Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Council archive · source document

Development Assessment Report (002) · 51987.44.01

of 13

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Table 10.3 of the resolution identifies the applicable Council charge rate for both
Entertainment and Dining Business Type 1 Food and Beverages and Retail Business
Type 2 Shop & Salon to be $184.45/m2 of GFA and an additional $10 per m2 of
impervious area over the site.

The proposed extensions incorporate a total additional gross floor area of 56m2 and
no additional impervious area.

The total infrastructure charges applying to the extension would therefore equate to
$10,329.20 + Indexation.



7. PLANNNING SCHEME

As this request is for an ‘other change’, the application is required to have regard to
the current Assessment Benchmarks that apply to development, which include:
    • Noosaville Locality Code
    • Business Uses Code
    • Landscaping Code
    • Driveway and Carparking Code
    • Natural Hazards Overlay Code (Flood Hazard Areas & Acid Sulfate Soil Areas)

Table 1 below provides an assessment of the proposal against the other applicable
codes:

Table 1 – Code Compliance Table (other applicable codes)

Applicable Code             Comment
Noosaville Locality Code    The proposed development is contained within the
                            footprint of an existing building and does not raise any
                            issues with the outcomes contained within Noosa
                            Noosaville Locality Code.

                            The proposed renovations will incorporate a mix of
                            lightweight and textured building materials and create a
                            vibrant active frontage that will compliment the
                            character of Noosaville and integrate with surrounding
                            buildings.
Business Uses Code          The proposed extensions and uses do not raise any issues
                            against the outcomes contained within the Business Uses
                            Code.

                            The proposal incorporates the refurbishment and
                            extension of an existing street awning. As illustrated on
                            the architectural plans, the design will be aesthetically
                            pleasing and in keeping with the existing streetscape
                            character of Thomas street, as sought by O36 of the
                            code.
Landscaping Code            The proposed changes will not impact on the existing
                                                                           Page 11 of 13

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.8 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Development Assessment Report (002).pdf · 2.8 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.