Original source · versioned page text
Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU23 0075 [As Published]
b. not unreasonably obstruct views or cause overlooking of private open space or
habitable areas of adjoining premises;
c. provide adequate distance from adjoining land uses;
d. preserve existing vegetation that will help buffer development;
e. allow for space and landscaping to be provided between buildings including
adequate area at ground level for landscaping with trees, shrubs, outdoor living
and utilities;
f. be consistent with the predominant character of the surrounding area; and
g. protect the natural character and avoid adverse impacts on ecologically important
areas such as national parks, waterways and wetlands.
The setback intrusion relates to the upper rear balcony, noting the rest of the building on both
levels exceeds the minimum 6 metre setback. The site has a 6.5 m wide road reserve at the rear
of the site, which separates the subject lot to lots at the rear. There is 14 metres between the rear
boundary and buildings to the rear.
The proposed reduced setback is considered to comply with PO12 of the code, as the proposed
setback does not create privacy concerns or obstruct views and there is adequate space for
landscaping. The road reserve is unformed and has significant mature vegetation that provides
adequate screening of the building. It is also consistent with other rear setbacks in the street.
The reduced setback of the upper balcony is supported.
Side setback
The eave of the building at the northern/eastern elevation encroaches at 1.7m in lieu of the
required 2 metres. The adjacent building is well setback off the common boundary with existing
mature vegetation between buildings. It is noted that this is the south/western elevation for the
adjoining property, and it is unlikely there will be amenity issues associated with the
encroachment. The reduced setback of the eaves is supported.
4. CONSULTATION
4.1. Referral Agencies
Not Applicable
4.2. Internal Council Referrals
The application was forwarded to the following internal Council officers for review and/or
comment:
• Development Engineer, Development Assessment
5. CONCLUSION & REASONS FOR DECISION
The proposed development generally complies with the requirements of the planning scheme
and does not raise any significant issues that cannot be addressed by reasonable and relevant
conditions. The application is therefore recommended for approval.
The report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
RECOMMENDATION
With regard to Application No MCU23/0075 for a Material Change of Use - Dwelling house
situated at 26 Ferguson St Sunshine Beach and described as Lot 299 RP 48111 & Lot 300 RP
48111, it is recommended the application be approved in accordance with the following details
for the Decision Notice:
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
Application No: MCU23/0075
Page 9 of 13
Document Set ID: 22489647
Version: 8, Version Date: 07/12/2023
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.