Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-11 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 5 - Final New Noosa Plan - Part 1-6 - Clean version
The original of this document is very large (15.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn (b) code assessment prevails over accepted development where subject to requirements and accepted development
(c) impact assessment prevails over code assessment, accepted development where subject to requirements and accepted
development.
(8) Despite subsubsections 5.3.2 (4) and (7) above, a category of assessment in a zone and a category of assessment in an overlay
overrides a category of assessment in a zone or local plan.
(9) Provisions of Part 10 Other plans section may override any of the above.
(10) The category of development prescribed under Schedule 6 of the Regulation override all other categories of development or
assessment for that development under the planning scheme to the extent of any inconsistency.
Editor's Note—There are no provisions in Part 10.
Editor's Note—Schedule 7 of the Regulation also identifies development that the state categorises as accepted development. Some development in the
schedule may still be made assessable under the planning scheme.
(11) Despite all of the above, if development is listed as prohibited development under schedule 10 of the Regulation, a development
application cannot be made.
Note—Development is to be taken to be prohibited development under the planning scheme only if it is identified in schedule 10 of the Regulation.
5.3.3 Determining the requirements for accepted development and assessment
benchmarks and other matters for assessable development
(1) Accepted development does not require a development approval and is not subject to assessment benchmarks. However, certain
requirements may apply to some types of development for it to be accepted development. Where nominated in the tables of
assessment, accepted development must comply with the requirements identified as acceptable outcomes in the relevant parts of
the applicable code(s) as identified in the relevant column.
(2) Accepted development that does not comply with one or more of the nominated acceptable outcomes in the relevant parts of the
applicable code(s) becomes code assessable development unless otherwise specified.
(3) The following rules apply in determining assessment benchmarks for each category of development and assessment:
(4) Code assessable development:
(a) is to be assessed against all the assessment benchmarks identified in the assessment benchmarks column;
(b) that occurs as a result of development becoming code assessable pursuant to subsection 5.3.3(2), must:
(i) be assessed against the assessment benchmarks for the development application, limited to the subject matter of
the required acceptable outcomes that were not complied with or were not capable of being complied with under
subsection 5.3.3(2)
(ii) comply with all required acceptable outcomes identified in subsection 5.3.3(1), other than those mentioned in sub
section 5.3.3(2);
(c) that complies with the performance or acceptable outcomes complies with the purpose and overall outcomes of the code;
(d) is to be assessed against any assessment benchmarks for the development identified in section 26 of the Regulation.
Editor's Note—Section 27 of the Regulation identifies the matters code assessment must have regard to.
(5) Impact assessable development:
(a) is to be assessed against the identified assessment benchmarks in the assessment benchmarks column (where
relevant)
(b) is to be assessed having regard to the whole of the planning scheme, to the extent relevant
(c) is to be assessed against any assessment benchmarks for the development identified in section 30 of the Regulation
Note—The first row of each table of assessment is to be checked to confirm if there are assessment benchmarks that commonly apply to general
scenarios in the zone, local plan or overlay.
Editor's Note—Section 31 of the Regulation identifies the matters that impact assessment must have regard to.
**FINAL DRAFT Post Consultation 2019**
Page 2 of 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.