Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

Crilley 2014_Identification of the sources of primary organic aerosols a...

Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission (1) Object - Jennifer Drysdale.

Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submissions Object - Petition - Various.

of 8

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

                                                                 Environmental Pollution 191 (2014) 158e165



                                                              Contents lists available at ScienceDirect


                                                             Environmental Pollution
                                               journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envpol




Identification of the sources of primary organic aerosols at urban
schools: A molecular marker approach
Leigh R. Crilley a,1, Raeed M. Qadir b, c, Godwin A. Ayoko a, *, Jürgen Schnelle-Kreis b,
Gülcin Abbaszade b, Jürgen Orasche b, Ralf Zimmermann b, c, Lidia Morawska a
a
  International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD
4001, Australia
b
  Joint Mass Spectrometry Centre e Comprehensive Molecular Analytics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, D-85764 Neuherberg,
Germany
c
  Institute of Chemistry, University of Rostock, Dr.-Lorenz-Weg 1, D-18051 Rostock, Germany




a r t i c l e i n f o                                  a b s t r a c t

Article history:                                       Children are particularly susceptible to air pollution and schools are examples of urban microenviron-
Received 18 January 2014                               ments that can account for a large portion of children’s exposure to airborne particles. Thus this paper
Received in revised form                               aimed to determine the sources of primary airborne particles that children are exposed to at school by
14 April 2014
                                                       analyzing selected organic molecular markers at 11 urban schools in Brisbane, Australia. Positive matrix
Accepted 17 April 2014
                                                       factorization analysis identified four sources at the schools: vehicle emissions, biomass burning, meat
Available online 20 May 2014
                                                       cooking and plant wax emissions accounting for 45%, 29%, 16% and 7%, of the organic carbon respectively.
                                                       Biomass burning peaked in winter due to prescribed burning of bushland around Brisbane. Overall, the
Keywords:
Positive matrix factorization
                                                       results indicated that both local (traffic) and regional (biomass burning) sources of primary organic
Sources                                                aerosols influence the levels of ambient particles that children are exposed at the schools. These results
Primary organic aerosols                               have implications for potential control strategies for mitigating exposure at schools.
Exposure                                                                                                                 Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Schools




1. Introduction                                                                            characteristic of a specific emission source and crucially also have a
                                                                                           long lifetime in the atmosphere to enable detection at monitoring
    Organic aerosols are frequently the largest component of                               stations (Cass, 1998). Examples of some of the more specific organic
ambient fine particles in urban atmospheres (Jimenez et al., 2009).                         markers include levoglucosan for biomass burning (Robinson et al.,
These aerosols are a complex mixture of around 105 and 106                                 2006a) and cholesterol for meat cooking (Kleeman et al., 2008).
compounds (Goldstein and Galbally, 2007) from a number of pri-                             Hopanes are present in fossil fuels, and the different hopanoid
mary and secondary sources, where sources that directly emit                               compounds are specific to the different types of fossil fuels such as
particles into the atmosphere can be referred to as primary sources.                       coal, petroleum and lubricating oil ((Schnelle-Kreis et al., 2005) and
Whereas secondary sources refer to particles formed by reactions                           references therein)). Thus these organic compounds along with
in the atmosphere of gaseous species in the atmosphere, such as                            others can be used as molecular markers for identifying the
the photo-oxidation of volatile organic compounds (Seinfeld and                            contributing sources of primary organics to ambient particles.
Pandis, 2006). In an urban environment primary sources of parti-                              A quantitative assessment of the contribution of emission
cles can include vehicle emissions, biomass burning (from both                             sources is available using positive matrix factorization (PMF),
domestic and natural sources), coal combustion, cooking, plant                             which has been successfully applied previously to organic molec-
abrasion and paved road dust (see e.g. (Qadir et al., 2013; Schnelle-                      ular datasets (Qadir et al., 2013; Schnelle-Kreis et al., 2007; Shriv-
Kreis et al., 2007; Shrivastava et al., 2007)). For these primary                          astava et al., 2007). Assessing the contribution of primary sources is
sources there are a number of organic markers that are known to be                         important as there are numerous detrimental health effects asso-
                                                                                           ciated with exposure to airborne particles (Heal et al., 2012; Rückerl
                                                                                           et al., 2011). In particular, children have been shown to be more
 * Corresponding author.                                                                   susceptible to the health effects associated with exposure to
    E-mail address: [email protected] (G.A. Ayoko).                                       airborne particles (Rückerl et al., 2011), and several studies have
  1
    Present address: School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Science, Uni-            linked exposure to vehicle emissions to increased risks of
versity of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.04.023
0269-7491/Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Log in to download the original file

Crilley 2014_Identification of the sources of primary organic aerosols a....pdf · 545 KB (small file)

Full text of the other 7 pages

Page 2

                                                            L.R. Crilley et al. / Environmental Pollution 191 (2014) 158e165                                                     159


