Meeting minutes

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                          20 JUNE 2024


            parklike, vegetated setting envisaged for the centre which is synonymous with the
            Noosa style.
            3. The proposal is not consistent with acceptable and performance outcomes
            AO5, PO5, AO7.4, PO7 of the Noosaville Local Plan Code a:
            a. The development does not retain or propose to enhance the required 10m wide
            landscaped garden bed to Hofmann Drive which is important to contribute and
            create the character sought for the Noosa Business Centre.
            4. The proposal is not consistent with the overall outcome (3)(f) and (4) acceptable
            and performance outcomes AO32.4, AO32.5, AO32.6, PO32 and PO33 of the
            Major Centre Zone as:
            a. Reducing the width of the landscaped garden beds required to Hofmann Drive,
            particularly where this approach is continued for the remainder of the lots with
            frontage to Hofmann Drive, will compromise and impact the ability to achieve a
            centre which is overall recognisable as having a Noosa style.
            b. The proposal does not retain, incorporate, or enhance the existing vegetation
            within the required 10m wide landscaped garden bed to Hofmann Drive, which is
            important to enhance the visual amenity and natural landscape character of the
            Noosa Business Centre.
            c. The proposal disrupts the landscaped streetscape treatment required to
            Hofmann Drive intended to enhance the amenity and contribute positively to the
            centre’s character.
            d. The proposed use is an inconsistent use in the Major Centre Zone Code –
            Business Park Precinct will not deliver the commercial and employment uses
            intended for the Precinct such as health and wellbeing, education, research and
            technology and knowledge-based industries.
            e. The bio retention basin at the front of the site is located within the required
            setback area and in front of the proposed carparking area which results in the
            development being more visible to the road and not located in a park like setting.
            5. The proposal is not consistent with overall outcome 2(a), (d) and performance
            outcome PO8 of the Sustainable Building Design Code as the development does
            not provide a minimum floor to ceiling height of 2.7m.
            6. The proposed bicycle parking is not consistent with acceptable outcomes AO6.1
            of the Driveways and Parking Code as they are located in an area that impedes
            access around the site.
            B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning
            Act 2016.
            C. Request staff to undertake action to ensure the landscaping across the frontage
            of the site is consistent with development approvals RAL18/0023 and
            OPW20/0145.
            For:        Crs Wilkie, Stockwell, Wegener, Finzel and Wilson
            Against: Crs Phillips and Lorentson
            Carried.


            5.4. FURTHER REPORT - MCU21/0110 - APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL
            CHANGE OF USE - RESORT COMPLEX AND ANCILLARY BAR, FOOD AND
            DRINK OUTLET, OUTDOOR SPORT AND RECREATION, AND CLUB (MINOR
            EXTENSION TO EXISTING CLUBHOUSE) AT 61 NOOSA SPRINGS DRIVE,
            NOOSA HEADS

            In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Finzel
            provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of interest
            in this matter:
            I, Cr Finzel, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this
            matter as I have come to understand that JFP Urban Consultants on behalf of
            Altum Property Group, who are the Developers of Park Ridge Noosa Springs,