Original source · versioned page text
MAYORAL MINUTES · 2026-07-16 Mayoral Minute - DRFA Funding
MAYORAL MINUTE
Author: Mayor Frank Wilkie
Attachments: Attachment 1 – Disaster Management Reform – Discussion
Paper – 6 July 2026 - IAW Section 254D(3) of the LG Regulation
2012 - this is not publicly available as it contains information that is
confidential to the local government
I hereby give notice of my intention to move the following motion at the Ordinary Meeting on
Thursday, 16 July 2026:
1 DISASTER RECOVERY FUNDING ARRANGEMENTS
That Council:
A. Note the receipt of the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) Disaster
Management Reform Discussion Paper regarding proposed changes to disaster funding
arrangements (provided at Attachment 1);
B. Delegate to the Mayor to sign the Queensland Government Disaster Funding Petition
initiated by the Minister for Local Government and Water, Minister for Fire, Disaster
Recovery and Volunteers, opposing the proposed changes to the Disaster Recovery
Funding Arrangements (DRFA);
C. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to prepare and submit a formal submission to the
National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) outlining Council’s concerns
regarding the proposed DRFA changes and the potential impacts on local governments,
communities, and disaster recovery outcomes across Queensland by the 19 August
2026 closing date, appropriately recognising Queensland's disaster risk profile and
support ongoing investment in recovery, resilience and betterment initiatives for local
communities;
D. Write to the Federal Member for Wide Bay and Queensland Senators seeking their
support to oppose the proposed DRFA changes and advocate for the retention of
equitable and sustainable recovery funding arrangements, highlighting the significant
financial burden the changes would place on councils and the potential reduction in
recovery and resilience outcomes for disaster-affected communities; and
E. Prepare a response to LGAQ outlining Council’s views for incorporation into a statewide
response by 10 August 2026.
BACKGROUND
National Emergency Management Australia have released the Disaster Management Reform
Discussion Paper following the Federal Government’s announcement last month of proposed
changes to Australia’s disaster recovery funding arrangements.
The proposed reforms would replace the current Disaster Recovery Funding Arrangements (DRFA)
with a flat 50:50 cost-sharing model between the Commonwealth and State Governments. While the
Commonwealth has stated that councils will not be directly impacted, modelling undertaken by the
Queensland Reconstruction Authority (QRA) indicates Queensland would be approximately $713
million worse off during the 2025–26 disaster season alone.
Queensland currently benefits from a safety-net mechanism that increases Commonwealth support
to a 75:25 funding split when disaster impacts exceed the State’s capacity to respond. Under the
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
proposed reforms, that safeguard would be removed, meaning Queensland would never receive
more than 50 per cent Commonwealth funding regardless of the scale or severity of the event.
These changes come at a time when disaster impacts and recovery costs are escalating rapidly.
Queensland’s disaster recovery expenditure increased from approximately $3 billion between 2016
and 2021 to $6 billion after 2021, with projected costs for the 2025–26 period estimated at $17 billion.
For Noosa Council, the impacts are tangible. Since the introduction of the current DRFA framework
in 2018, Council has received approximately $198.2 million in disaster recovery funding under all
categories. Under the proposed arrangements, this would have resulted in an additional cost burden
of around $27.7 million for the State / Council - a cost shift of approximately 22 per cent.
The impact to recovery of returning essential assets such as roads, drainage assets and waterway
crossings is concerning. Since 2021, Noosa has received funding to return these assets to functional
use at a value of $182 million. A shortfall of 22 per cent in future disasters is most concerning as it
will delay recovery and impact everyday life for residents and visitors to the shire.
The reforms would also significantly reduce support for resilience and betterment initiatives that
enable damaged infrastructure to be rebuilt stronger and more resilient to future disasters. Since
2018, Noosa has delivered three Betterment projects at a combined value of $4.9 million. The most
recent and most substantial being the realignment of the water main and bridge build at Schreibers
Road, ensuring water security for the entire region.
These programs have delivered substantial long-term benefits to the Noosa community by reducing
future disaster risk, improving resilience and ensuring better value for public investment.
In addition to infrastructure funding, the proposed reforms would affect several existing disaster
recovery programs. Since 2018, Noosa has accessed approximately $14.78 million in Category C
and Category D funding initiatives, including:
Bushfire Recovery Exceptional Assistance
Local Economic Recovery activities and assets
Extraordinary clean-up programs
Recovery and Resilience Grants
Recreation and Community Asset recovery programs
Voluntary Home Buy-Back programs
Flood studies, risk assessments, management studies and intelligence systems.
The reforms may also impact practical support provided during disasters, including evacuation
centres, sandbagging operations, emergency response activities and the rapid repair of roads and
essential infrastructure. Increased funding thresholds for smaller disaster events could also leave
some communities without support following localised disasters.
The proposed changes to Category C and Category D funding are highly concerning. While the
discussion paper suggests additional support may still be available in “genuinely extraordinary
circumstances”, it provides no clear definition of what constitutes such circumstances or how
assistance would be activated.
I am also concerned about proposals to standardise disaster recovery assistance nationally. It is
difficult to envisage how a one-size-fits-all approach could adequately address the diverse needs,
challenges and recovery priorities of communities across Australia.
These proposed changes fail to reflect the reality faced by disaster-prone regions such as Noosa
and Queensland more broadly. They risk reducing the resources available for recovery, resilience
and preparedness at a time when natural disasters are becoming more frequent, more severe and
more costly.
This past summer, 71 of Queensland's 77 local government areas were impacted by disasters,
including two cyclones and extensive flooding that affected much of the state over a five-month
period. The proposed reforms would place an unsustainable financial burden on state and local
governments and, ultimately, on the communities they serve.
Page 2 of 3
Page 3
In response to the proposed changes, the Queensland Government has launched a Disaster
Funding Petition calling on the Australian Government to retain the current Disaster Recovery
Funding Arrangements and maintain funding arrangements that recognise Queensland's significant
disaster exposure.
The petition forms part of a broader statewide advocacy campaign opposing the proposed reforms
and highlighting the significant financial burden they would place on Queensland communities, state
and local governments. Given Noosa Council's reliance on DRFA funding to restore critical
infrastructure, support community recovery and deliver resilience and betterment projects, it is
appropriate that Council support this initiative and publicly advocate for the retention of equitable
and sustainable disaster recovery funding arrangements.
The petition is available at: https://listen2qld.com/disaster-funding
Providing a submission in response to the Discussion Paper is critical to ensuring communities like
Noosa continue to receive the support they need to recover, rebuild and strengthen their resilience
in the face of increasing natural disaster impacts. Council should advocate strongly for a funding
framework that recognises Queensland's unique disaster exposure, maintains equitable
Commonwealth support, and enables local communities to recover quickly and effectively when
disaster strikes.
16 July 2026
..................................................................... .................................................................
Cr Frank Wilkie, Mayor Date
Page 3 of 3