developing asthma and wheezing (Gehring et al., 2010; Ryan et al.,                             organic compounds (e.g. levoglucosan and cholesterol) occurs directly from par-
2009). Children spend a large portion of their day at school.                                  ticulate matter on the filters. Therefore, polar and non-polar compounds are
                                                                                               analyzed in one step. An automated sampling robot exchanged the complete GC
Consequently schools represent a location accounting for a signif-                             liners placed in the injector which is automatically closed and opened by a liner
icant fraction of their overall daily exposure. Schools are also                               exchanging unit (Linex, Atas GL, Netherlands). During thermal desorption (16 min,
unique urban environments that are influenced not only by local                                 300  C) MSTFA enriched carrier gas was passed through the liner. Desorbed and
and regional sources but also by school-related activities such as                             derivatized molecules were focused at 70  C on the head of a nearly non-polar
                                                                                               capillary column, BPX5, 25 m, 0.22 mm ID, 0.25 mm film (SGE, Australia) which
drop-off/pick-up traffic, which may result in increased exposure to
                                                                                               was installed in an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph (Agilent, USA). After the
vehicle emissions. However, there is limited information on chil-                              isothermal run at 70  C, the temperature was increased to 130  C within one minute.
dren’s exposure to vehicle emissions and other sources in the                                  Then the rate was lowered to 8  C min1 until a temperature of 330  C was reached
literature (Mejía et al., 2011).                                                               followed by an isothermal time of 30 min. The detection of compounds was carried
    Considering the aforementioned gaps in knowledge, the present                              out on a Pegasus III TOFMS (LECO, USA). The data acquisition frequency was 25
                                                                                               spectra per second within a mass-to-charge range of 35e500. The detection limits
study aimed to determine the primary sources of the ambient fine                                for the targeted compounds can be found in Tables S1 and S2 (Supporting
particulate matter present at urban schools by quantifying the                                 Information).
levels of selected organic molecular markers. PMF, a receptor model                                 Details of the elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) analysis can be
(Paatero and Tapper, 1994), was applied in order to quantitatively                             found in Crilley (2013). Briefly, PM2.5 samples were collected concurrently at the
                                                                                               same location at each school and were analyzed according to the IMPROVE method
determine the contributions of these sources to levels of ambient
                                                                                               on a thermal/optical transmittance carbon analyser (Sunset Laboratories) (Chow
particles at the schools. This enabled the driving factors to the                              et al., 2001).
levels of different primary sources to be investigated and we hy-
pothesized that vehicle emissions will be the main primary source
                                                                                               2.4. Data analysis
contributing to children’s exposure at school and this is reflected in
the schools’ selection criteria, outlined in the next section.                                     Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) was performed in this study using the EPA
                                                                                               PMF v3.0, developed by the U.S EPA (US-EPA and Research Triangle Park N, 2008). A
                                                                                               total of 21 organic compounds were used in the initial analysis and these included n-
2. Method
                                                                                               alkanes from C20e33, four hopanes, cholesterol, dehydroabietic acid and its meth-
2.1. Sampling sites                                                                            ylester, levoglucosan, mannosan, EC and the OC fraction. Missing values in a certain
                                                                                               school site were replaced with the geometric mean at the same site and the un-
     The 11 schools selected for this study, which will be referred to as S15 to S25, are
                                                                                               certainty was set to four times the geometric mean for those values. As about 80% of
in different suburbs in the city of Brisbane, Australia. A map depicting the schools
                                                                                               n-alkanes between C18 and C21 are typically in the gas phase, therefore these
location in Brisbane is given in Figure S1, Supporting Information. This chemical
                                                                                               compounds were excluded from the PMF analysis. Species with more than 50% of
sampling was a part of a larger campaign to study the effect of ultrafine particle from
                                                                                               data below the limit of quantification (LOQ) were also excluded from the inputs.
traffic emissions on children’s health, known as UPTECH (www.ilaqh.qut.edu.au/
                                                                                               Therefore, some alkanes (C20, C21, C26, C28, C32 and C33), dehydroabietic acid and its
Misc/UPTECH%20Home.htm). In this study 25 schools participated but only at the
                                                                                               methylester, and mannosan were excluded from the PMF analyses. In other few
last 11 schools were filters collected for this analysis due to instrument availability.
                                                                                               cases the values were replaced with half of the LOQ and the uncertainties set to 5/6
The sampling campaign for the current paper was conducted from November 2011
                                                                                               of the LOQ. For the other data, the uncertainties are set according to the following
till August 2012.
                                                                                               equation:
     The schools that were chosen were not near any other large source of air
pollution, other than road traffic and were also not close to any large infrastructure             h                                            i0:5
projects. A site close to the middle of the school which gave the best overall rep-            u ¼ ðerror fraction  concentrationÞ2 þ ðLOQ Þ2                                    (1)
resentation was chosen to conduct the measurements and sampling at each school.
Inlets for the sampling were placed on the top of a trailer, which served to house all         where error fraction is the percentage of uncertainty, LOQ is the limit of quantifi-
of the instruments at the site including an automatic weather station (Monitor                 cation. Overall error fractions were estimated from sampling and analytical errors.
Sensors). Data from nearby weather stations was also obtained from the Bureau of               Species with low signal to noise ratio (S/R < 2), were assigned as weak. One hundred
Meteorology (BOM) and Queensland Department of Science, Information Technol-                   bootstrap runs were performed to assess the uncertainty of the factor loadings and
ogy, Innovation and the Arts (DSITIA) as some of the schools would have been                   profiles. Changing the Fpeak value did not improve the source profiles or Q value and
affected by local winds due to schools buildings. Sampling inlets were approxi-                so base model results (Fpeak ¼ 0) are reported. The PMF solutions are discussed in
mately 3 m off the ground. Traffic counts were taken on the busiest road next to the            Section 3.3.
school, referred to as the main road throughout. In the traffic count, vehicles that                The other data analysis technique employed was one way ANOVA used to
were classified as light were cars, motorbikes and scooters. Trucks with 2, 3 and 4             compare the concentrations between the seasons and this was performed using
axels were classified as medium vehicle and long articulated trucks classified as                SPSS v19.
heavy vehicles.


2.2. Sampling methodology                                                                      3. Results and discussion
    The particle size fraction was selected using a low-volume PM2.5 cyclone and the
required flow rate for the cyclone was maintained using critical orifices. The parti-            3.1. General school characteristics
cles were collected in polycarbonate filter holders on 47 mm, Quartz fiber filters
(Whatman) which was pre-treated at 500  C for 1 h prior to use. The sampling
                                                                                                   The sampling was conducted over almost a full year and covered
period was from 08:00 until 08:00 the next day, Monday to Friday for one week to
give a total of four samples at each school. This sampling regime typically gave               both winter and summer, as reflected in the meteorological con-
sampling volumes of 6 m3. After sampling each filter was placed in a Petri dish and             ditions described in Table 1. Brisbane is a subtropical city with the
covered in aluminum foil. The samples were then sealed in a ziplock bag and frozen             mean temperatures ranging from 14 to 25  C (Table 1). October till
until analysis. The flow rate for the cyclones was checked at the beginning of each             April is warmer with higher humidity and this period is referred to
sample and always set to within 0.1 L per minute of the desired flow rate. Field
                                                                                               as summer. May till September is cooler with typically more stable
blanks were collected at each school and all results were field-blank corrected.
                                                                                               weather and it is referred to as the winter months. A range of traffic
2.3. Chemical analysis                                                                         conditions were also observed at the schools (Table 2). Some of the
                                                                                               schools were on busy arterial roads (S19, S20) while others were in
    The organic composition of the samples was analyzed using In-situ Derivati-
zation Thermal Desorption (IDTD) followed by Gas Chromatography Time-Of-Flight                 residential areas with low traffic counts (S16, S18, S21). There were
Mass Spectrometry (GC-TOF-MS) (Orasche et al., 2011; Schnelle-Kreis et al., 2011) at           also schools alongside roads that service commercial/light indus-
the Joint Mass Spectrometry Centre, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg,                     trial areas (S23, S25) and such schools recorded a higher proportion
Germany. In brief, filter punches were placed in an injection liner and spiked with             of heavy and medium vehicles (Table 2). Based on the organic
internal standards (isotope labeled reference compounds) and 10 ml derivatizing
agent N-Methyl-N-trimethylsilyl-trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA). The method allows
                                                                                               compounds detected and their relative abundance, the major
derivatization using MSTFA reagent of the polar organic fraction of filter samples in-          contributing sources of primary organic aerosols were determined
situ on the filter during thermal desorption. Derivatization and desorption of polar            at the schools and discussed in the next sections.

