0.86.0
Page 24
1 2 3 4 5
ROOF ROOF
57.900 57.900
3,100
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2
54.800 54.800
3,100
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1
51.700 51.700
3,100
GROUND GROUND
48.600 48.600
SLAB TO BE CHAMFERED
LOCALLY OVER RAMP TO
ACHIEVE 2,2M MINIMUM
2,523
2,280
CLEARANCE
4,900
3,829
200
2,376
LIFT ACCESS
2,221
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
BASEMENT BASEMENT
43.700 43.700
190 1,603 4,065 7,910
2 3PM SUMMER SOLSTICE 1:50
I
REV DESCRIPTION
P BY DATE
project:
I P
4 4
notes : north date:
W 1/2 W 1/2
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
1 The designs, drawings and specification are copyright and always PROPOSED MULTIPLE RESIDENCE checked: AH
remain the property of Archend.
51 ELANDA STREET, SUNSHINE BEACH drawn: PP
2 Before commencing construction:
1 1
- Verify all dimensions and levels. client:
/ /
- Verify location and levels of all services on site. ARCHEND project P24-005
7 7
scale @ A1 : 1:50
- Verify that floor levels and finished levels will enable connection to [email protected]
0 0
title: drawing 05-03 scale @ A3 : 1:100
services. QLD. QBCC: 15143882
3 Do not scale this drawing. When in doubt refer to Designer. 1 SCALE 1:50 1:50
SECTION B revision sheet: A1
GSPublisherVersion 632.0.86.0
Page 25
51 Elanda Street TIS
2024-11-25
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT ENGINEERS
APPENDIX
Vehicle Swept Paths
Page 26
Vehicle:
A B C D
6,000 7,728 3,373
10M SETBACK
6M SETBACK
OT
UILDING N
END OF B
D
SURVEYE
ARY
Y BOUND
Turn Path:
PROPERT
3,071
6,670
1,001
RL#
SOFT
3,610
alue
1
toPZ
LANDSCAPING
RL 4 9
.398 1:4
v
toPZ
valu
5,800
3,000
e
RL#
1:8
RL4
RL
INT
H OLD P O
49
2
5,400
9.60
1:20
.8
64
0
1:40 1:20
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
Low Vegetation
5,000
2,600
1:8
4
324°49 | 11.778m
9.60
4
2
1
8
7
6
5
3
9
6,470 00
9.0
UP
Custom Text
9,039
RL4
STAIR
1,500 1,501 501 3 L4
R2,800 1 3,200 2 UNIT 1 27.95 m2
GATE ACCESS
34 Flamingo Crescent ITE CONSULTING
14
10
12
13
15
16
18
17
11
2,600
Thornlands
Queensland
4164
1:20
FIRE STAIR Tel: 0424 110 122 [email protected]
7 EXIT www.iteconsulting.com.au
LANDSCAPED LANDSCAPED
.00
5,400
4 VISITOR PARKING VISITOR PARKING
48
NAME: RPEQ: DATE:
RL COURTYARD DESIGNED: -
Herman Joubert 25899 2024/11/12
1,622
DRAWN:
18.60 m2 CHECKED: Herman Joubert 25899 2024/11/12
SOFT LANDSCAPING COPYRIGHT RESERVED
AREA
5 R Low Vegetation PROJECT:
L49
.31
4
51 Elanda Street
LETTERB
OX
DRAWING TITLE:
UNIT 2 AS2890.1:2004 B85
GATE ACCESS Swept Path
0
8.80
PROPERT
Y BOU NDARY SCALE: REV:
-
RL4
1:83 DATE:
2024/11/12
DRAWING NUMBER:
01
C:\Users\joube\OneDrive - iteconsulting.com.au\6. Projects\0248_51 Elanda Street\Updated 2024 10 24\241024_BALEIAS_Preliminary Issue_dwg\02-02 FLOOR PLAN - GROUND.dwg
Page 27
Vehicle:
A B C D
6,000 7,728 3,373
10M SETBACK
6M SETBACK
OT
UILDING N
END OF B
D
SURVEYE
ARY
Y BOUND
Turn Path:
PROPERT
3,071
6,670
1,001
RL#
SOFT
3,610
alue
1
toPZ
LANDSCAPING
RL 4 9
.398 1:4
v
toPZ
valu
5,800
3,000
e
RL#
1:8
RL4
RL
INT
H OLD P O
49
2
5,400
9.60
1:20
.8
64
0
1:40 1:20
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
Low Vegetation
5,000
2,600
1:8
4
324°49 | 11.778m
9.60
4
2
1
8
7
6
5
3
9
6,470 00
9.0
UP
Custom Text
9,039
RL4
STAIR
1,500 1,501 501 3 L4
R2,800 1 3,200 2 UNIT 1 27.95 m2
GATE ACCESS
34 Flamingo Crescent ITE CONSULTING
14
10
12
13
15
16
18
17
11
2,600
