Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

Assessment letter · MCU14/0053.01

From the archive 00169634.zip, inside Change to DA - MCU14/0053.01. File date in the archive: 2018-03-05 09:53.

of 4

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                    Bennett and Franeis
                                                                                           fr
OUR REF: 032924001.doc


March 5,2018


Noosa Shire Council
Development Assessment
By email

Dear Sir/ Madam

     RE: 15 NOOSA DR¡VE / MCU 1410053 - MINOR CHANGE APPLICATION

We act on behalf of Cammeray lnvestments Pty Ltd in relation to the existing approval for
Retail Business Type2 premises at 15 Noosa Drive, Noosa Heads, as approved under
Decision Notice MCU114ÆO53 on 28th September 2015. We also note there is a Show
Cause Notice issued relating to unapproved building works.

To facilitate a change in the development proposed on the site, including the removal of
the above mentioned unapproved building works, in accordance with s81 of the Planning
Act 2016, we request a Change Application (Minor Change)to the existing approval.

Please find attached the following documentation associated with a Minor Change
Application to facilitate the provision of End of Trip facilities at 300 Queen Street,
Brisbane.

              ¡      Plans prepared by Soul Space Building Design;
              .      Change Application Forms, including owners consent.

Proposed Changes.

The proposed changes to the existing development, based on the attached Soul Space
plans comprise a change in the building design, namely by retaining the Noosa Drive and
southern walls as approved, reducing the overall east - west depth of the building and
building to the boundary along the northern boundary.

An awning has been added to the Noosa Drive frontage as well as over the windows, with
the site cover the same as the existing approved development.

Additionally, two car parking spaces have been added. Access to the car parking spaces
is from the existing road /pavement that services the developments behind (east) of the
subject lot, as well as providing car parking spaces to the south of the subject lot.

lnitial NSC Review

We have previously supplied copies of plans to Noosa Shire Council and note the initial
advice received confirming:




Bennett and Francis
Logan Flouse,25 Oonkin St, West End, Queensland, Australia
PO Box 3624, South Brisbane QLD 4t 01
Telephone 07 3239 5444 Facsimile 07 3239 5499 E-mail mailbox@bfsurveys,com,au       www.bfsurveys.com.au

ABN 49 446 453 59S
Full text of the other 3 pages

Page 2

    a    The proposed gross floor area is generally in accordance with the approved
         development
    a    There is no increase in use area and therefore no additional car parking
         generated.


Following amendment to the design to incorporate the advice regarding site cover and
subsequent review by Noosa Shire Council, further advice was received confirming the
proposed site cover is in accordance with the approved development.

We further note the advice the access and car parking is to be assessed as part of the
Minor Change Application.

Legislative Assessment

The Planning Act 2016 (s81) provides the opportunity for Change Applications to be made
to existing approvals. Change Applications are of two types, Minor Change to a
Development Approval and "Other" Change to a Development Approval.

Schedule 2 of the Planning Act 2016 outlines what is intended by a minor change

Minor change means a change that-

(b) for a development approval-

   (i)     would not result in a substantially different development;
   Following is an assessment against ltem 4 of Schedule l; Subsfantially Different
   Developmenf contained in the Development Assessment Rules, which provides a test
   for assessing whether a change results in a "substantially different development

    Substantially Different Development         Assessment of Proposal against
    Criteria                                    Substantially Different Development
                                                Griteria
    lnvolves a new use                          ïhere is no change to the existing
                                                aooroved use.
    Results in the application applying to a    There is no new parcel of land involved
    new parcel of land

    Dramatically changes the built form in      Whilst there are changes to the
    terms of scale, bulk or appearance          appearance of the built form, these are
                                                not considered dramatic.
    Changes the ability of the proposal to      There is no change to the ability of the
    operate as intended                         proposal to operate as intended.

    Removes a component that is integral to     Any component of the original
    the operation of the development            application that has been removed is not




                                                                                    www.bfsurveys.com.au

Page 3

                                                                                             B
                                                 integral to the operation of the
                                                 development.
     Significantly impacts on traffic flow and   There is no change to traffic flow or the
     the transport network, such as              transport network as a result of the
     increasing traffic to the site              changes.

     lntroduces new impacts or increase the      Whilst two car parking spaces have
     severity of known impacts                   been added to the proposal, the
                                                 provision of off street parking is
                                                 considered to be a benefit, rather than
                                                 an impact, by reducing the use of public
                                                 parkinq.
     Removes an incentive or offset              The proposed change is not considered
     component that would have balanced a        to remove an incentive or offset
     negative impact of the development          component.

     lmpacts on infrastructure provisions        The proposed change is not considered
                                                 to impact on infrastructure provisions.


(ii) if a development applicatíon for the development, including the change, were
made when the change application is made would not caus*

    (A) the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or

ïhe proposed change does not introduce any prohibited development.

    (B) referral to a referral agency, other than to the chief executive, íf there were no
       referral agencies for the development application; or

The proposed change does not trigger referral to any referral agencies

    (C) referral to extra referral agencies, other than to the chief executive; or

Not applicable, there were no referral agencies for the original development application
and the proposed change does not trigger referral to any referral agencies

   (D) a referral agency úo assess the application against, or have regard to,
       matters prescribed by regulation under section 55(2), other than matters the
       referral agency must have assessed the application against, or have had
       regard to, when the application was made; or

Not applicable, there were no referral agencies for the original development application
and the proposed change does not trigger referral to any referral agencies.




                                                                                   www.bfsurveys.com.au

Page 4

    (E) public notification if public notification was not required for the development
        application.

The existing application was lmpact Assessable, we note there were no submitters

ln summary, we believe that the proposed changes comply with the tests for a minor change
in accordance with schedule 2 of the Planning Act 2016.



Conclusion.

It is our contention the changes proposed by this application satisfy the tests for a minor
change as per the relevant legislation.

The proposed development, including the removal of the unapproved building works the
subject of the enforcement notice, will provide for a welcome and in context addition to the
surrounding area.


We look forward to a positive assessment of this application, should you have any
queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours faithfully,
    NETT & FRANCIS




Phil Pozzi.
p. pozzi @bfsu rueys. com. a u
Direct:07 3239 5407




                                                                                   www.bfsurveys.com.au

Used in these records

About this file

File size
227 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Assessment letter.pdf · 227 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.