Page 3

160                                                    L.R. Crilley et al. / Environmental Pollution 191 (2014) 158e165

Table 1
Average meteorological conditions of the schools studied during the sampling week. Note that temperature and relative humidity readings were taken from the school weather
station while wind speed measurements were taken from the closest BOM or DSTIA station.

                           S15          S16           S17          S18            S19            S20           S21        S22        S23         S24           S25

 Sampling date             Nov 2011     Nov 2011      Dec 2012     Mar 2012       Mar 2012       Apr 2012      Jun 2012   Jun 2012   Jul 2012    Aug 2012      Aug 2012
 Temperature ( C)         24           25            24           22             23             20            14         14         15          15            15
 Relative humidity (%)     65           75            71           71             79             63            58         66         60          40            68
 Wind Speed (m s1)        4.1          1.0           0.91         1.0            3.3            0.7           0.8        0.6        0.7         3.0           3.5


3.2. Detected organic compounds at the schools                                             vehicle emissions than plant wax emissions. This was probably
                                                                                           because the schools sampled in summer recorded higher traffic
    A number of particulate organic compounds were detected at                             flows (e.g. S15, S19 and S20). At the schools sampled in winter there
the schools as summarized in Table 3, which demonstrates that the                          was a higher abundance of plant wax alkanes (C>27) compared to
organic species and their concentrations varied from school to                             the schools sampled in summer (Fig. 1). Plant waxes alkanes can
school. Of the analyzed species, the most abundant organic com-                            come from either abrasion of vegetation detritus and incomplete
pound was generally levoglucosan, which was detected at all of the                         biomass burning (Cass, 1998; Pietrogrande et al., 2011; Simoneit,
schools except for S16 (Table 3). Of the other anhydrous sugars                            2002). In Brisbane, most trees are evergreen and winter is the
targeted, mannosan and galactosan were detected only at schools                            driest time of year, increasing the likelihood of emissions from leaf
sampled in winter, at S21-5 and S22, S24-5, respectively (Table 3).                        abrasion. In addition, the practice of prescribed burning of bush-
The most abundant resin acids detected were dehydroabietic acid                            land, described in more detail in Section 3.3.3, would also explain
(DHAA) and dehydroabietic acid methylester (DHAA-ME), and                                  the higher abundance of alkanes from plant wax during winter.
these compounds were observed only at the schools sampled in                                   Further differentiation between vehicle emissions and biogenic
summer (Table 3). Cholesterol, a known tracer molecule for meat                            sources is possible by determining the Cmax, which refers to the
cooking emissions, was observed at the schools (Table 3) (Kleeman                          most abundant alkane at each school, from the data in Table 3.
et al., 2008), indicates that cooking was a source. The most abun-                         Diesel and gasoline vehicle emissions have a different Cmax, at C20
dant hopanes were 17a(H),21b(H)-30-norhopane (29ab) and                                    and C23e5, respectively while plant wax emissions typically have a
17a(H),21b(H)-hopane (30ab) at all of the schools. In addition,                            Cmax above C27 (Cass, 1998; Rogge et al., 1993a; Schnelle-Kreis et al.,
17a(H),21b(H)-22S-homohopane (31abS) and 17a(H),21b(H)-22R-                                2011, 2005). At the schools sampled in summer the Cmax was
homohopane (31abR) were detected at S18-25 in appreciable                                  similar to that expected for gasoline vehicles (C23e5) whereas at
quantities. The n-alkanes analyzed were octadecane (C18) to hex-                           schools sampled in the winter, the Cmax was within the range for
atriacontane (C36) and their concentrations and distributions varied                       plant waxes (C>27). The exception was S23, which had a Cmax of 24
across the schools. The average values for each alkane at the schools                      and this indicates that vehicle emissions were the most likely major
are given in Table S2 (Supporting Information), with the sum of n-                         contributing source of n-alkanes at this school. Carbon preference
alkanes summarized in Table 3. Throughout this paper, the n-al-                            index (CPI) value, which is defined as the ratio of the sum con-
kanes are referred to as Cn, where n indicates the number of carbon                        centration of odd- to even-carbon numbered n-alkanes, has been
atoms. For example, pentacosane is referred to as C25. All abbrevi-                        widely used to distinguish between sources of n-alkanes (Brown
ations are listed in Table S2. The range of n-alkanes detected at the                      et al., 2002). Vehicle emissions are expected to have a ratio
schools indicated that fossil fuel combustion was another signifi-                          around 1 whereas plant waxes are expected to have a ratio >2
cant source at the schools, which is investigated further in the next                      (Schnelle-Kreis et al., 2007). In Table 3, the schools with a CPI
section.                                                                                   around 1 were S18, S19, S20, S22 and S23, which were generally the
                                                                                           schools beside comparatively higher trafficked roads. However, the
3.3. Sources of primary PM2.5 based on the detected organic                                CPI at S15e17 would suggest an influence from plant waxes in
compounds                                                                                  addition to that from vehicle emissions. Thus, from the n-alkanes it
                                                                                           was difficult to distinguish between the contributions of sources,
3.3.1. n-alkane concentrations and distribution                                            though it is clear that the two main sources were likely to be vehicle
    The concentration of the targeted n-alkanes is presented in                            emissions and plant waxes. Further investigations of the influence
Fig. 1, averaged for schools sampled during summer and winter.                             of vehicle emissions were possible by analyzing the concentrations
Vehicles emit alkanes in the range of C19e32 (Rogge et al., 1993a).                        and distributions of the hopanes.
The majority of the detected alkanes were observed in this range,
suggesting that this was the main source of alkanes at the schools.                        3.3.2. Hopane concentrations and distribution
Another possible source which has an overlapping alkane distri-                                Generally, the same hopanes distribution was found at all of the
butions are plant waxes, which are associated with alkanes greater                         schools and the average concentration for each hopane is presented
than C27 (Cass, 1998). From Table S2 and Fig. 1 alkanes within this                        in Fig. 2. The homohopane isomerization index (HHI, defined as
range were also detected, indicating that this was another potential                       31abS/31abSþ31abR) is about 0.1e0.4 for coal burning and 0.6 for
source at all schools. From Fig. 1, the schools sampled in summer                          mineral oil emission sources, such as vehicles (Oros and Simoneit,
had a higher abundance of alkanes and a higher association with                            2000; Schnelle-Kreis et al., 2011). For the schools where these


Table 2
Mean traffic conditions from the main at the schools studied over the sampling week.

