Original source · versioned page text
2020-05-18 General Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 18 MAY 2020 3. ASSESSMENT The applicant has requested an extension to the currency period to the development approval under section 86 of the Planning Act 2016. When assessing an extension application, Council “…may consider any matter that the assessment manager considers relevant, even if the matter was not relevant to assessing the development application.” MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE The Noosa Plan 2006 The application was approved on 13 October 2006 as an impact assessable application under the superseded 1990 Planning Scheme (5 December 1997 version) with regard given to the Transitional Planning Scheme at the time (later adopted as the current Noosa Plan 2006). There are a number of provisions under The Noosa Plan 2006 that the proposal does not comply with, including (but are not limited to) building height in storeys, setbacks, roof form (roof terrace) and engineering works. Building Height The proposed basement does not comply with the definition of a basement under The Noosa Plan, resulting in the development being 4 storeys. As such, the development does not comply with Specific Outcome O4 of the Eastern Beaches Locality Code, which allows a maximum of 3 storeys in this location. It is however noted that the development is consistent with the character of the street, with surrounding buildings being predominantly 3 and 4 storeys in height, as the area was predominantly developed prior to The Noosa Plan coming into effect – at a time when basements were only required to be in the ground by 1.2m to not count as a storey. The proposal, in terms of height, may be considered acceptable given the development complies with the maximum building height in metres, and would be consistent with development in proximity to the subject site in terms of perceived number of storeys. Setbacks The approved plans include a reduced setback of 2.5 metres at the third storey to the south western boundary, as opposed to the required minimum of 3 metres under the superseded planning scheme. The reduced setback was approved as the encroachment was along the common boundary with 7 Park Crescent, and it was considered that the design of the two duplexes worked in conjunction with each other in order to avoid any adverse impacts resulting from the reduced setback. Given the development at 7 Park Crescent has lapsed, the justification for approving the reduced setback is no longer relevant. Under The Noosa Plan, at a height of 11.5 metres above natural ground level, the proposal does not comply with Specific Outcome O5 of the Eastern Beaches Locality Code, under which a duplex is required to be setback 3.5 metres from side boundaries. The approved plans, at a 2.0 metre setback from the eastern boundary to the upper level terrace, and 2.5 metres to the building façade, would not be supported under the current planning scheme. The reduced setback would adversely impact on the amenity of the adjoining property in terms of privacy, given the potential for overlooking impacts of future developments. The terrace is of particular concern, as the viewlines towards the coast would result in residents looking towards the property at 7 Park Crescent. As such, the reduced setback is not supported. OPERATIONAL WORKS The design and conditions of the original Operational Works approval have not been amended since the approval was issued. Standards for operational works have changed significantly in the time since the approval was issued, therefore a number of the approved plans and conditions are now superseded by new requirements and standards. Council’s Coordinator Engineering has reviewed the approved plans and conditions and notes that a substantial number of plans and conditions are now no longer in accordance with current standards, and therefore would not be supported if the application was made today, specifically in relation to access, frontage works, stormwater and earthworks. Page 21 of 80
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.