Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

Assessment letter · MCU14/0053.01

From the archive 00169634.zip, inside Change to DA - MCU14/0053.01. File date in the archive: 2018-03-05 09:53.

of 4

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                                             B
                                                 integral to the operation of the
                                                 development.
     Significantly impacts on traffic flow and   There is no change to traffic flow or the
     the transport network, such as              transport network as a result of the
     increasing traffic to the site              changes.

     lntroduces new impacts or increase the      Whilst two car parking spaces have
     severity of known impacts                   been added to the proposal, the
                                                 provision of off street parking is
                                                 considered to be a benefit, rather than
                                                 an impact, by reducing the use of public
                                                 parkinq.
     Removes an incentive or offset              The proposed change is not considered
     component that would have balanced a        to remove an incentive or offset
     negative impact of the development          component.

     lmpacts on infrastructure provisions        The proposed change is not considered
                                                 to impact on infrastructure provisions.


(ii) if a development applicatíon for the development, including the change, were
made when the change application is made would not caus*

    (A) the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or

ïhe proposed change does not introduce any prohibited development.

    (B) referral to a referral agency, other than to the chief executive, íf there were no
       referral agencies for the development application; or

The proposed change does not trigger referral to any referral agencies

    (C) referral to extra referral agencies, other than to the chief executive; or

Not applicable, there were no referral agencies for the original development application
and the proposed change does not trigger referral to any referral agencies

   (D) a referral agency úo assess the application against, or have regard to,
       matters prescribed by regulation under section 55(2), other than matters the
       referral agency must have assessed the application against, or have had
       regard to, when the application was made; or

Not applicable, there were no referral agencies for the original development application
and the proposed change does not trigger referral to any referral agencies.




                                                                                   www.bfsurveys.com.au

Used in these records

About this file

File size
227 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Assessment letter.pdf · 227 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.