                              S15          S16         S17           S18          S19             S20            S21        S22         S23            S24           S25

 Traffic (Veh hr1)            858          46          757           35           1093            1121           151        469         657            160           332
 Light vehicles (%)            92.1        97.8         95.3         97.9           89.9            96.2          97.4       96.8        71.1           97.1          92.0
 Medium vehicles (%)            5.9         1.6          3.0          2.1            3.2             2.5           2.1        2.5        28.0            2.4           6.5
 Heavy vehicles (%)             0.9         0.4          0.6          0.0            2.0             0.8           0.4        0.6         0.6            0.5           1.2

Page 4

Table 3

Average concentrations (in ng m~°) of selected hopanes and polar organic compounds along with calculated values for the alkanes at each school with average of EC and OC (in wg m~*). Abbreviat

ms of compound names are

  

given in parenthesis. CPI is defined as the ratio of the sum concentration of odd- to even-carbon numbered n-alkanes. Uncertainties are 1 standard deviation. <DL indicates below the detection

 

$25
6.1

S24
5.9
1.6

$23
37
0.9

$22

9.3

$21
7.9
15

S18 S19 $20

3.1

S17
5.6
17

S16
5.6
18

S15
6.2

Molecule

 

1.14
0.8

10.2
0.8

n-alkanes

CPI

19

1.2

0.7

2.8

Cmax

0.2 + 0.2
0.14 0.1

0.1 + 0.09
0.09 + 0.07
0.06 + 0.07
0.05 + 0.06
7.8463
<DL

<DL

0.1 + 0.06
0.2 + 0.03

0.2 + 0.03

0.03 + 0.05
0.03 + 0.05
0.03 + 0.04
0.03 + 0.04
41424
<DL

<DL

10+ 0.4
1340.6
0.7404
0.8 + 0.4
3441.7
8844.1

1.0 + 0.7
10405
0.7404
0540.3

<DL

0.9408
1141.0
0540.4
04404
0.6 + 0.4

<DL

0.8 + 04
0.5 + 0.2

0.7 +0.1

1.0 + 0.7
0.9 + 0.7
DL
DL

170(H),21B(H)-30-norhopane (29ab)

7a(H),21B(H)-hopane (30ab)

0.1 + 0.04
0.07 + 0.03
0.06 + 0.01
3441.0

0.6 + 0.02

0.07 + 0.06
0.06 + 0.06
5.3444
<DL

<DL

0.1 + 0.03
0.09 + 0.03
6.9431
<DL

<DL

DL

DL
0.7 + 1.2
44414
5.14 62

<DL

DL

DL
0.6 + 0.2
2.7438
6.9 + 46

<DL

7a(H),21B(H)-22S-homohopane (31abS)

17a(H),21B(H)-22R-homohopane (31abR)

Cholesterol

1.9 + 1.0

<DL
<DL

4549.1

34.1 + 25.8
6.2412
<DL

Dehydroabietic acid (DHAA)

17 4 15.9 14417

<DL

2.9419
<DL

Dehydroabietic acid methylester (DHAAM)

Mannosan

3.7423 0.2405 2.7416 43438

0140.14

Crilley et al. / Environmental Pollution 191 (2014) 158—165

98.7 + 84.1
0.73 + 0.13
3.51 + 0.19

130 + 67.9

86.2 + 67.5
0.67 + 0.29
1.81 + 0.66

98.3 + 36.8
1.14 + 0.33
2.25 + 1.10

45.7473 48 +172

12.8441
0.48 + 0.06
2.43 + 0.42

29.5 + 21.2
0.28 + 0.24

19.2 + 18.8
0.40 + 0.37
2.07 + 0.71

DL
0.53 + 0.04
2.04 + 0.52

44.6 + 303
0.38 + 0.11
3.03 + 0.56

Levoglucosan

0.39 + 0.12
3.01 + 0.71

0.20 + 0.10
0.62 + 0.60

0.84 + 0.40
2.18 + 0.86

Elemental carbon (EC)
Organic carbon (OC)

1.89 + 0.60

 

161

 

 

 

 

 

25
WE Summer
[23 Winter
204
Ee
P1584
©
S
©
§ 104
8
e
&
3
054
0.04
DHOMKNMYTHOKRHOSRO- AMNYTHO
S2RRNRRAKKRARABRHKBSABS
eoOO OOO OOOO OOOO OOOO oO

Fig. 1. Average summer (n = 23) and winter (n = 20) concentrations of the measured
n-alkanes. Variability shown is one standard deviation of the average.

homohopanes were detected, the HHI ranged from 0.5—0.6, indi-
cating vehicle emissions as the source. This was expected as very
little coal and oil burning for domestic heating occurs in Brisbane
and this may explain why the other targeted hopanes were below
the detection limit of majority samples (See Fig. 2). The hopane
concentrations were observed to be higher at the schools sampled
in summer (S15—20, See Table 3 for selected hopanes) and is the
reverse of what was previously observed in Europe (Schnelle-Kreis
et al., 2005). This was likely to be to the lower emissions of hopanes
from coal burning as well as the observed increased contribution
from vehicle emissions at the schools sampled in summer. There-
fore, based on the hopanes detected the main source of fossil fuel
combustion at the schools was vehicle emissions.

3.3.3. Biomass burning tracers

A number of biomass burning tracer compounds were detected
in this study, and include the anhydrous sugars; levoglucosan,
galactosan, mannosan (Qadir et al., 2013; Robinson et al., 2006a;
Simoneit, 2002) and the resin acids DHAA and DHAA-ME (Rogge

1.2

 

1.0 4

0.85

0.6 4

0.45

Concentration (ng m°)

0.25

0.0 T T T T i

Ts Tm

 

 

 

AA tb

27b 29ab 29ba 30ab 30ba 31abS 31abR32abS 32abR:

Fig. 2. Average concentration of analyzed hopanes across all schools. Variability shown
is one standard deviation of the average. Note the following abbreviations used not
described in the text: Ts (18a(H)-22,29,30-trisnorneohopane), Tm (17a(H)-22,29,30-
trisnorhopane), 27b (17B(H)-22,29,30-trisnorhopane), 30ba (17$(H),21(H)-hopane),
32abS —(17a(H),21P(H)-22S-bishomohopane) and 32abR  (170(H),21B(H)-22R-
bishomohopane).

