Council archive · source document
Assessment letter · MCU14/0053.01
From the archive 00169634.zip, inside Change to DA - MCU14/0053.01. File date in the archive: 2018-03-05 09:53.
Bennett and Franeis
fr
OUR REF: 032924001.doc
March 5,2018
Noosa Shire Council
Development Assessment
By email
Dear Sir/ Madam
RE: 15 NOOSA DR¡VE / MCU 1410053 - MINOR CHANGE APPLICATION
We act on behalf of Cammeray lnvestments Pty Ltd in relation to the existing approval for
Retail Business Type2 premises at 15 Noosa Drive, Noosa Heads, as approved under
Decision Notice MCU114ÆO53 on 28th September 2015. We also note there is a Show
Cause Notice issued relating to unapproved building works.
To facilitate a change in the development proposed on the site, including the removal of
the above mentioned unapproved building works, in accordance with s81 of the Planning
Act 2016, we request a Change Application (Minor Change)to the existing approval.
Please find attached the following documentation associated with a Minor Change
Application to facilitate the provision of End of Trip facilities at 300 Queen Street,
Brisbane.
¡ Plans prepared by Soul Space Building Design;
. Change Application Forms, including owners consent.
Proposed Changes.
The proposed changes to the existing development, based on the attached Soul Space
plans comprise a change in the building design, namely by retaining the Noosa Drive and
southern walls as approved, reducing the overall east - west depth of the building and
building to the boundary along the northern boundary.
An awning has been added to the Noosa Drive frontage as well as over the windows, with
the site cover the same as the existing approved development.
Additionally, two car parking spaces have been added. Access to the car parking spaces
is from the existing road /pavement that services the developments behind (east) of the
subject lot, as well as providing car parking spaces to the south of the subject lot.
lnitial NSC Review
We have previously supplied copies of plans to Noosa Shire Council and note the initial
advice received confirming:
Bennett and Francis
Logan Flouse,25 Oonkin St, West End, Queensland, Australia
PO Box 3624, South Brisbane QLD 4t 01
Telephone 07 3239 5444 Facsimile 07 3239 5499 E-mail mailbox@bfsurveys,com,au www.bfsurveys.com.au
ABN 49 446 453 59S
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
a The proposed gross floor area is generally in accordance with the approved
development
a There is no increase in use area and therefore no additional car parking
generated.
Following amendment to the design to incorporate the advice regarding site cover and
subsequent review by Noosa Shire Council, further advice was received confirming the
proposed site cover is in accordance with the approved development.
We further note the advice the access and car parking is to be assessed as part of the
Minor Change Application.
Legislative Assessment
The Planning Act 2016 (s81) provides the opportunity for Change Applications to be made
to existing approvals. Change Applications are of two types, Minor Change to a
Development Approval and "Other" Change to a Development Approval.
Schedule 2 of the Planning Act 2016 outlines what is intended by a minor change
Minor change means a change that-
(b) for a development approval-
(i) would not result in a substantially different development;
Following is an assessment against ltem 4 of Schedule l; Subsfantially Different
Developmenf contained in the Development Assessment Rules, which provides a test
for assessing whether a change results in a "substantially different development
Substantially Different Development Assessment of Proposal against
Criteria Substantially Different Development
Griteria
lnvolves a new use ïhere is no change to the existing
aooroved use.
Results in the application applying to a There is no new parcel of land involved
new parcel of land
Dramatically changes the built form in Whilst there are changes to the
terms of scale, bulk or appearance appearance of the built form, these are
not considered dramatic.
Changes the ability of the proposal to There is no change to the ability of the
operate as intended proposal to operate as intended.
Removes a component that is integral to Any component of the original
the operation of the development application that has been removed is not
www.bfsurveys.com.au
Page 3
B
integral to the operation of the
development.
Significantly impacts on traffic flow and There is no change to traffic flow or the
the transport network, such as transport network as a result of the
increasing traffic to the site changes.
lntroduces new impacts or increase the Whilst two car parking spaces have
severity of known impacts been added to the proposal, the
provision of off street parking is
considered to be a benefit, rather than
an impact, by reducing the use of public
parkinq.
Removes an incentive or offset The proposed change is not considered
component that would have balanced a to remove an incentive or offset
negative impact of the development component.
lmpacts on infrastructure provisions The proposed change is not considered
to impact on infrastructure provisions.
(ii) if a development applicatíon for the development, including the change, were
made when the change application is made would not caus*
(A) the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or
ïhe proposed change does not introduce any prohibited development.
(B) referral to a referral agency, other than to the chief executive, íf there were no
referral agencies for the development application; or
The proposed change does not trigger referral to any referral agencies
(C) referral to extra referral agencies, other than to the chief executive; or
Not applicable, there were no referral agencies for the original development application
and the proposed change does not trigger referral to any referral agencies
(D) a referral agency úo assess the application against, or have regard to,
matters prescribed by regulation under section 55(2), other than matters the
referral agency must have assessed the application against, or have had
regard to, when the application was made; or
Not applicable, there were no referral agencies for the original development application
and the proposed change does not trigger referral to any referral agencies.
www.bfsurveys.com.au
Page 4
(E) public notification if public notification was not required for the development
application.
The existing application was lmpact Assessable, we note there were no submitters
ln summary, we believe that the proposed changes comply with the tests for a minor change
in accordance with schedule 2 of the Planning Act 2016.
Conclusion.
It is our contention the changes proposed by this application satisfy the tests for a minor
change as per the relevant legislation.
The proposed development, including the removal of the unapproved building works the
subject of the enforcement notice, will provide for a welcome and in context addition to the
surrounding area.
We look forward to a positive assessment of this application, should you have any
queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours faithfully,
NETT & FRANCIS
Phil Pozzi.
p. pozzi @bfsu rueys. com. a u
Direct:07 3239 5407
www.bfsurveys.com.au
Used in these records
Assessment letter.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 227 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.