Thornlands
Queensland
4164
1:20
FIRE STAIR Tel: 0424 110 122 [email protected]
7 EXIT www.iteconsulting.com.au
LANDSCAPED LANDSCAPED
.00
5,400
4 VISITOR PARKING VISITOR PARKING
48
NAME: RPEQ: DATE:
RL COURTYARD DESIGNED: -
Herman Joubert 25899 2024/11/12
1,622
DRAWN:
18.60 m2 CHECKED: Herman Joubert 25899 2024/11/12
SOFT LANDSCAPING COPYRIGHT RESERVED
AREA
5 R Low Vegetation PROJECT:
L49
.31
4
51 Elanda Street
LETTERB
OX
DRAWING TITLE:
UNIT 2 AS2890.1:2004 B85
GATE ACCESS Swept Path
0
8.80
PROPERT
Y BOU NDARY SCALE: REV:
-
RL4
1:83 DATE:
2024/11/12
DRAWING NUMBER:
02
C:\Users\joube\OneDrive - iteconsulting.com.au\6. Projects\0248_51 Elanda Street\Updated 2024 10 24\241024_BALEIAS_Preliminary Issue_dwg\02-02 FLOOR PLAN - GROUND.dwg
Page 28
Vehicle:
CAR PARKING UNDER RAMP
G H Ha
E F
C D 6,000 4,912
B 6,455 3,400
7,728 3,373
Turn Path:
7m
" | 47.15
48°24'00
N DARY
TY BOU
PROPER
1:8
WALL UNDER RAMP
1:8
00
Y
DRIVEWA 1:4
36
STORAGE AREA UNDER RAMP
500mm Safety
1:8
Clearance
Vehicle Boudy
Wheel Path
ALL
RAMP W
UNDER RAMP PARKING AREA
1:16
1:8
IN GROUND CAR IN GROUND CAR BICYCLE 1:12
IN GROUND CAR LIFT
STACKER STACKER STORAGE
STACKER 5.5x2.85M SHAFT
00
5.5x2.85M 5.5x2.85M
6M SET
10
5
37
CC
0
75 9 10
BACK
00 5&6 7 8
11 1&2 3&4
PIT
ACCESS
LIFT ACCESS AREA
VISITORS CAR PARKING GF
8
1:
34 Flamingo Crescent ITE CONSULTING
Thornlands
1:8 Queensland
00
1:20 4164
BIN .6
STORE 43
RL
BASEMENT Tel: 0424 110 122 [email protected]
www.iteconsulting.com.au
NAME: RPEQ: DATE:
DESIGNED: -
VISITORS CAR PARKING GF DRAWN: Herman Joubert 25899 2024/11/12
CHECKED: Herman Joubert 25899 2024/11/12
GATE COPYRIGHT RESERVED
PROJECT:
STORAGE AREA
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY 1.5M SETBAC
241°14'00" |
43.15m
K 51 Elanda Street
DRAWING TITLE:
MAIN ACCESS
AS2890.1:2004 B85
G H Swept Path
E F
C D
B
Ha
SCALE: REV:
-
1:110 DATE:
2024/11/12
DRAWING NUMBER:
07
C:\Users\joube\OneDrive - iteconsulting.com.au\6. Projects\0248_51 Elanda Street\Updated 2024 10 24\241024_BALEIAS_Preliminary Issue_dwg\02-01 FLOOR PLAN - BASEMENT.dwg
Page 29
Vehicle:
CAR PARKING UNDER RAMP
G H Ha
E F
C D 6,000 4,912
B 6,455 3,400
7,728 3,373
Turn Path:
7m
" | 47.15
48°24'00
N DARY
TY BOU
PROPER
1:8
WALL UNDER RAMP
1:8
00
Y
DRIVEWA 1:4
36
STORAGE AREA UNDER RAMP
500mm Safety
1:8 Clearance
Vehicle Boudy
Wheel Path
ALL
RAMP W
UNDER RAMP PARKING AREA
1:16
1:8
IN GROUND CAR IN GROUND CAR BICYCLE 1:12
IN GROUND CAR LIFT
STACKER STACKER STORAGE
STACKER 5.5x2.85M SHAFT
00
5.5x2.85M 5.5x2.85M
6M SET
10
5
37
CC
0
75 9 10
BACK
00 5&6 7 8
11 1&2 3&4
PIT
ACCESS
LIFT ACCESS AREA
VISITORS CAR PARKING GF
8
1:
34 Flamingo Crescent ITE CONSULTING
Thornlands
1:8 Queensland
00
1:20 4164
BIN .6
STORE 43
RL
BASEMENT Tel: 0424 110 122 [email protected]
www.iteconsulting.com.au
NAME: RPEQ: DATE:
DESIGNED: -
VISITORS CAR PARKING GF DRAWN: Herman Joubert 25899 2024/11/12
CHECKED: Herman Joubert 25899 2024/11/12
GATE COPYRIGHT RESERVED
PROJECT:
STORAGE AREA
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY 1.5M SETBAC
241°14'00" |
43.15m
K 51 Elanda Street
DRAWING TITLE:
MAIN ACCESS
AS2890.1:2004 B99
G H Swept Path
E F
C D
B
Ha
SCALE: REV:
-
1:110 DATE:
2024/11/12
DRAWING NUMBER:
05
C:\Users\joube\OneDrive - iteconsulting.com.au\6. Projects\0248_51 Elanda Street\Updated 2024 10 24\241024_BALEIAS_Preliminary Issue_dwg\02-01 FLOOR PLAN - BASEMENT.dwg
The text continues on page 30.