Page 5

162                                                                                  L.R. Crilley et al. / Environmental Pollution 191 (2014) 158e165


                                                                                         % of Species                  Concentration of species
                                                              1000                                                                                              100
                                                                      Biomass Burning                                                                           90
                                                              100                                                                                               80
                                                                10                                                                                              70
                                                                                                                                                                60
                                                                1                                                                                               50
                                                                                                                                                                40
                                                               0.1                                                                                              30
                                                              0.01                                                                                              20
                                                                                                                                                                10
                                                             0.001                                                                                              0




                                                              100                                                                                                100
                                                                     Cooking                                                                                     90
                                                                10                                                                                               80
                                                                                                                                                                 70
                                                                1                                                                                                60
                                                                                                                                                                 50
                                                               0.1                                                                                               40
                                                                                                                                                                 30
                          Concentration of Species, ng m-3




                                                                                                                                                                       % of Species total
                                                              0.01                                                                                               20
                                                                                                                                                                 10
                                                             0.001                                                                                               0



                                                             1000                                                                                               100
                                                                     Vehicle Emissions                                                                          90
                                                              100                                                                                               80
                                                                                                                                                                70
                                                              10                                                                                                60
                                                                                                                                                                50
                                                                1                                                                                               40
                                                                                                                                                                30
                                                              0.1                                                                                               20
                                                                                                                                                                10
                                                             0.01                                                                                               0




                                                             1000                                                                                                100
                                                                     Plant Wax                                                                                   90
                                                              100                                                                                                80
                                                                                                                                                                 70
                                                              10                                                                                                 60
                                                                                                                                                                 50
                                                                1                                                                                                40
                                                                                                                                                                 30
                                                              0.1                                                                                                20
                                                                                                                                                                 10
                                                             0.01                                                                                                0




Fig. 3. Source factor profiles from the positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis using EPA-PMF3.0 model. Bars represent mass concentration while the squares indicate the
percentage contribution.



et al., 1998). DHAA is also a constituent of vehicle tires, indicating                                                  All of these seasonal differences were statistically significant
the presence of another possible source at the schools (Rogge et al.,                                                   (p < 0.05). The higher concentrations of the biomass burning
1993b; Sheya, 2002). As levoglucosan was generally the most                                                             tracers, levoglucosan and mannosan in winter is expected in Bris-
abundant compound detected at most of the schools (Table 3), it                                                         bane due to the influence of prescribed burning of bushland sur-
indicates that biomass burning was a significant source. Schools                                                         rounding the city during the winter to reduce the risk of summer
sampled in the summer generally had a lower concentration than                                                          bushfires. Prescribed burning typically occurs during JulyeAugust,
the schools sampled in winter, with the averages of 27.6  22.4 and                                                     which was when the highest concentration of levoglucosan and
94.6  60.3 ng m3 for summer and winter, respectively. By com-                                                         mannosan were observed (Table 3). The levoglucosan detected at
parison, using the same analytical technique, the mean levogluco-                                                       the schools sampled in the summer are likely to be from a different
san concentrations were higher in Augsburg, Germany compared to                                                         wood burning source as unlike at the schools sampled in winter
the current study at 112  84 and 337  174 ng m3 for summer and                                                       (Table 3), these schools recorded concentrations of DHAA above the
winter, respectively (Pietrogrande et al., 2011). The lower concen-                                                     detection limit. DHAA is emitted only from softwood combustion
trations in the current study are likely to be due to the warmer                                                        (specifically pine) unlike levoglucosan that is emitted by combus-
climate in Brisbane and the resulting low levels of domestic wood                                                       tion of all forms of cellulose containing materials (Pietrogrande
burning for heating.                                                                                                    et al., 2011; Robinson et al., 2006a; Rogge et al., 1998). This sug-
   Distinct seasonal trends were observed between the schools                                                           gests that in the summer there is a different source of biomass
sampled in summer and winter in the concentrations and distri-                                                          burning, possibly related to domestic wood burning such as from
butions of the biomass burning tracers. Schools sampled in winter                                                       barbeques, which in Brisbane predominantly use pine. In the pre-
recorded higher concentrations of levoglucosan and mannosan,                                                            vious section, higher contributions from vehicle emission at schools
compared to schools sampled in summer, whereas the schools                                                              sampled in summer were observed and another possible source of
sampled in summer had higher concentrations of DHAA (Table 3).                                                          DHAA is tire wear (Rogge et al., 1993b; Sheya, 2002). Thus, traffic

Page 6

                                                                                    L.R. Crilley et al. / Environmental Pollution 191 (2014) 158e165                                      163


