Council archive · source document
MCU12/0023 Development Application Part 2 of 2 Town Planning Report
commercial building. Proposed materials/finishes for the juliette
balconies include:
• rendered and painted nib walls;
• balustrades to be a mixture of aluminium blade and angle
vertical elements with a powdercoat finish. The handrails,
although vertical for compliance requirements, will be
similar to the horizontal sunscreen components of the
approved building;
n colours to be in muted tones and hues in keeping with the
existing landscape and vegetation.
d) Visitor accommodation is energy and water efficient. This criteria is not relevant to the current proposal for juliette
balconies.
e) Visitor accommodation is compatible with surrounding land This criteria is not relevant to the current proposal for juliette
uses. balconies.
f) Visitor accommodation is suitable to the needs of visitors and This criteria is not relevant to the current proposal for juliette
is accessible to services and facilities or valued features within balconies.
the Shire.
5.4 REFERRAL. AGENCY ISSUES
In accordance with Schedule 7 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, the proposed development triggers referral
to the Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) for the following matters:
n All or part of the premises is in an area for which an area management advice has been given for
unexploded ordnance (UXO) - Concurrence Agency
n Part of the land is within 100m of a conservation estate under the Nature Conservation Act 1992 - Advice
Agency
n Part of the land is situated in a wetland management area - Advice Agency
The application for Extension to Restaurant (to include outdoor dining) and Extension to Visitor Accommodation
(to include juliette balconies) has been assessed against the relevant provisions of the Noosa Plan and is found to
be generally compliant.
The key issues arising from the assessment are design/character and noise impacts. These matters have been
addressed in detail in this report and within the Noise Amenity Review in Appendix B of this report.
Based on this assessment, it is recommended that the proposal be approved, subject to reasonable and relevant
conditions.
PLANNING REPORT - Revision A 215A - 219 David Low Way, Peregian Beach
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU12/0023 Development Application Part 2 of 2 Town Planning ReportRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 8.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.