Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Original source · versioned page text

Annexure B SDAP Coastal

Attached to the e-mail Planning report & IDAS Forms, Annexure A,B,D,E,F,G - Email 1 of 2 MCU17/0035.

of 16

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Performance outcomes                             Acceptable outcomes                                              Response      Comment
PO4 Development avoids the release of            AO4.1 Development that involves the manufacture or               N/A
hazardous materials as a result of a             storage of hazardous materials in bulk are designed to:
natural hazard event.                            (1) prevent the intrusion of waters from a defined storm
Editor’s note: Applications should:                   tide event into structures or facilities containing the
(1)   assess the risk of storm tide inundation        hazardous materials, or
      releasing or otherwise exposing            (2) ensure hazardous materials remain secured despite
      hazardous materials, including
                                                      inundation, including secure from the effects of
      appropriate emergency planning and
      contingency measures.                           hydrodynamic forcing associated with wave action or
                                                      flowing water.
(2)   applications are to be supported by a
      report certified by a Registered
      Professional Engineer of Queensland
      (RPEQ) that demonstrates this
      performance outcome will be achieved.

PO5 Natural processes and the                    AO5.1 Development in an erosion prone area within the                          Existing vegetation on site to be retained. Proposal involves
protective function of landforms and             coastal management district:                                                   removal of campsites within frontal dunes as well
vegetation are maintained in coastal             (1) maintains vegetation on coastal landforms where its                        revegetation and fencing of more sensitive areas of the site.
hazard areas.                                        removal or damage may:                                                     Proposed fencing and defined access points will improve
                                                                                                                                and protect the existing landform and vegetation in the area.
                                                     (a) destabilise the area and increase the potential
                                                          for erosion, or
                                                     (b) interrupt natural sediment trapping processes or
                                                          dune or land building processes
                                                 (2) maintains sediment volumes of dunes and near-shore
                                                     coastal landforms, or where a reduction in sediment
                                                     volumes cannot be avoided, increased risks to
                                                     development from coastal erosion are mitigated by
                                                     location, design, construction and operating
                                                     standards
                                                 (3) minimises the need for erosion control structures or
                                                     riverbank hardening through location, design and
                                                     construction standards
                                                 (4) maintains physical coastal processes outside the
                                                     development footprint for the development, including
                                                     longshore transport of sediment along the coast
                                                 (5) reduces the risk of shoreline erosion for areas
                                                     adjacent to the development footprint unless the
                                                     development is an erosion control structure
                                                 (6) reduces the risk of shoreline erosion for areas
                                                     adjacent to the development footprint to the
                                                     maximum extent feasible in the case of erosion
                                                     control structures.


State development assessment provisions                                          Module 10 — Coastal protection         10.1 Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
5 December 2016 V1.10                                                                                                                                                                   Page 3 of 15
Log in to download the original file

Annexure B SDAP Coastal.pdf · 116 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.