emissions may have been a contributing source to the observed                                                          Fig. 4) recorded high traffic counts. Unlike the other schools, which
levels of DHAA at the schools along with domestic wood burning                                                         were in suburban areas, S18 is in an inner-city location and this may
barbeques.                                                                                                             explain the high levels for this factor.
                                                                                                                           The first factor was assigned to biomass burning as it was
                                                                                                                       characterized by high contributions of levoglucosan, the molecular
3.4. Source apportionment using PMF
                                                                                                                       marker for biomass burning (Qadir et al., 2013; Robinson et al.,
                                                                                                                       2006a; Simoneit, 2002). The OC/EC ratio for this factor was 2.8,
    To apportion the contributions of the different sources of pri-
                                                                                                                       which is lower than the ratio of OC/EC from previous study held in
mary organic aerosols identified at each school to the OC fraction,
                                                                                                                       Australia (Keywood et al., 2011). However, this could be explained
PMF was applied to the dataset. Interpretability was the key basis
                                                                                                                       by higher contribution of EC, which is a marker for vehicle emis-
for judging the optimum solution to the PMF analysis. Interpretable
                                                                                                                       sions (Sonntag et al., 2012), to the PMF profile. The biomass burning
solutions were those that grouped source-class-specific sets of
                                                                                                                       factor was the second largest source overall during the study, ac-
markers into distinct factors. Models that grouped markers for
                                                                                                                       counting for 29  23% of the OC (Fig. 4). From Fig. 4, the highest
multiple source classes into the same factor, distributed markers for
                                                                                                                       contributions were as expected, found during the winter (e.g. S22,
one source class across multiple factors, or contained factors with
                                                                                                                       S24 and S25) at an average of 48  19%, primarily due to the
no distinctive groupings of compounds were judged less inter-
                                                                                                                       practice of prescribed burning of bushland surrounding Brisbane.
pretable and rejected. While no molecular marker pattern can be
                                                                                                                           The next source, which accounted for 16  13% of the OC was
unambiguously associated with a specific source class, this
                                                                                                                       characterized by cholesterol. As cholesterol is a known tracer for
approach provides a systematic basis for sorting through the
                                                                                                                       meat cooking (Kleeman et al., 2008), this source was assigned to
possible PMF models (Shrivastava et al., 2007). Solutions with 3e5
                                                                                                                       meat cooking emissions. Cooking emissions are increasingly being
factors were investigated and the three factor solution was rejected
                                                                                                                       identified as a significant urban source (Mohr et al., 2012; Robinson
as it could not separate out the cooking and biomass burning fac-
                                                                                                                       et al., 2006b) and the observed high contributions may be indica-
tors. The five factor solution was not used due to splitting of the
                                                                                                                       tive of localized emissions from school canteens. This is illustrated
vehicle emissions source factor into unrealistic factors. Therefore
                                                                                                                       at S24 where the high concentrations (Fig. 4) were likely due to a
the four factor solution was found to best represent the data as it
                                                                                                                       school barbeque event that occurred on one of the sampling days.
gave realistic source profiles related to distinct primary sources.
                                                                                                                       In addition, S23 had high concentration of meat cooking emissions
Source profiles are given in Fig. 3 and were assigned to biomass
                                                                                                                       because it is located near a large number of restaurants. This
burning, cooking, vehicle and plant wax emissions based upon the
                                                                                                                       probably suggests that apart from the school canteen, there was an
high concentrations of known tracer molecules for these sources.
                                                                                                                       additional source at the school.
The contributions of each identified source factors to the OC
                                                                                                                           High contributions of the alkanes C25, C27 and C29 e C31 char-
measured at each individual school are given in Fig. 4 and the
                                                                                                                       acterized the last factor, which was assigned to plant waxes. Plant
factors will be discussed in order of their contribution to the OC
                                                                                                                       waxes particles can enter the atmosphere from either leaf abrasion
rather than factor number.
                                                                                                                       (Rogge et al., 1993c) or incomplete biomass burning (Simoneit,
    The major source, vehicle emissions (See Fig. 4), was charac-
                                                                                                                       2002). Both of these source pathways were likely as the highest
terized by the C20-25 alkanes and the hopanes 29ab, 30ab, 31abS
                                                                                                                       contributions were observed at schools (S20, S21 and S22) sampled
and 31abR. C20 and C23e5 alkanes have previously been shown to be
                                                                                                                       during the driest time of the year and schools that recorded strong
associated with diesel and gasoline vehicle emissions (Rogge et al.,
                                                                                                                       biomass burning influences (Fig. 4). This factor accounted for 7  6%
1993a). This together with the fact that the hopanes determined in
                                                                                                                       of the OC and was the smallest contributing source of primary
Section 3.3.2 were deemed to be from fossil fuel combustion, points
                                                                                                                       aerosols at the schools.
to vehicle emissions as the source. The HHI for this factor was 0.85
                                                                                                                           As the schools selected for this study were not close to any other
and in the range expected for vehicle emissions, further indicating
                                                                                                                       large source of air pollution other than road traffic, the main source
vehicle emissions as a source. This factor contributed an average of
                                                                                                                       of primary organic aerosol was hypothesized to be vehicle emis-
45  30% of the OC at the schools and was therefore the main
                                                                                                                       sions. This hypothesis was confirmed based upon the PMF analysis
source in our study. The factor was only somewhat correlated with
                                                                                                                       on selected tracer organic molecules (Fig. 4). The lower contribu-
the traffic counts beside the schools (r2 of 0.3), probably due to the
                                                                                                                       tion from biomass burning source to OC mass at S15eS20 (sites
multiple variables that contribute to the observed levels of vehicle
                                                                                                                       measured in summer, Fig. 4) was due, in part, to the sampling at
emissions at the schools (Crilley, 2013). However, it was observed
                                                                                                                       these schools occurring when the contributions of biomass burning
that with the exception of S18 (Table 2), the schools with the
                                                                                                                       from prescribed burning were at a minimum. Generally, year-round
highest contributions from vehicle emissions (S15, S17, S19 and S20,
                                                                                                                       vehicle emissions were found to have a largest overall contribution
                                                                                                                       to the OC mass at the schools. Previous work on PM2.5 in urban
                             100%                                                                                      environments using an organic molecular marker approach also
                             90%                                                                                       found that vehicle emissions rather than wood combustion were
                                                                                                       Biomass
                             80%                                                                       Burning         the largest primary source of PM2.5 (Green et al., 2013; Wang et al.,
% Organic Carbon (OC) mass




                             70%
                                                                                                                       2012). Unlike in the current work where prescribed fires in sur-
                                                                                                       Cooking
                                                                                                                       rounding bushland were the source of biomass burning, the wood
                             60%
                                                                                                                       combustion was attributed primarily to residential heating in those
                             50%
                                                                                                       Vehicle         studies (Green et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2012).
                             40%                                                                       Emissions

                             30%
                                                                                                       Plant Wax       4. Conclusions
                             20%
                             10%                                                                                          Selected organic molecular markers were quantified in order to
                              0%                                                                                       apportion the contributing sources of primary organic aerosols to
                                    S15   S16   S17   S18   S19   S20   S21   S22   S23   S24   S25
                                                                                                                       children’s exposure of PM2.5 at urban schools, with vehicle emis-
Fig. 4. Percentage of contributions of the PMF source factors to organic carbon (OC)                                   sions hypothesized to be the largest contributing source. Using
mass at the 11 schools.                                                                                                PMF, four source factors were identified and assigned to vehicle

