Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

Information Response

of 10

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Item 17

Provide additional detail on how the access to the adjacent unit is not significantly
impacted by a heavy vehicle parked in the service bay.

Response: Please refer to the Swept Path Plan and Engineering RFI Response Letter prepared
by Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers. To allow for equitable access to the loading bay and to
reduce conflicts with other tenants during onsite servicing, 3 setdown areas for trucks have
been provided for ease of access to each tenancy. Each service area will only impact 2 tenancies
at a time and will be utilised by the adjacent unit. This arrangement ensures that only 1 tenancy
may be impacted at any time while the adjoining tenancy is being serviced. We need to stress
that only small and medium trucks will only ever service this site due to the small nature of the
tenancies.

Item 18

Provide amended plans of the heavy vehicle manoeuvring path that demonstrates
that the path is clear of landscaping areas and in those locations where it extends
under the roof line, provide sufficient detail to demonstrate that vertical height
clearances are available.

Response: Please refer to the Engineering RFI Response Letter and amended Engineering
Plans prepared by Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers. A HRV can manoeuvre on site without
impacting buildings or landscaped areas. Building roofs are at 6-7m which achieves sufficient
vertical clearance for a large truck.

Item 19

Indicate on the adjoining driveway on the engineering cross section plans and also
include on the plans any measures necessary to protect the structural integrity of
the driveway and the adjoining property.

Response: Please refer to the Engineering RFI Response Letter and amended Engineering
Plans prepared by Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers.

Item 20

Provide updated OPW drawings for the bioretention basin which address the
following issues:
    ● Provide survey for the existing drainage system that the bioretention device
       will connect into (i.e. existing pit IL and pipe diameter and outfall IL).
       Confirm that the basin subsoil drains will drain effectively.
    ● Show the proposed subsoil drain layout in plan view.
    ● Inconsistent level information is shown in the boxed text and on the sections
       for the bioretention on drawing R07 – resolve inconsistencies

Response: Please refer to the Engineering RFI Response Letter and amended Engineering
Plans prepared by Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers.


                                                                                               8
Log in to download the original file

Information Response.pdf · 5.0 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.