Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Original source · versioned page text

3018AppendixC

Attached to the e-mail RAL21/0018 - Information Request Response - 130 Lake Macdonald Drive Cooroy (Email 3 of 3).

of 34

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (15.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

                                                                                                  51 640 311 842
                                                                                                      CONTACT
                                                                                     [email protected]
                                                                                              arcosgroup.com.au
                                                                                                        OFFICES
                                                                          Sunshine Coast | Brisbane | Gold Coast




reduce such risk is usually not required unless reasonably practicable measures are available at low
cost in terms of money, time and effort.”.

AGS suggest that regulators generally accept risk levels of “low” or lower as a level of
acceptable risk.

AGS prepared a semi-quantitative assessment tool for determining the level of risk for a site.
The tool separates the potential hazards for a site, from a stability context, and rates them with
a level of risk frequency. The multiplication of these individual risk frequency summates as the
risk frequency rating which is then measured against the levels of risk nominated by AGS.


The results of this analysis are shown in Table 1.


Table 1: Results of AGS Qualitative Risk Assessment
               Hazard                          Likelihood      Consequence                Risk Level
            Global Failure                   Barely Credible   Catastrophic                    Low
     Shallow slumping or slide of               Unlikely          Minor                        Low
             surface soils
Based on the results of the AGS assessment, the perceived risk based on the conditions
encountered and information available at the time of the assessment is “Low”.

7.0 Hillside Construction
The following works should be implemented in addition to other items highlighted within this
document. These points are considered to be typical good hillside construction practice as
explained in attached documentation:

•   Foundations should be founded into stiff (or stronger) residual clay.
•   Where slopes are not supported by an engineer designed support system, natural slopes
    within or near building envelope or movement sensitive areas should be no steeper than
    2H:1V.
•   Building platform fill should be limited to a maximum height of 1 m. The filling should be
    step keyed into the natural slope and battered no steeper than 3H:1V unless an engineer
    designed retention system is in place.
•   Unsupported cuts steeper than 2.5H:1V will require engineer designed retention systems.
•   All stormwater and surface water is to be collected and discharged by an approved
    stormwater drainage system. The use of subsurface drainage systems are not suitable
    unless greater than 50 m downslope from the envelope at this site.
•   Ongoing maintenance of the effluent wastewater area is also considered mandatory. The
    location of the application area should be located below the proposed building. Plumbing
    and services must also not be allowed to leak and regular maintenance and inspections
    should be undertaken.

09 Dec 2021                                                    Proposed Subdivision and Residence
Log in to download the original file

3018AppendixC.pdf · 15.5 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.