Page 7

164                                             L.R. Crilley et al. / Environmental Pollution 191 (2014) 158e165


emissions, biomass burning, meat cooking and plant wax emis-                       References
sions. Vehicle emissions, which were characterized by C20-25 al-
kanes and the observed hopanes accounted for 45  30% of the                       Brown, S.G., Herckes, P., Ashbaugh, L., Hannigan, M.P., Kreidenweis, S.M.,
                                                                                        Collett Jr., J.L., 2002. Characterization of organic aerosol in Big Bend National
overall OC, with schools having the highest traffic counts recording                     Park, Texas. Atmos. Environ. 36, 5807e5818.
higher contributions. Biomass burning recorded high contribution                   Cass, G.R., 1998. Organic molecular tracers for particulate air pollution sources. TrAC
to the OC at an average of 29  23% and a seasonal trend that                           Trends Anal. Chem. 17, 356e366.
                                                                                   Chow, J.C., Watson, J.G., Crow, D., Lowenthal, D.H., Merrifield, T., 2001. Comparison
peaked in winter (48  19%) due to prescribed burning in bushland                       of IMPROVE and NIOSH carbon measurements. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 34, 23e34.
around Brisbane was also observed. For the same reasons, plant                     Crilley, L.R., 2013. Investigations of the Physical and Chemical Properties of Ambient
wax alkanes demonstrated a similar seasonal trend, though this                          Fine Particles in Urban Schools (PhD thesis). Faculty of Science and Engineering.
                                                                                        Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.
source only accounted for a small fraction (7  6%) of the OC.                     Gehring, U., Wijga, A., Brauer, M., Fischer, P., de Jongste, J., Kerkhof, M.,
Cooking emissions accounted for 16  13% of the OC, with a school                       Oldenwening, M., Smit, H., Brunekreef, B., 2010. Traffic-related air pollution and
nearby a restaurant precinct recording high contributions. There-                       the development of asthma and allergies during the first 8 years of life. Am. J.
                                                                                        Respir. Crit. Care Med. 181, 596e603.
fore, based upon the targeted organic molecular markers, vehicle
                                                                                   Goldstein, A.H., Galbally, I.E., 2007. Known and unexplored organic constituents in
emissions were the major source of organic aerosols at the schools                      the Earth’s atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 1514e1521.
studied, confirming the hypothesis. The second largest contribution                 Green, M.C., Chow, J.C., Chang, M.C.O., Chen, L.W.A., Kuhns, H.D., Etyemezian, V.R.,
                                                                                        Watson, J.G., 2013. Source apportionment of atmospheric particulate carbon in
was from a more regional source, in this case biomass burning as a
                                                                                        Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. Particuology 11, 110e118.
result of controlled burning of bushland surrounding Brisbane to                   Heal, M.R., Kumar, P., Harrison, R.M., 2012. Particles, air quality, policy and health.
reduce the risk of summer bushfires.                                                     Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 6606e6630.
    Controlled burning of bushland is common practice near urban                   Jimenez, J.L., Canagaratna, M.R., Donahue, N.M., Prevot, A.S.H., Zhang, Q., Kroll, J.H.,
                                                                                        DeCarlo, P.F., Allan, J.D., Coe, H., Ng, N.L., Aiken, A.C., Docherty, K.S., Ulbrich, I.M.,
areas in Australia as well as in other countries that are affected by                   Grieshop, A.P., Robinson, A.L., Duplissy, J., Smith, J.D., Wilson, K.R., Lanz, V.A.,
wild bush or forest fires such as the U.S.A and Mediterranean                            Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J.,
countries. Thus the significant influence of biomass burning from                         Vaattovaara, P., ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J., Collins, D.R., Cubison, M.J.,
                                                                                        Dunlea, E.J., Huffman, A., Onasch, T.B., Alfarra, M.R., Williams, P.I., Bower, K.N.,
both controlled and wild fires that was observed in the results from                     Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K.L.,
this study is potentially applicable to other urban areas in Australia                  Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S.,
and other countries. Another notable aspect of the results was the                      Jayne, J.T., Herndon, S.C., Trimborn, A., Williams, L.R., Wood, E.C.,
                                                                                        Middlebrook, A., Kolb, C.E., Baltensperger, U., Worsnop, D.R., 2009. Evolution of
large contribution from meat cooking emissions, possibly due to                         organic aerosols in the atmosphere science. Science 326 (5959), 1525e1529.
activities at the schools. This result warrants further investigations             Keywood, M., Guyes, H., Selleck, P., Gillett, R., 2011. Quantification of secondary
to determine the full impact of meat cooking emissions at schools.                      organic aerosol in an Australian urban location. Environ. Chem. 8, 115e126.
                                                                                   Kleeman, M.J., Robert, M.A., Riddle, S.G., Fine, P.M., Hays, M.D., Schauer, J.J.,
Finally, although vehicle emissions were identified as a major source
                                                                                        Hannigan, M.P., 2008. Size distribution of trace organic species emitted from
in this study, it is not necessarily the only major source of pollution                 biomass combustion and meat charbroiling. Atmos. Environ. 42, 3059e3075.
in urban areas, as only a subset of organic compounds were analyzed                Mejía, J.F., Choy, S.L., Mengersen, K., Morawska, L., 2011. Methodology for assessing
                                                                                        exposure and impacts of air pollutants in school children: data collection,
in this work. Overall, the results from this study point to the influ-
                                                                                        analysis and health effects e a literature review. Atmos. Environ. 45, 813e823.
ence of both local (traffic) and regional (biomass burning) sources of              Mohr, C., DeCarlo, P.F., Heringa, M.F., Chirico, R., Slowik, J.G., Richter, R., Reche, C.,
primary organic aerosols on the levels of ambient particles that                        Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Seco, R., Peñuelas, J., Jiménez, J.L., Crippa, M.,
children are exposed at schools. This has implications for potential                    Zimmermann, R., Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A.S.H., 2012. Identification and
                                                                                        quantification of organic aerosol from cooking and other sources in Barcelona
control measures for mitigating exposure at schools, as contribu-                       using aerosol mass spectrometer data. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 1649e1665.
tions from regional biomass burning events can at certain times                    Orasche, J., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Abbaszade, G., Zimmermann, R., 2011. In-situ deriva-
surpass those of local traffic emissions. Therefore, while efforts to                    tization thermal desorption GC-TOFMS for direct analysis of particle-bound
                                                                                        non-polar and polar organic species. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 8977e8993.
reduce the levels of primary organic aerosols could focus on                       Oros, D.R., Simoneit, B.R.T., 2000. Identification and emission rates of molecular
reducing local traffic emissions at schools, consideration should also                   tracers in coal smoke particulate matter. Fuel 79, 515e536.
be given to regional biomass burning sources, particularly in loca-                Paatero, P., Tapper, U., 1994. Positive matrix factorization: a non-negative factor
                                                                                        model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values. Environmetrics
tions affected by wild and controlled fires.                                             5, 111e126.
                                                                                   Pietrogrande, M.C., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Bacco, D., Mercuriali, M.,
                                                                                        Zimmermann, R., 2011. Seasonal variation and source estimation of organic
Acknowledgments                                                                         compounds in urban aerosol of Augsburg, Germany. Environ. Pollut. 159, 1861e
                                                                                        1868.
                                                                                   Qadir, R.M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Chow, J.C., Zimmermann, R., 2013.
    This work was supported by the Australian Research Council
                                                                                        Concentrations and source contributions of particulate organic matter before
(ARC), QLD Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR) and                            and after implementation of a low emission zone in Munich, Germany. Environ.
QLD Department of Education, Training and Employment (DETE)                             Pollut. 175, 158e167.
through Linkage Grant LP0990134. Our particular thanks go to R.                    Robinson, A.L., Subramanian, R., Donahue, N.M., Bernardo-Bricker, A., Rogge, W.F.,
                                                                                        2006a. Source apportionment of molecular markers and organic aerosol. 2.
Fletcher (DTMR) and B. Robertson (DETE) for their vision regarding                      Biomass smoke. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 7811e7819.
the importance of this work. We would also like to thank Prof G.                   Robinson, A.L., Subramanian, R., Donahue, N.M., Bernardo-Bricker, A., Rogge, W.F.,
Marks, Dr P. Robinson, Prof K. Mengersen, Prof Z. Ristovski, Dr. M.                     2006b. Source apportionment of molecular markers and organic aerosol. 3.
                                                                                        Food cooking emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 7820e7827.
Mazaheri, Dr C. He, Dr G. Johnson, Dr R. Jayaratne, Dr S. Low Choy,                Rogge, W.F., Hildemann, L.M., Mazurek, M.A., Cass, G.R., 1998. Sources of fine
Prof G. Williams, W. Ezz, F. Salimi, S. Clifford, M. Mokhtar, N. Mishra,                organic aerosol. 9. Pine, oak, and synthetic log combustion in residential fire-
R. Laiman, L. Guo, Prof C. Duchaine, Dr H. Salonen, Dr X. Ling, Dr J.                   places. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 13e22.
                                                                                   Rogge, W.F., Hildemann, L.M., Mazurek, M.A., Cass, G.R., Simoneit, B.R.T., 1993a.
Davies, Dr L. Leontjew Toms, F. Fuoco, Dr A. Cortes, Dr B. Toelle, A.                   Sources of fine organic aerosol. 2. Noncatalyst and catalyst-equipped automo-
Quinones, P. Kidd, E. Belousova, Dr M. Falk, Dr F. Fatokun, Dr J. Mejia,                biles and heavy-duty diesel trucks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27, 636e651.
Dr D. Keogh, Prof T. Salthammer, R. Appleby and C. Labbe for their                 Rogge, W.F., Hildemann, L.M., Mazurek, M.A., Cass, G.R., Simoneit, B.R.T., 1993b.
                                                                                        Sources of fine organic aerosol. 3. Road dust, tire debris, and organometallic brake
contribution to the UPTECH project.                                                     lining dust: roads as sources and sinks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27, 1892e1904.
                                                                                   Rogge, W.F., Hildemann, L.M., Mazurek, M.A., Cass, G.R., Simoneit, B.R.T., 1993c.
                                                                                        Sources of fine organic aerosol. 4. Particulate abrasion products from leaf sur-
Appendix A. Supplementary data                                                          faces of urban plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27, 2700e2711.
                                                                                   Rückerl, R., Schneider, A., Breitner, S., Cyrys, J., Peters, A., 2011. Health effects of
                                                                                        particulate air pollution: a review of epidemiological evidence. Inhal. Toxicol.
   Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http://
                                                                                        23, 555e592.
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.04.023.

