Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Council archive · source document

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submissions Object - Petition

of 27

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Code Objective                   Developer's Assessment               Objectors' Assessment

road system
                                                                      proposed access and egress point
                                                                      does impact adversely on the safety
                                                                      and operation of the Eumundi-Noosa
                                                                      Road.

014    Provision   is made for   014 Complies                         Does not Comply
pedestrian and vehicular         Can comply via condition             The Applicants response is
queues at conflict points;       where applicable.                    inconsistent and vague. The
                                                                      Development will significantly affect
                                                                      traffic on the Eumundi-Noosa Road,
                                                                      the roundabout outside the School
                                                                      and pedestrian children on the
                                                                      footpath entrance in the event of
                                                                      queuing to access the proposed
                                                                      Development. The Applicant has
                                                                      provided no objective analysis of the
                                                                      likely queuing frequency or extent.
                                                                      The Applicant's      response   is indicative

                                                                      of the fact that the Applicant has not
                                                                      conducted the required analysis and
                                                                      expects the Assessment Manager to
                                                                      determine     what   is appropriate,      which

                                                                      is unacceptable in the already
                                                                      challenging   circumstances.


017 Car parking areas are        017 Complies                         Does not Comply

 landscaped...                   Car parking areas have been          Cannot be compliant as they do not
                                 suitably landscaped.                  meet the requirements of the
                                                                       Landscaping Code Objective 028.


The Application does not comply in the areas outlined above and has completely failed to address
adequately the potential impacts on the adjoining School. At 6.2 of its Town Planning Report the
Applicant makes unfounded, unqualified and unsupported opinion as to the potential impacts on the
adjoining School. The assessment is neither comprehensive nor soundly validated for example:


  Applicants Response / Assertion                    Objectors'   Response

                                                     This is a statement     of fact without    justification     as to
      1. The proposed petrol store building is
         located more than 10m form the school       its relevance.

         boundary
                                                     10m is in effect too close to the School boundary to
                                                     ensure  the safety of the children attending the
                                                     School. We have demonstrated elsewhere      in this

                                                     document  that international and Australian    best




                                                                                                                        23

Used in these records

About this file

File size
9.6 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submissions Object - Petition.pdf · 9.6 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.