Original source · versioned page text
2018-08-07 P&E Agenda - Attachment 1 to Item 3 - Noosa Biosphere Reserve 10 Year Periodic Review
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Noosa Biosphere Reserve - Periodic Review 2018
A number of peer-reviewed reports, studies and surveys have to be considered to gain a
comprehensive understanding of the overall biodiversity status of the NBR. The most recent study was
the NBAR which utilises a number of data sets and information sources to build a spatial map of
biodiversity scoring based on:
• Conservation status
• Under-represented REs
• Presence of significant species
• Stream order condition
• Wetlands classifications
• Threatened Ecological Communities, and
• Vegetation connectivity.
Other reports, studies and surveys also add value to information contained in the NBAR, including:
• Noosa Waterways Assessment report
• Noosa Fish Passage Study
• The Reefcheck Australia annual reports on nearshore reefs
• Species lists gathered by local interest groups (NPA Bird Observers Group, Botany Group)
• Wallum Aquatic Fauna (Dr Tim Howell), and
• Specific advice from experts on frogs, birds, reptiles and mammals.
The change in conservation status of the various REs within the NBR was fully documented in the
NBAR, 2016 (pp96-104) as summarised in Table 10.
3.3 Biodiversity involved in the provision of ecosystems services
Table 10 below summarises the biodiversity elements involved in the provision of ecosystem services
and also lists the changes to these indicators that have happened over the past decade.
Table 10: Biodiversity ecosystem services and changes, NBR
INDICATOR - NBR 2007 2018 COMMENTS ECOSYSTEM
SUBMISSION PR REPORT SERVICE
Total area – 40,611 ha 40,265 122ha lost to urban Water quality,
remnant development and clearing tourism, recreation,
vegetation for agriculture; flood mitigation, soil
224ha change due to conservation,
improved vegetation nutrient cycling,
mapping. visual, spiritual
Total change: -346ha
% remnant 50.6% 46.8% As for row 1 above As above
vegetation
% regrowth 7.6% 7.8% Improved vegetation Water quality, flood
vegetation mapping and additional mitigation, soil
regrowth. conservation,
nutrient cycling,
visual
Total no. of REs 60 61 Updated RE mapping
Total REs - 10 8 Upgrade of two Water quality, flood
Endangered ‘Endangered’ REs to ‘Of mitigation, soil
Concern’ and 1 mapped conservation,
RE removed through nutrient cycling,
improved mapping. visual, spiritual
Total area - 5,449 ha 4,317 ha As above As above
Endangered
% remnant 13.4% 11% As above As above
vegetation – RE
Endangered
Total REs – Of 24 24 Some REs up-graded, Water quality, flood
Concern some downgraded, total mitigation, soil
number of REs is the conservation,
same. nutrient cycling,
visual, spiritual
Page 35
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.