Council archive · source document
Letter to Council · MCU13/0171
Attached to the e-mail Properly made submission (object) Ann Jackson MCU13/0171.
RE: Application No. MCU 13/0171 375 Lake Macdonald Drive Lake Macdonald 4563 22/10/2013 The Assessment Manager Sunshine Coast Regional Council. Dear Sir/Madam I hereby lodge my objection to the above Application on the following grounds. 1. As this will affect for many years into the future, this MCU should rightly be assessed by the incoming Noosa Shire Council. It is therefore outside the jurisdiction of the existing, and soon to be defunct, Sunshine Coast Regional Council as it is now in Caretaker status and major decisions such as this can result in lengthy expensive court challenges. That would be detrimental to the rate payers and possibly leave the current council open to large legal and compensation payouts. 2. Historically Cooroy had industrial activities saw mills, butter factory, brick works, transport depots, scattered throughout the residential areas. Good Town Planning however acknowledges that industrial activity should be in separate designated areas to provide amenity to those residential lifestyles. Large areas of land have been set aside, already sub-divided, appropriately zoned, and facilities in place at tax payers expense for such industrial activities as described in the proposal. This is a proposed move of a “back to the future” idea. Because less strychnine is better than a lot of strychnine does not justify small doses. The same with traffic flows. Point (2) 3. The cessation of the vehicular traffic from the clay trucks has been a boon for residential amenity. To reintroduce 24 hour truck and vehicle traffic on a road that services residential and quiet recreational use is unsatisfactory. Safety issues for cyclists, school children on bikes, walkers, horse riders and current residential road users will be exacerbated. The existing road is barely capable and most unsuitable for the traffic it now carries. Its width, topography and base that potholes after every decent downpour is grossly unsuitable for a renewal of commercial vehicular traffic and maintenance will incur a heavy cost penalty to the new Council and ratepayers. 4. The future intentions alluded to in the MCU and specified in Point (6) simply reinforces the negative aspects of increased vehicular flows further out along Lake Macdonald Drive. The same road design flaws will simply
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
become more apparent as will the disruption to eco-friendly activities associated with the Noosa Trails. The “thin end of the wedge” from a well resourced developer who chooses not to use already correctly zoned industrial land that has been provided at public expense. This application is thumbing its nose at Council and State Government Planning Directives and principles. 5. In regard extra employment to the district that is most certainly a worthwhile outcome but even more employment could be created if a purpose built facility were to be created on existing zoned industrial land and the brick works site be developed over time as a residential home sites where appropriate. 6. To suggest community participation would have any effect on a developers future plans is naive and insulting to the intelligence of citizens unless a caveat be registered requiring identified community organizations to be consulted and those opinions to have weight in future negotiations. (Eg)The RSL, Salvation Army, Chamber of Commerce, Cooroy Tennis Club, Genealogical Society etc. point (7) 7. According to advice from SEQwater, the future of the Lake Macdonald reservoir is under review. That outcome should be known and residents advised prior to any decision that involves its future possible importance to this MCU as suggested in Point (6) Thank you for providing this opportunity to be involved in future directions Yours faithfully fA. Ann Jackson.
Used in these records
Letter to Council.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 184 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.