Page 8

                                                           L.R. Crilley et al. / Environmental Pollution 191 (2014) 158e165                                                       165

Ryan, P.H., Bernstein, D.I., Lockey, J., Reponen, T., Levin, L., Grinshpun, S.,               Sheya, S.A., 2002. Development of Thermal Desorption gas Chromatography/mass
    Villareal, M., Khurana Hershey, G.K., Burkle, J., LeMasters, G., 2009. Exposure to            Spectrometry as a Rapid Method for Ambient Particulate Characterization.
    traffic-related particles and endotoxin during infancy is associated with                      Department of Materials Science and Engineering. University of Utah, USA.
    wheezing at age 3 years. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 180, 1068e1075.                   Shrivastava, M.K., Subramanian, R., Rogge, W.F., Robinson, A.L., 2007. Sources of
Schnelle-Kreis, J., Orasche, J., Abbaszade, G., Schäfer, K., Harlos, D., Hansen, A.A.,            organic aerosol: positive matrix factorization of molecular marker data and
    Zimmermann, R., 2011. Application of direct thermal desorption gas chroma-                    comparison of results from different source apportionment models. Atmos.
    tography time-of-flight mass spectrometry for determination of nonpolar or-                    Environ. 41, 9353e9369.
    ganics in low-volume samples from ambient particulate matter and personal                 Simoneit, B.R.T., 2002. Biomass burning d a review of organic tracers for smoke
    samplers. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 401, 3083e3094.                                                from incomplete combustion. Appl. Geochem. 17, 129e162.
Schnelle-Kreis, J., Sklorz, M., Orasche, J., Stölzel, M., Peters, A., Zimmermann, R.,         Sonntag, D.B., Bailey, C.R., Fulper, C.R., Baldauf, R.W., 2012. Contribution of lubri-
    2007. Semi volatile organic compounds in ambient PM2.5. Seasonal trends and                   cating oil to particulate matter emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles in
    daily resolved source contributions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 3821e3828.                    Kansas city. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 4191e4199.
Schnelle-Kreis, J., Sklorz, M., Peters, A., Cyrys, J., Zimmermann, R., 2005. Analysis of      US-EPA, 2008. Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) 3.0 Fundamentals & User Guide,
    particle-associated semi-volatile aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons in urban                in: Research Triangle Park, N. (Ed.).
    particulate matter on a daily basis. Atmos. Environ. 39, 7702e7714.                       Wang, Y., Hopke, P.K., Xia, X., Rattigan, O.V., Chalupa, D.C., Utell, M.J., 2012. Source
Seinfeld, J.H., Pandis, S.N., 2006. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: from Air                   apportionment of airborne particulate matter using inorganic and organic
    Pollution to Climate Change, second ed. John Wiley and Sons.                                  species as tracers. Atmos. Environ. 55, 525e532.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.